Search

Background Current literature has demonstrated the utility of the MRSA nasal screen as a de-escalation tool to decrease unnecessary anti-MRSA antibiotic therapy. However, data on the applicability of this test in patients with hematologic malignancy is lacking. Methods This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with or without history of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), with pneumonia and MRSA nasal screening with respiratory cultures obtained. The primary outcome was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of the MRSA nasal screen for MRSA pneumonia. Secondary outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) of the MRSA nasal screen and prevalence of MRSA pneumonia. Results Of 98 patients with AML and pneumonia, the prevalence of MRSA pneumonia was 4.1% with confirmed positive MRSA respiratory cultures observed in 4 patient cases. In patients with confirmed MRSA pneumonia, 3 had positive MRSA nasal screens while 1 had a false negative result, possibly due to a long lag time (21 days) between MRSA nasal screen and pneumonia diagnosis. Overall, the MRSA nasal screen demonstrated 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity, with a PPV of 100% and a NPV of 98.9%. Conclusions Given the low prevalence, empiric use of anti-MRSA therapy in those AML and HCT patients with pneumonia may not be warranted in clinically stable patients. For patients in whom empiric anti-MRSA antibiotics are initiated, nasal screening for MRSA may be utilized to de-escalate anti-MRSA antibiotics in patients with AML with or without HCT.

Cobicistat is a pharmacokinetic booster in several fixed-dose combination products for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. As a potent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A enzymes, significant drug-drug interactions are expected between cobicistat and medications that are metabolized primarily through the CYP3A pathway, including calcineurin inhibitors (e.g., tacrolimus and cyclosporine). We describe a case of tacrolimus toxicity due to supratherapeutic tacrolimus concentrations when Stribild (elvitegravir, cobicistat, emtricitabine, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) was initiated for newly diagnosed HIV infection in a 50-year-old renal transplant recipient who was previously receiving a stable tacrolimus regimen. Drug-drug interaction via CYP3A inhibition was acknowledged, and weekly labs were ordered to allow for close monitoring of renal function and tacrolimus serum concentrations as recommended by Stribild prescribing information. The patient reported headache, insomnia, stomachache, and decreased urine output within 1 week of starting Stribild and was found to have acute kidney injury (serum creatinine [Scr ]concentration increasing from 1.5-2.3 mg/dl) and a serum tacrolimus concentration of 111.2 ng/ml at 1 week follow-up (goal trough level 4-6 ng/ml). Both tacrolimus and Stribild were withheld. In 15 days, the patient's tacrolimus serum concentration returned to goal. In the interim, he required twice/week clinic visits for laboratory assessments and an emergency department visit for management of hyperkalemia (potassium 6.5 mEq/L). Triumeq (abacavir, dolutegravir, and lamivudine) was started about 4 weeks later after Scr returned to baseline, and his tacrolimus serum trough concentrations subsequently remained stable. To our knowledge, this is the first case report describing the extent, significance, and onset of cobicistat and tacrolimus drug-drug interaction in clinical practice. As more fixed-dose combination products including cobicistat as a pharmacokinetic booster come to market, clinicians should be reminded of its multitude of clinically significant drug-drug interactions.

Background The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend collecting blood cultures for the first 3 days of febrile neutropenia (FN) in the clinically stable oncology patient with persistent fevers. Nonetheless, many physicians send daily blood cultures beyond 3 days, and the impact of that practice is uncertain. Procedure We reviewed pediatric FN episodes from July 2009 to May 2014 at University of Chicago Comer Children's Hospital. For each positive culture, we determined if it was a pathogen or a contaminant. We reviewed episode and patient demographics to identify risk factors for subsequent positive blood cultures in the setting of an initially negative culture. Results We identified 381 episodes of FN in 162 patients. Of those, 87 had a positive blood culture on day 1 (21.0% incidence of bacteremia). Of 294 episodes with a negative blood culture on day 1, six (2.04%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–3.67) had a positive culture after day 3. Of those, three were pathogens (1.02%, 95%CI –0.14 to 2.18), and only one was found in a hemodynamically stable patient (0.34%, 95%CI –0.33 to 1.01) with new mucositis. In the other two patients, Escherichia coli was isolated from blood cultures after day 10 in the setting of significant hemodynamic changes. Risk factor analysis performed in stable patients yielded nonsignificant results. Conclusions Of 294 FN episodes with an initial negative blood culture, only one episode of bacteremia occurred without hemodynamic changes past day 3, supporting the IDSA guidelines to discontinue blood cultures in stable FN patients after day 3.

Coxiella burnetii, the causative agent of Q fever, is a zoonosis that causes both acute and chronic disease in humans. Few cases have been reported in solid organ transplant recipients, and this case highlights the need to include Q fever in the differential diagnosis for fever of unknown origin in solid organ transplant hosts.