Search

Membrane proteins constitute about one third of proteins encoded by all genomes, but only a small percentage have their structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank. One bottleneck in the pipeline from expression to structure determination is the identification of detergents that maintain the protein in a soluble, stable, and active state. Here, we describe a small-scale automated procedure to easily and rapidly screen detergents for the solubilization and purification of membrane proteins, to perform detergent exchange, or to identify conditions preserving protein interactions in complexes. Hundreds of conditions can be tested in a few hours to select detergents that keep proteins folded and nonaggregated, from single membrane preparations of cells overexpressing the protein(s) of interest. Thirty-one prokaryotic, eukaryotic, and viral membrane proteins were analyzed by our small-scale procedure to identify the best-associated detergents. Examples of results obtained with a bitopic and multitopic membrane proteins and membrane protein complexes are presented in more detail. DDM, DM, DMNG, TritonX-100, LAPAO, and Fos-12 appeared effective for successful membrane solubilization and protein purification of most selected targets. Eukaryotic proteins are in general more difficult to extract and purify from Escherichia coli membranes than prokaryotic proteins. The protocol has been developed for His-tagged proteins, but can readily be adapted to other affinity tags by adjusting the chromatography resin and the buffer composition.

DivIB, DivIC and FtsL are bacterial proteins essential for cell division, which show interdependencies for their stabilities and localization. We have reconstituted in vitro a trimeric complex consisting of the recombinant extracellular domains of the three proteins from Streptococcus pneumoniae. The extracellular domain of DivIB was found to associate with a heterodimer of those of DivIC and FtsL. The heterodimerization of DivIC and FtsL was artificially constrained by fusion with interacting coiled-coils. Immunofluorescence experiments showed that DivIC is always localized at mid-cell, in contrast to DivIB and FtsL, which are co-localized with DivIC only during septation. Taken together, our data suggest that assembly of the trimeric complex DivIB/DivIC/FtsL is regulated during the cell cycle through controlled formation of the DivIC/FtsL heterodimer.

Summary Bacterial division requires the co-ordination of membrane invagination, driven by the constriction of the FtsZ-ring, and concomitant cell wall synthesis, performed by the high-molecular-weight penicillin-binding proteins (HMW PBPs). Using immunofluorescence techniques, we show in Streptococcus pneumoniae that this co-ordination requires PBP3, a d,d-carboxypeptidase that degrades the substrate of the HMW PBPs. In a mutant deprived of PBP3, the apparent rings of HMW PBPs and that of FtsZ are no longer co-localized. In wild-type cells, PBP3 is absent at the future division site and present over the rest of the cell surface, implying that the localization of the HMW PBPs at mid-cell depends on the availability of their substrate. FtsW, a putative translocase of the substrate of the PBPs, forms an apparent ring that is co-localized with the septal HMW PBPs throughout the cell cycle of wild-type cells. In particular, the constriction of the FtsW-ring occurs after that of the FtsZ-ring, with the same delay as the constriction of the septal PBP-rings. However, in the absence of PBP3, FtsW remains co-localized with FtsZ in contrast to the HMW PBPs. Our work reveals an unexpected complexity in the relationships between the division proteins. The consequences of the absence of PBP3 indicate that the peptidoglycan composition is central to the co-ordination of the division process.

sigma(S) (RpoS), the master regulator of the general stress response in Escherichia coli, is a model system for regulated proteolysis in bacteria. sigma(S) turnover requires ClpXP and the response regulator RssB, whose phosphorylated form exhibits high affinity for sigma(S). Here, we demonstrate that recognition by the RssB/ClpXP system involves two distinct regions in sigma(S). Region 2.5 of sigma(S) (a long alpha-helix) is sufficient for binding of phosphorylated RssB. However, this interaction alone is not sufficient to trigger proteolysis. A second region located in the N-terminal part of sigma(S), which is exposed only upon RssB-sigma(S) interaction, serves as a binding site for the ClpX chaperone. Binding of the ClpX hexameric ring to sigma(S)-derived reporter proteins carrying the ClpX-binding site (but not the RssB-binding site) is also not sufficient to commit the protein to degradation. Our data indicate that RssB plays a second role in the initiation of sigma(S) proteolysis that goes beyond targeting of sigma(S) to ClpX, and suggest a model for the sequence of events in the initiation of sigma(S) proteolysis.