Search

Background Prospective studies are needed to understand the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic pancreatectomy. The aim of the present study was to describe laparoscopic pancreatectomy currently undertaken in Japan, using a prospective registration system. Methods Patient characteristics and planned operations were registered preoperatively, and then the performed operation and outcomes were reported using an online system. Collected data were also compared between institutions based on their level of experience. This study was registered with UMIN000022836. Results Available data were obtained from 1,429 patients at 100 Japanese institutions, including 1,197 laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies (LDPs) and 232 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomies (LPDs). The rates of completion for planned operations were 92% for LDP and 91% for LPD. Postoperative complication rates after LDP and LPD were 17% and 30%, and 90-day mortality rates were 0.3% and 0.4%, respectively. Shorter operation time, less blood loss, and lower incidence of pancreatic fistula were observed in institutions experienced in LDP. A higher rate of pure laparoscopic procedure and shorter operation time were noted in institutions experienced with LPD. Conclusion LDPs and LPDs are performed safely in Japan, especially in experienced institutions. Our data could support the next challenges in the field of laparoscopic pancreatectomy.

Background and Objectives Pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) has been associated with a high incidence of delayed gastric emptying (DGE). There are few studies comparing DGE associated with PPPD and subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (SSPPD). Moreover, differences between the procedures with respect to long-term results have not been reported. A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare perioperative complications and long-term nutritional status with PPPD and SSPPD. Methods One hundred patients with periampullary lesions were randomized to receive either PPPD (n = 50) or SSPPD (n = 50). All patients were followed up for 3 years after surgery or to the time of recurrence to evaluate nutritional status for the study. The effects of the procedure, age, and malignancy on changes in nutritional indicators were estimated with linear mixed models. This study was registered at UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN 000012337). Results The incidence of DGE assessed by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery was 20% with PPPD and 12% with SSPPD (P = 0.414). There were no significant differences between the two procedures on postoperative serum albumin levels, serum total cholesterol levels, and body mass index during the 3-year follow-up period. Conclusions SSPPD is equally effective in DGE occurrence rate and long-term nutritional status comparing to PPPD. J. Surg. Oncol 2014; 109:690–696. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.