Search

Abstract Aims Transcatheter aortic valvular replacement (TAVR) is increasingly being performed for elderly patients with aortic stenosis (AS), and current guidelines acknowledge the importance of shared decision‐making in their management. This study aimed to evaluate elderly symptomatic severe AS patients' perspectives on their treatment goals and identify factors that influence their treatment choice. Methods and Results We performed a pre‐procedural cross‐sectional survey using a questionnaire at a single university hospital. The questionnaire included three primary domains: (i) symptom burden, (ii) goals and important factors related to treatment, and (iii) preferred place of residence after treatment. We investigated 98 symptomatic severe AS patients who underwent TAVR (median age 86 years, 26% men). None of the patients died during hospitalization, and most of them (94%) were discharged home. Prior to TAVR, the three most common symptom burdens were poor mobility (52%), shortness of breath (52%), and weakness (44%). The reported preferred treatment goals were symptom burden reduction (78%), independence maintenance (68%), ability to perform a specific activity/hobby (62%), and improvement in prognosis (58%). In total, 54% of the patients rated ‘in alignment with my values’ as the factor that affected their decision to undergo TAVR. Nearly all patients (95%) stated that they preferred to live at home after TAVR. Conclusions Among elderly AS patients with varying symptoms who underwent TAVR, symptom burden reduction was the most cited patient‐reported goal. Nearly all the patients preferred to live at home after the procedure. Encouraging patients to define their specific goals may improve the quality of shared decision‐making in such settings.

Background Subclinical leaflet thrombosis, characterized by hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) on multidetector computed tomography, is common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Because little is known about the long‐term natural history of subclinical HALT, we aimed to investigate this in patients who underwent TAVR without using additional anticoagulation. Methods and Results We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent TAVR with the Edwards SAPIEN‐XT at our institute between October 2013 and December 2015. Patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of HALT within 1 year after TAVR (HALT and No‐HALT groups). The primary outcome, defined as the composite of all‐cause mortality, heart failure readmission, and ischemic stroke, was compared. Valve performance was assessed over time by transthoracic echocardiography. Among 124 patients (men: 29.1%; median age, 85 years), 27 (21.8%) showed HALT on multidetector computed tomography within 1 year after TAVR. No patient required additional anticoagulation for treating HALT because of the absence of valve‐related symptomatic deterioration. During the median follow‐up period of 4.7 years (interquartile range, 4.0–5.6), the rate of primary outcome and valve performance was not statistically different between the 2 groups (37.0% versus 38.1%; log‐rank test P=0.92; mean pressure gradient, 9 mm Hg [8–14 mm Hg] versus 10 mm Hg [7–15 mm Hg]; P=0.51, respectively). Conclusions Approximately 20% of patients after TAVR had HALT within 1 year; however, that did not change the risk of subsequent adverse cardiovascular events or the valve performance with statistical significance for up to 5 years despite no additional anticoagulation therapy.

Background In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), those with small left ventricle (LV) may have an increased risk of poor outcomes, because small LV is associated with low‐flow (LF), left ventricular hypertrophy. However, the impact of small LV on patients undergoing TAVR remains unknown. Methods and Results We examined 2584 patients who underwent TAVR between October 2013 and May 2017 using data from the Japanese multicenter registry. On the basis of the American Society of Echocardiography guidelines, small LV was defined as left ventricular end‐diastolic dimension