1. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Reduces Movement‐Evoked Pain and Fatigue: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
- Author
-
Barbara A. Rakel, Ericka N. Merriwether, Katharine M. Geasland, M. Bridget Zimmerman, Meenakshi Golchha, Leslie J. Crofford, Kathleen A. Sluka, Jon M. Williams, Jennie Embree, Ruth L. Chimenti, Dana L. Dailey, and Carol G.T. Vance
- Subjects
Adult ,Fibromyalgia ,Randomization ,Movement ,Immunology ,Pain ,Placebo ,Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Lumbar ,Double-Blind Method ,Rheumatology ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Humans ,Pain Management ,Immunology and Allergy ,Medicine ,Adverse effect ,Fatigue ,030203 arthritis & rheumatology ,business.industry ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Confidence interval ,Anesthesia ,Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation ,Female ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
OBJECTIVE Fibromyalgia (FM) is characterized by pain and fatigue, particularly during physical activity. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) activates endogenous pain inhibitory mechanisms. This study was undertaken to investigate if using TENS during activity would improve movement-evoked pain and other patient-reported outcomes in women with FM. METHODS Participants were randomly assigned to receive active TENS (n = 103), placebo TENS (n = 99), or no TENS (n = 99) and instructed to use it at home during activity 2 hours each day for 4 weeks. TENS was applied to the lumbar and cervicothoracic regions using a modulated frequency (2-125 Hz) at the highest tolerable intensity. Participants rated movement-evoked pain (primary outcome measure) and fatigue on an 11-point scale before and during application of TENS. The primary outcome measure and secondary patient-reported outcomes were assessed at baseline (time of randomization) and at 4 weeks. RESULTS After 4 weeks, a greater reduction in movement-evoked pain was reported in the active TENS group versus the placebo TENS group (group mean difference -1.0 [95% confidence interval -1.8, -0.2]; P = 0.008) and versus the no TENS group (group mean difference -1.8 [95% confidence interval -2.6, -1.0]; P < 0.0001). A reduction in movement-evoked fatigue was also reported in the active TENS group versus the placebo TENS group (group mean difference -1.4 [95% confidence interval -2.4, -0.4]; P = 0.001) and versus the no TENS group (group mean difference -1.9 [95% confidence interval -2.9, -0.9]; P =
- Published
- 2020