Search

Abstract Aims Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is characterized by left ventricular (LV) dysfunction developing towards the end of pregnancy or in the first months postpartum. Although about 60% of women with PPCM (the majority of which are prescribed evidence based heart failure [HF] medications) show LV recovery within 6 to 12 months, others remain with persistently impaired LV function. Poor adherence to medical therapy represents a major cause of avoidable hospitalizations, disability, and death in other cardiovascular conditions. In this study, we aimed to determine drug adherence to HF therapy among women with PPCM and to identify possible associations between drug adherence and LV recovery, functional status and psychological well‐being. Methods and results In this single‐centre, prospective, observational study, we included 36 consecutive women with PPCM. Adherence to HF treatment was assessed by (i) verifying the collection of pharmacy refills and (ii) using liquid chromatography high‐resolution mass spectrometry (LC‐HRMS). Participants were thereby classified as ‘adherent’ (i.e. all prescribed HF drugs were detectable by LC‐HRMS), ‘partially adherent’ (i.e. at least one prescribed drug detectable) or ‘non‐adherent’ (i.e. none of the prescribed drugs detectable). Health state index scores were assessed by EQ‐5D‐5L and HADS‐A/D (for anxiety/depression). Patients' median age was 32.4 years (IQR 27.6–36.1). At the adherence visit (which occurred at a median of 16 months [IQR 5–45] after PPCM diagnosis), prescription included beta‐blockers (77.8%), angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers (75%), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (47.2%) and loop diuretics (95.2%). Less than two thirds of patients (63.9%) collected all their pharmacy refills in the 6 months prior to adherence visit. According to LC‐HRMS, 23.5% participants were classified as adherent, 53.0% as partially adherent, and 23.5% as non‐adherent. Adherence was associated with significantly lower LVEDD at follow‐up (47 mm [IQR 46–52), vs. 56 mm [IQR 49–64] with partial adherence, and 62 mm [IQR 55–64] with non‐adherence, P = 0.022), and higher LVEF at follow‐up (60% [IQR 41–65]), vs. partially adherence (46% [IQR 34–50]) and non‐adherence (41.0% [IQR 29–47], P = 014). Adherent patients had a lower overall EQ‐ 5D score (5.5 [IQR 5–7.5], vs. 6 [IQR 5–7] in partially adherent, and 10 [IQR 8–15] in non‐adherent patients, P = 0.032) suggestive of a better self‐rated health status. Conclusions Adherence to HF therapy was associated with favourable LV reverse remodelling in PPCM and better self‐rated health status. Our study highlights the importance of drug adherence for functional recovery. Drug adherence should be an important component of patient communication and specific interventions in PPCM.

Abstract Aims This study aims to compare the clinical course of peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) cohorts from Germany (G‐PPCM) and South Africa (SA‐PPCM) with fibrosis‐related markers to get insights into novel pathomechanisms of PPCM. Methods and results G‐PPCM (n = 79) and SA‐PPCM (n = 72) patients and healthy pregnancy‐matched women from Germany (n = 56) and South Africa (n = 40) were enrolled. Circulating levels of procollagen type‐I (PINP) and type‐III (PIIINP) N‐terminal propeptides, soluble ST2, galectin‐3, and full‐length and cleaved osteopontin (OPN) were measured at diagnosis (baseline) and 6 months of follow‐up. Both cohorts received standard heart failure therapy while anticoagulation therapy was applied in 100% of G‐PPCM but only in 7% of SA‐PPCM patients. In G‐PPCM patients, baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was lower, and outcome was better (baseline LVEF, 24 ± 8%, full recovery: 52%, mortality: 0%) compared with SA‐PPCM patients (baseline LVEF: 30 ± 9%, full recovery: 32%, mortality: 11%; P < 0.05). At baseline, PINP/PIIINP ratio was lower in SA‐PPCM and higher in G‐PPCM compared with respective controls, whereas total OPN was elevated in both collectives. Cleaved OPN, which increases PIIINP levels, is generated by thrombin and was reduced in patients receiving anticoagulation therapy. High baseline galectin‐3, soluble ST2, and OPN levels were associated with poor outcome in all PPCM patients. Conclusions SA‐PPCM patients displayed a more profibrotic biomarker profile, which was associated with a less favourable outcome despite better cardiac function at baseline, compared with G‐PPCM patients. Use of bromocriptine and anticoagulation therapy in G‐PPCM may counteract fibrosis and may in part be responsible for their better outcome.