Search

Background: Post-prandial lipid abnormalities might contribute to the excess of cardiovascular risk typical of type 2 diabetic patients. The study evaluated the effects of atorvastatin (20 mg d(-1)) vs. fenofibrate (200 mg d(-1)) on post-prandial lipids in type 2 diabetic patients with mixed hyperlipidaemia., Materials and Method: Eight type 2 diabetic patients, male/female (M/F) 6/2, age 58 +/- 5 years, body mass index (BMI) 28 +/- 3 kg m(-2) with cholesterol of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) between 100-160 mg dL(-1) and triglycerides between 150-400 mg dL(-1), participated in a randomized, cross-over study (3 months on atorvastatin and 3 months on fenofibrate). At baseline and at the end of the two treatments, the patients were given a standard fat meal; blood samples were taken before the meal and every 2 h after for the assay of cholesterol, triglycerides, apoB-48 and apoB-100 (determined by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) in plasma lipoproteins and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) subfractions (large and small VLDL), separated by density gradient ultracentrifugation., Results: Data on fasting lipids confirmed that atorvastatin was more effective on the reduction of LDL-cholesterol, whereas fenofibrate was a better triglyceride-lowering agent. Concerning the post-prandial phase, the incremental areas under the curve (IAUC) for chylomicrons and large VLDL were reduced after both treatments, reaching statistical significance for cholesterol, triglyceride and apoB-100 content of chylomicrons only after fenofibrate administration [IAUC, (5.2 +/- 4.6 vs. 10.7 +/- 9.3) mg dL(-1) h(-1), P = 0.03; (131.3 +/- 95.1 vs. 259.1 +/- 201.5) mg dL(-1) h(-1), P = 0.02; (0.46 +/- 1 vs. 3 +/- 3.7) mg dL(-1) h(-1), P = 0.025, all respectively]., Conclusions: During the post-prandial state fenofibrate appeared to be more effective than atorvastatin in reducing the chylomicron response.