Search

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) clones directed against autologous renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines were generated by mixed lymphocyte/tumor-cell culture (MLTC) using peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL). A CD8+, CD4- CTL clone MZ1257-CTL 5/30 with high cytolytic activity for the autologous tumor cell line MZ1257-RCC was established. No lysis of the autologous EBV-transformed B lymphocytes (EBV-B) or K562 cells was observed. A panel of HLA-A2-matched allogeneic RCC lines was recognized by CTL 5/30. Further specificity analysis showed a cross-reactivity with HLA-A2-matched allogeneic tumor cells of various origins, especially melanoma. CTL 5/30 was also cross-reactive with several HLA-A2-positive allogeneic normal kidney cells in culture. The restriction element identified for CTL 5/30 was HLA-A2, as shown by blocking of cytotoxicity using an anti-HLA-A2 monoclonal antibody (MAb) and by resistance of an HLA-A2-negative melanoma variant SK29-MEL. 1.22 against lysis by CTL 5/30. In this report we demonstrate HLA-A2-restricted recognition of a T-cell-defined antigen on autologous renal-cancer cells. This antigen is also expressed and recognized in association with HLA-A2 on normal kidney cells in culture and other HLA-A2-positive tumor cells. It may therefore be a normal differentiation antigen to which tolerance is incomplete in the renal-cell cancer system investigated.

Previous research on the effects of adjuvant treatment for women with operable breast cancer focused exclusively on disease-free and overall survival. In this study we evaluate life quality of premenopausal node-positive breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for at least three months. For the first time, a modified latent variable model is used to assess treatment outcome in a prospective clinical trial. This poses a number of econometric problems which did not occur in the preceding studies. One of them is how to deal with patients whose records are incomplete. The data are provided by the International Breast Cancer Study Group (study VI). The results indicate that the lowest dose treatment improves life quality faster than the remaining three alternatives. At the end of the 24 months observation period no significant differences between the four treatment options remain. Although the lowest dose treatment is also the least costly no definite conclusion regarding cost-effectiveness can be drawn at this stage since survival data is not yet available.