Search

[Paleogeographic reconstruction of the Levant area in the Early Miocene (15–20 Ma) highlighting the main sediment routing systems into the deep Levant Basin and their detrital zircon and rutile U‐Pb age spectra and a non metric multi‐dimensional scaling map (MDS) of detrital zircon U‐Pb ages of studied Israeli Miocene samples and Miocene Nile Delta samples. ASG, Azrqa Sirhan Graben; DST, Dead Sea Transform. , Abstract Isolated, Miocene continental basins scattered over Israel and Jordan represent the remnants of a continental‐wide fluvial system, which originated in Arabia and transported siliciclastic sediments westward to the deep Levant Basin. These basins define two geographically separated sedimentary provinces. The detrital zircon age spectra in both provinces are dominated by Neoproterozoic U‐Pb ages (550–1,000 Ma), resembling those of Paleozoic‐Mesozoic sandstones exposed along the uplifted Red Sea Rift flank. However, while the southern province exhibits two prominent peaks at ~600 and ~1,000 Ma, similar to those seen in Cambrian‐Ordovician sandstones in southern Israel and Jordan, the northern province shows an additional significant age peak at ~800 Ma and its overall spectrum resembles that of Devonian sandstones in northern Saudi Arabia. These variations distinguish the two Miocene clastic outliers as pertaining to two separate, NW‐directed transport systems delivering siliciclastic sediments from Arabia towards the deep Levant Basin. The detrital zircon U‐Pb‐Hf signal of the Israeli Miocene clastic units differs from that of the River Nile, particularly in the lack of Cenozoic‐Mesozoic‐aged zircons in the former. This allows us to distinguish the properties of the fluvial system that existed in Arabia, on the eastern side of the Red Sea, from that of the River Nile that drained its western flanks. While it is commonly accepted that the (proto‐)Nile River played a key role in the Levant Basin fill, the eastern fluvial system that prevailed on the Arabian side may have been also important.]