Search

In order to ensure eligibility for living kidney donation, donor candidates undergo a thorough medical evaluation. This process might reveal hitherto undetected medical conditions, leading to refusal of the kidney donor candidate. Detection of such conditions may, however, also have a lifesaving effect. We report on 13 years of data from our living donor transplantation program on kidney donor candidates who were diagnosed with major medical conditions during evaluation.We performed a retrospective analysis of living kidney donor candidates who attended our transplant center between January, 2007 and December, 2019. The main focus was on newly diagnosed medical conditions that required immediate medical attention and their prognostic significance.Of the 436 donor candidates who were evaluated for living kidney donation at our transplant center, 192 (44%) were accepted, while 244 (56%) were excluded from donation. Interestingly, 81 (33.1%) of the ineligible donor candidates were newly diagnosed as having a medical condition that required immediate attention. While 45 (18.5%) candidates were newly diagnosed with diabetes or prediabetes, 12 (4.9%) candidates had hitherto undetected malignancies, 10 candidates (4.1%) cardiac disease, five (2.0%) hypertension with end-organ damage, and four (1.6%) suffered from kidney disease. The remaining four candidates (1.6%) were diagnosed with gastrointestinal diseases, and one candidate (.4%) had an endocrine disorder.A comprehensive evaluation process for living kidney donation facilitates the identification of life-changing diagnoses in a significant proportion of candidates and secures immediate medical attention.

Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a relevant complication following liver transplantation with profound impact on morbidity and mortality. To date, little is known about the evolution and dynamics of glucose metabolism and the impact of prediabetes in long-term follow-up. To address this issue, all consecutive adult liver transplant recipients (n = 429) from a European university hospital transplant center between 2007 and 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. In patients without pre-existing diabetes (n = 327), we conducted a longitudinal characterization of glucose metabolism. Median follow-up was 37 [9-64, IQR] months. Median prevalence of prediabetes was 39 [37-39]% and of PTDM 21 [17-22]%. Throughout follow-up, intra-individual glucose regulation of patients was highly variable, continuously fluctuating between different states of glucose metabolism (normal glucose tolerance, prediabetes, PTDM). Whereas overall survival and long-term kidney function of patients with PTDM were significantly lower than that of patients with normal glucose metabolism, prediabetes was not associated with adverse outcome. This study provides new insight into the dynamics and impact of glucose metabolism after liver transplantation. Unlike PTDM, prediabetes is not associated with adverse outcome, providing a window of opportunity for targeted intervention. The results underline the need for constant screening and intervention in posttransplant care of liver allograft recipients.

Background: Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) remains a relevant complication following kidney transplantation with allograft loss rates of up to 50%. Reduction in overall immunosuppression is a cornerstone of therapy, whereas no specific antiviral regimen has shown conclusive benefit to date. The present case series demonstrates the efficacy of a dual therapeutic approach with low-dose cidofovir and conversion to mTOR-based immunosuppression in PVAN. Methods: Patients with biopsy-proven PVAN having received low-dose cidofovir (0.25mg/kg) according to the Tübingen Cidofovir Protocol and been converted to mTOR-based immunosuppression were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Twenty-three patients with a median follow-up of 2.24 [IQR 1.55-5.01] years were included in the analysis. Median time to PVAN diagnosis was 268 [IQR 153-869] days after transplantation. Polyomavirus clearance from plasma was achieved in 78% of patients after a median of 118 [IQR 76-293] days. Of the 23 patients, nine patients (39%) lost their allograft function during follow-up, but only three of these (13%) due to PVAN. Fourteen patients (61%) stabilized or improved allograft function. The cidofovir protocol allowed for specific antiviral therapy without adverse nephrotoxicity, even in patients with low allograft function. Conclusions: Low-dose cidofovir and conversion to mTOR-based immunosuppression allow for effective virus clearance and preservation of allograft function in a high proportion of patients with PVAN and progressive allograft dysfunction and may prolong allograft survival in these patients.

The German Sirolimus Study Group has established a database among 10 transplant centers throughout Germany to study the outcomes in 726 renal transplant patients being converted to a sirolimus-containing therapy between 2000 and 2008 with a total of more than 1500 recorded patient years on therapy. In this study, we present a detailed description of the cohort, of characteristic changes over the observation period, proteinuria and graft survival, and new-onset proteinuria after conversion. Over the study period, age, graft function at the time of conversion, and the proportion of patients switched to sirolimus because of malignancy increased, whereas the proportion of patients with significant proteinuria at conversion decreased. Already modest proteinuria (151-268 mg/L) at conversion and new-onset proteinuria (>500 mg/L) after conversion were associated with inferior graft survival. Even mild proteinuria (>71 mg/L) at conversion was associated with new-onset proteinuria (>500 mg/L) post-conversion. Serum creatinine and urinary protein excretion at conversion together with age at transplantation had a significant impact on patient and graft survival. This large data set confirms and extends previous observations that proteinuria is an important indicator for graft outcome after conversion to sirolimus. We conclude that patients without any proteinuria have the greatest benefit from conversion to sirolimus.