Search

Your search keyword '"Oncogenesis, Stress, Signaling (OSS)"' showing total 2 results
Start Over Author "Oncogenesis, Stress, Signaling (OSS)" Publisher wiley
2 results on '"Oncogenesis, Stress, Signaling (OSS)"'

1. Chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma: A retrospective multicenter AGEO study

Author

Marie Auvray Kuentz, Vincent Hautefeuille, Louis de Mestier, Clélia Coutzac, Thierry Lecomte, Victor Nardon, Pascal Artru, Anthony Turpin, Antoine Drouillard, David Malka, My‐Linh Tran‐Minh, Isabelle Trouilloud, Astrid Lièvre, Nicolas Williet, Simon Pernot, Yann Touchefeu, Julien Taieb, Pascal Hammel, Aziz Zaanan, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou [APHP] (HEGP), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO), CHU Amiens-Picardie, Hôpital Beaujon [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), Centre Léon Bérard [Lyon], Nutrition, croissance et cancer (U 1069) (N2C), Université de Tours (UT)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Hôpital privé Jean Mermoz [Lyon], CHU Lille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand (CHU Dijon), Institut Gustave Roussy (IGR), Département de médecine oncologique, CRLCC Paul Strauss, Hopital Saint-Louis [AP-HP] (AP-HP), CHU Saint-Antoine [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU), CHU Pontchaillou [Rennes], Oncogenesis, Stress, Signaling (OSS), Université de Rennes (UR)-CRLCC Eugène Marquis (CRLCC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne [CHU Saint-Etienne] (CHU ST-E), Institut Bergonié [Bordeaux], UNICANCER, Centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes (CHU Nantes), Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine - CARPEM [Paris], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Hôpital Cochin [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-CHU Necker - Enfants Malades [AP-HP], and None

Subjects
Cancer Research, Oncology, adenosquamous carcinoma, advanced disease, pancreatic cancer, [SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, chemotherapy
Abstract

International audience; Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) account for < 5% of pancreatic malignancies. The efficacy of modern chemotherapy regimens in patients with advanced PASC is unknown. Patients with advanced PASC from 2008 to 2021 were consecutively included in this retrospective multicenter study. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method. Ninety-four PASC from 16 French centers were included (median age, 67.3 years; males, 56.4%; metastatic disease, 85.1%). The first-line treatment was chemotherapy for 79 patients (84.0%) (37 FOLFIRINOX (FX), 7 Gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel (GN) and 35 for all other regimen) or best supportive care (BSC) alone for 15 patients (16.0%). No significant difference was observed between FX and GN in terms of PFS (P = .67) or OS (P = .5). Modern regimens pooled together (FX and GN) as compared to all others chemotherapy regimens showed an improvement of overall response rate (39.5% and 9.7%, P = .002), PFS (median, 7.8 vs 4.7 months, P = .02) and OS (median, 12.7 vs 9.2 months, P = .35). This large study evaluating first-line treatment regimens in advanced PASC suggests that modern regimens as FX or GN may be preferable to all other chemotherapy regimens. These results deserve confirmation in prospective studies.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Prognostic impact of cytoreductive surgery conducted with primary intent, versus cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in the management of patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancers: a multicentre, propensity score‐matched study from the <scp>FRANCOGYN</scp> group

Author

Henri Wohrer, Meriem Koual, Enrica Bentivegna, Louise Benoit, Marie Metairie, Pierre‐Adrien Bolze, Yohan Kerbage, Emilie Raimond, Cherif Akladios, Xavier Carcopino, Geoffroy Canlorbe, Jennifer Uzan, Vincent Lavoue, Camille Mimoun, Cyrille Huchon, Martin Koskas, Hélène Costaz, François Margueritte, Yohann Dabi, Cyril Touboul, Sofiane Bendifallah, Lobna Ouldamer, Nicolas Delanoy, Huyen‐Thu Nguyen‐Xuan, Anne‐Sophie Bats, Henri Azaïs, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou [APHP] (HEGP), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO), Toxicité environnementale, cibles thérapeutiques, signalisation cellulaire (T3S - UMR_S 1124), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Institut méditerranéen de biodiversité et d'écologie marine et continentale (IMBE), Avignon Université (AU)-Aix Marseille Université (AMU)-Institut de recherche pour le développement [IRD] : UMR237-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Sorbonne Université (SU), CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Oncogenesis, Stress, Signaling (OSS), Université de Rennes (UR)-CRLCC Eugène Marquis (CRLCC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), CHU Pontchaillou [Rennes], Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers (CRC (UMR_S_1138 / U1138)), École Pratique des Hautes Études (EPHE), Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Université Paris sciences et lettres (PSL)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Université Paris Cité (UPCité), Cancer Research and Personalized Medicine - CARPEM [Paris], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ouest - Hôpitaux Universitaires Île de France Ouest (HUPO)-Hôpital Cochin [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Université Paris Descartes - Paris 5 (UPD5)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-CHU Necker - Enfants Malades [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP), and None

Subjects
epithelial ovarian cancer, interval cytoreductive surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology, [SDV.CAN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Cancer, primary cytoreductive surgery, propensity score, neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Abstract

International audience; Objective: To compare survival and morbidity rates between primary cytoreductive surgery (pCRS) and interval cytoreductive surgery (iCRS) for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), using a propensity score.Design: We conducted a propensity score-matched cohort study, using data from the FRANCOGYN cohort.Setting: Retrospective, multicentre study of data from patients followed in 15 French department specialized in the treatment of ovarian cancer.Sample: Patients included were those with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or IV EOC, with peritoneal carcinomatosis, having undergone CRS.Methods: The propensity score was designed using pre-therapeutic variables associated with both treatment allocation and overall survival (OS).Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was OS. Secondary outcomes included recurrence-free survival (RFS), quality of CRS and other variables related to surgical morbidity.Results: A total of 513 patients were included. Among these, 334 could be matched, forming 167 pairs. No difference in OS was found (hazard ratio, HR = 0.8, p = 0.32). There was also no difference in RFS (median = 26 months in both groups) nor in the rate of CRS leaving no macroscopic residual disease (pCRS 85%, iCRS 81.4%, p = 0.76). The rates of gastrointestinal tract resections, stoma, postoperative complications and hospital stay were significantly higher in the pCRS group.Conclusions: Analysis of groups of patients made comparable by propensity score matching showed no difference in survival, but lower postoperative morbidity in patients treated with iCRS.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results