Search

Abstract Selpercatinib is the first targeted therapy for rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion‐positive unresectable non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The main adverse effects of selpercatinib include hypertension, liver dysfunction, diarrhea, and QT prolongation on electrocardiograms. However, instances of drug‐induced interstitial lung disease (DI‐ILD) are infrequently reported. We describe the first case of a patient with RET fusion‐positive NSCLC treated with selpercatinib who developed DI‐ILD, confirmed pathologically. The patient, a 72‐year‐old woman, initiated selpercatinib treatment following the postoperative recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma. After 15 months of treatment, computed tomography scans revealed multiple infiltrates and ground‐glass opacities in both lungs. A thoracoscopic lung biopsy identified organizing pneumonia, attributed to DI‐ILD caused by selpercatinib. Although she was asymptomatic, the patient's selpercatinib treatment was discontinued, leading to a gradual improvement in the lung infiltrates. Despite the lack of detailed reports, DI‐ILD with selpercatinib represents a potentially serious adverse event and should be approached with caution.

Abstract Background Companion diagnostic tests play a crucial role in guiding treatment decisions for patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The Oncomine Dx Target Test (ODxTT) Multi‐CDx System has emerged as a prominent companion diagnostic method. However, its efficacy in detecting driver gene mutations, particularly rare mutations, warrants investigation. Aims This study aimed to assess the performance of the ODxTT in detecting driver gene mutations in NSCLC patients. Specifically, we aimed to evaluate its sensitivity in detecting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, a key determinant of treatment selection in NSCLC. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of NSCLC patients who underwent testing with the ODxTT at Keio University Hospital between May 2020 and March 2022. Patient samples were subjected to both DNA and RNA tests. Driver gene mutation status was assessed, and instances of missed mutations were meticulously examined. Results Of the 90 patients, five had nucleic acid quality problems, while 85 underwent both DNA and RNA tests. Driver gene mutations were detected in 56/90 (62.2%) patients. Of the 34 patient specimens, driver mutations were not detected using the ODxTT; however, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations were detected using polymerase chain reaction‐based testing in two patients, and a KRAS mutation was detected by careful examination of the sequence data obtained using the ODxTT in one patient. For the above three cases, carefully examining the gene sequence information obtained using the ODxTT could identify driver mutations that were not mentioned in the returned test results. Additionally, we confirmed comparable instances of overlook results for EGFR mutations in the dataset from South Korea, implying that this type of oversight could occur in other countries using the ODxTT. EGFR mutation was missed in ODxTT in Japan (6.3%, 2/32), South Korea (2.0%, 1/49), and overall (3.7%, 3/81). Conclusion Even if sufficient tumor samples are obtained, rare EGFR mutations (which are excluded from the ODxTT's genetic mutation list) might not be detected using the current ODxTT system due to the program used for sequence analysis. However, such rare EGFR mutations can still be accurately detected on ODxTT's sequence data using next‐generation sequencing.

Patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exhibit resistance to EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) within 9–14 months of therapy. Recently, EGFR‐mutated NSCLC has demonstrated the potential for heterogeneity; therefore, the manner of clonal heterogeneity may impact the duration of progression‐free and overall survival and other parameters affecting EGFR‐TKI treatment efficacy. However no predictive biomarker of these favorable treatment efficacies has been identified to date. The exosome‐focused translational research for afatinib (EXTRA) study aims to identify a novel predictive biomarker and a resistance marker for afatinib by analyzing data from association studies of the clinical efficacy of afatinib and four “OMICs” (genomics, proteomics, epigenomics, and metabolomics) using peripheral blood from patients treated with afatinib. This study aims to: (i) conduct comprehensive multi‐OMIC analyses in a prospective clinical trial, and (ii) focus on both sera/plasma and exosome as a source for OMIC analyses to identify a novel predictor of the efficacy of a specific drug. To eliminate the carryover bias of prior treatment, systemic treatment‐naïve patients were enrolled. The candidates to be screened for biomarkers comprise a discovery cohort of 60 patients and an independent validation cohort of 40 patients. The EXTRA study is the first trial to screen novel biomarkers of longer treatment efficacy of EGFR‐TKIs using four‐OMICs analyses, focusing on both “naked or free” molecules and “capsulated” exosomal components in serially collected peripheral blood.

Background. Recent clinical trials proven the clinically significant efficacy and tolerability of nivolumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Case Presentation. Here, we describe the case of a patient who experienced possible “disease flare” immediately after initiation of nivolumab treatment. A 54-year-old man was diagnosed with Stage IIB (T2N1M0) lung adenocarcinoma. After 7 years from recurrence, 10th line chemotherapy, nivolumab, was initiated. Six weeks later, after 3 cycles of nivolumab treatment, rapid lung cancer progression was observed with an increase in the size of the primary lesion, multiple novel nodules on both lungs, and multiple novel brain metastases. Conclusion. We believe that physicians should be made aware that, in a subset of NSCLC patients, disease flare might occur on nivolumab treatment.