Search

Acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) is a rare metabolic disease caused by mutations within the hydroxymethylbilane synthase gene. Previous studies have reported increased levels of plasma total homocysteine (tHcy) in symptomatic AIP patients. In this study, we present long-term data for tHcy and related parameters for an AIP patient cohort (n = 37) in different clinical disease-states. In total, 25 patients (68%) presented with hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy; tHcy > 15 μmol/L) during the observation period. HHcy was more frequent in AIP patients with recurrent disease receiving heme arginate, than in nonrecurrent (median tHcy: 21.6 μmol/L; range: 10-129 vs median tHcy: 14.5 μmol/L; range 6-77). Long-term serial analyses showed a high within-person tHcy variation, especially among the recurrent patients (coefficient of variation: 16.4%-78.8%). HHcy was frequently associated with low blood concentrations of pyridoxal-5'-phosphate and folate, while cobalamin concentration and the allele distribution of the methylene-tetrahydrofolate-reductase gene were normal. Strikingly, 6 out of the 9 recurrent patients who were later included in a regime of givosiran, a small-interfering RNA that effectively reduced recurrent attacks, showed further increased tHcy (median tHcy in 9 patients: 105 μmol/L; range 16-212). Screening of amino acids in plasma by liquid-chromatography showed co-increased levels of methionine (median 71 μmol/L; range 23-616; normal <40), suggestive of acquired deficiency of cystathionine-β-synthase. The kynunerine/tryptophan ratio in plasma was, however, normal, indicating a regular metabolism of tryptophan by heme-dependent enzymes. In conclusion, even if HHcy was observed in AIP patients receiving heme arginate, givosiran induced an aggravation of the dysregulation, causing a co-increase of tHcy and methionine resembling classic homocystinuria., (© 2021 SSIEM.)

Background: TAS-102, a novel antimetabolite, is approved for treatment of refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This study sought to determine whether the addition of TAS-102 to oxaliplatin (TAS-OX) was safe and effective in metastatic CRC previously treated with oxaliplatin., Methods: This investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm phase 1b study enrolled patients with metastatic CRC previously treated with 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. In dose escalation, TAS-102 was given at 3 dose levels: 25, 30, and 35 mg/m 2 twice daily on day 1 to day 5 with 85 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin on day 1 in 14-day cycles. The primary endpoint of dose escalation was the recommended dose for expansion, and in dose expansion, the primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST, version 1.1)., Results: Forty-one patients were treated with TAS-OX. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in the 11 patients treated in escalation. The recommended dose for expansion was 35 mg/m 2 TAS-102 twice daily on day 1 to day 5 in combination with 85 mg/m 2 oxaliplatin on day 1 in 14-day cycles. In the intention-to-treat population, the ORR was 2.4% (95% CI, 0%-12.9%) with 1 of 41 patients having a partial response, although 12 (29%) had tumor shrinkage. The median progression-free survival was 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.4-4.8 months) and median overall survival was 6.8 months (95% CI, 5.7-10 months)., Conclusions: TAS-OX is safe with no unexpected toxicities at standard doses of each agent. The combination did not result in a clinically meaningful ORR, although progression-free survival and overall survival were encouraging in this heavily pretreated population., Lay Summary: For metastatic colorectal cancer, the treatment combination of TAS-102 and oxaliplatin was found to be well-tolerated and revealed no unexpected side effects. Twelve of 41 patients had reductions in the size of their tumor, and the study treatment delayed the time to tumor growth as opposed to what would be expected., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

The impact of repeated daily 500-mg fedratinib (an oral selective Janus kinase [JAK] 2 inhibitor) on QTc and other electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters was assessed in 60 patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients received placebo on day 1 and fedratinib 500 mg daily for 14 days. Concentration-QTc analysis was performed with change-from-baseline QTc corrected by Fridericia's formula (ΔQTcF) as the dependent variable. Fedratinib median time to maximum plasma concentration (C max ) was observed 3 hours postdose on day 15. The largest difference between means for fedratinib and placebo was 0.5 bpm (90%CI, -2.75 to 3.72 bpm) for heart rate (3 hours postdose) and 4.3 milliseconds (90%CI, 1.04-7.60 milliseconds) for QTcF (4 hours postdose). The estimated slope of the fedratinib concentration-QTcF relationship was shallow and not statistically significant: -0.0005 milliseconds per ng/mL (90%CI, -0.00145 to 0.00050 milliseconds per ng/mL). Predicted fedratinib placebo-corrected ΔQTcF was 0.6 milliseconds (90%CI, -1.80 to 2.93 milliseconds) at the geometric mean of the observed C max (3615 ng/mL). Fedratinib did not affect PR or QRS intervals. No patients had QTcF > 60 milliseconds, and no patients experienced QTcF ≥ 500 milliseconds. Fedratinib did not cause clinically relevant ECG effects or QTc prolongation. Safety findings were consistent with the known safety profile., (© 2020, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Parsaclisib, a selective, potent phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase delta inhibitor being developed for the treatment of cancer and autoimmune diseases, is primarily metabolized by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4. This study assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of parsaclisib alone or combined with itraconazole (potent CYP3A inhibitor) or rifampin (potent CYP3A4 inducer) in healthy participants. In this open-label, fixed-sequence study, cohort 1 received oral parsaclisib 10 mg once daily on days 1 and 8 and oral itraconazole 200 mg once daily on days 4-11; cohort 2 received oral parsaclisib 20 mg once daily on days 1 and 11 and oral rifampin 600 mg once daily on days 4-12. Parsaclisib plasma concentration was tested and PK parameters calculated by noncompartmental analysis. Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and 2-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated by 2-factor analysis of variance. Thirty-six healthy participants were enrolled (18 per cohort). Parsaclisib maximum plasma drug concentration (C max ) and area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC 0-∞ ) were increased by 21% and 107% with concomitant itraconazole versus parsaclisib alone (GMR, 1.21; 90%CI, 1.14-1.29; and 2.07; 90%CI, 1.97-2.17, respectively). Parsaclisib C max and AUC were reduced by 43% and 77%, respectively, with concomitant rifampin versus parsaclisib alone (GMR, 0.57; 90%CI, 0.53-0.60; and 0.23; 90%CI, 0.21-0.24, respectively). Headache was the most common adverse event, reported by 13.9% of participants (all in cohort 2). Single-dose parsaclisib alone or combined with itraconazole or rifampin appeared safe and well tolerated in healthy participants. Parsaclisib dose adjustment may be necessary with concomitant administration of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or inducers., (© 2020 Incyte Corporation. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

The effects of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of rovatirelin were investigated in an open-label, single-sequence drug-drug interaction study in 16 healthy subjects. Subjects were administered a single oral dose of rovatirelin (1.6 mg) on day 1 and day 15. From day 8 through 16, subjects received daily oral doses of itraconazole (200 mg/day). Concentrations of rovatirelin and (thiazolylalanyl)methylpyrrolidine (TAMP), the major metabolite of rovatirelin formed by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4/5, were determined in plasma and urine. Pharmacokinetic parameters were used to evaluate the drug-drug interaction potential of rovatirelin as a victim. With coadministration, maximum concentration (C max ) and area under the concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC inf ) of rovatirelin increased 3.05-fold and 2.82-fold, respectively, and the 90% confidence intervals of the ratios for C max (2.64-3.52) and AUC inf (2.47-3.23) did not fall within the 0.8-1.25 boundaries. Urinary excretion of rovatirelin increased at almost the same ratio as the AUC inf ratio with coadministration; however, renal clearance did not change. C max , AUC inf , and urinary excretion of TAMP were decreased by coadministration. Itraconazole has the potential to inhibit drug transport via intestinal P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP); therefore, substrate assessments of rovatirelin for the 2 transporters were evaluated using Caco-2 cell monolayers. In vitro studies showed that rovatirelin is a substrate for P-gp but not for BCRP. The current study shows that itraconazole's effect on rovatirelin pharmacokinetics is mediated through inhibition of CYP3A4/5 and intestinal P-gp., (© 2020, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background: Kidney transplantation is the preferred management for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, it is often complicated by worsening or new-onset diabetes. The safety and efficacy of glucose-lowering agents after kidney transplantation is largely unknown. This is an update of a review first published in 2017., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents for treating pre-existing and new onset diabetes in people who have undergone kidney transplantation., Search Methods: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 16 January 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov., Selection Criteria: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and cross-over studies examining head-to-head comparisons of active regimens of glucose-lowering therapy or active regimen compared with placebo/standard care in patients who have received a kidney transplant and have diabetes were eligible for inclusion., Data Collection and Analysis: Four authors independently assessed study eligibility and quality and performed data extraction. Continuous outcomes were expressed as post-treatment mean differences (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Adverse events were expressed as post-treatment absolute risk differences (RD). Dichotomous clinical outcomes were presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Main Results: Ten studies (21 records, 603 randomised participants) were included - three additional studies (five records) since our last review. Four studies compared more intensive versus less intensive insulin therapy; two studies compared dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to placebo; one study compared DPP-4 inhibitors to insulin glargine; one study compared sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors to placebo; and two studies compared glitazones and insulin to insulin therapy alone. The majority of studies had an unclear to a high risk of bias. There were no studies examining the effects of biguanides, glinides, GLP-1 agonists, or sulphonylureas. Compared to less intensive insulin therapy, it is unclear if more intensive insulin therapy has an effect on transplant or graft survival (4 studies, 301 participants: RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.32 to 3.94; I 2 = 49%; very low certainty evidence), delayed graft function (2 studies, 153 participants: RR 0.63, 0.42 to 0.93; I 2 = 0%; very low certainty evidence), HbA1c (1 study, 16 participants; very low certainty evidence), fasting blood glucose (1 study, 24 participants; very low certainty evidence), kidney function markers (1 study, 26 participants; very low certainty evidence), death (any cause) (3 studies, 208 participants" RR 0.68, 0.29 to 1.58; I 2 = 0%; very low certainty evidence), hypoglycaemia (4 studies, 301 participants; very low certainty evidence) and medication discontinuation due to adverse effects (1 study, 60 participants; very low certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, it is unclear whether DPP-4 inhibitors have an effect on hypoglycaemia and medication discontinuation (2 studies, 51 participants; very low certainty evidence). However, DPP-4 inhibitors may reduce HbA1c and fasting blood glucose but not kidney function markers (1 study, 32 participants; low certainty evidence). Compared to insulin glargine, it is unclear if DPP-4 inhibitors have an effect on HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, hypoglycaemia or discontinuation due to adverse events (1 study, 45 participants; very low certainty evidence). Compared to placebo, SGLT2 inhibitors probably do not affect kidney graft survival (1 study, 44 participants; moderate certainty evidence), but may reduce HbA1c without affecting fasting blood glucose and eGFR long-term (1 study, 44 participants, low certainty evidence). SGLT2 inhibitors probably do not increase hypoglycaemia, and probably have little or no effect on medication discontinuation due to adverse events. However, all participants discontinuing SGLT2 inhibitors had urinary tract infections (1 study, 44 participants, moderate certainty evidence). Compared to insulin therapy alone, it is unclear if glitazones added to insulin have an effect on HbA1c or kidney function markers (1 study, 62 participants; very low certainty evidence). However, glitazones may make little or no difference to fasting blood glucose (2 studies, 120 participants; low certainty evidence), and medication discontinuation due to adverse events (1 study, 62 participants; low certainty evidence). No studies of DPP-4 inhibitors, or glitazones reported effects on transplant or graft survival, delayed graft function or death (any cause)., Authors' Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents in the treatment of pre-existing and new-onset diabetes in kidney transplant recipients is questionable. Evidence from existing studies examining the effect of intensive insulin therapy, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT inhibitors and glitazones is mostly of low to very low certainty. Appropriately blinded, larger, and higher quality RCTs are needed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of contemporary glucose-lowering agents in the kidney transplant population., (Copyright © 2020 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

A fixed-dose combination of glecaprevir and pibrentasvir is approved for treatment of chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1-6. Three phase 1 open-label studies were conducted in healthy volunteers to evaluate the potential for clinically relevant drug-drug interactions of the glecaprevir 300-mg and pibrentasvir 120-mg combination with the immunosuppressants tacrolimus (1 mg) or cyclosporine (100 and 400 mg). Glecaprevir and pibrentasvir exposure was unaffected by tacrolimus, whereas the tacrolimus area under the curve (AUC) value was 45% higher with glecaprevir and pibrentasvir. Cyclosporine 100 mg had a limited effect on glecaprevir or pibrentasvir exposure (≤37% AUC increase), but cyclosporine 400 mg increased exposure of both glecaprevir and pibrentasvir (410% and 93% AUC increase, respectively). Cyclosporine concentration was unaffected by glecaprevir and pibrentasvir at either cyclosporine dose (≤14% AUC change). Adverse events were all grade 1 (mild), with the most common nausea and flushing attributed to cyclosporine. Findings from these studies supported evaluation of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in HCV-infected kidney and liver transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus without additional dose adjustment or receiving cyclosporine up to 100 mg per day., (© 2019, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

This phase 1 study characterized the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of miridesap (GSK2315698) following an intravenous (IV) infusion in healthy Japanese men. Subjects in Cohort 1 received 1-hour IV infusions of 10, 20, and 40 mg of miridesap or placebo, and subjects in Cohort 2 received a 15-hour IV infusion of 20 mg/h of miridesap or placebo. No treatment-related adverse events were reported. No new safety signals were identified for either vital signs or clinical laboratory parameters. A dose-dependent increase was observed in miridesap exposure (area under the concentration-time curve and maximum observed drug concentration) in the 10 to 40 mg/h dose range after a 1-hour IV infusion of miridesap. Rapid depletion of circulating serum amyloid P component was observed after the initiation of miridesap infusion. Serum amyloid P component concentrations fell in a dose-dependent manner following administration of miridesap., (© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Alicapistat is an orally active selective inhibitor of calpain 1 and 2 whose overactivation has been linked to Alzheimer disease (AD). Three studies were conducted in healthy subjects (18-55 years), 1 in healthy elderly subjects (≥65 years), and 1 in patients with mild to moderate AD. Four studies assessed pharmacokinetics, 1 study in healthy subjects assessed pharmacodynamics (sleep parameters, particularly rapid eye movement [REM], as a measure of central nervous system [CNS] penetration and activity), and all studies assessed safety. Participants received single doses or multiple twice-daily doses of alicapistat for up to 14 days. Maximum alicapistat plasma concentrations were reached in 2 to 5 hours; half-life was 7 to 12 hours postdose. Alicapistat exposure was dose proportional in the alicapistat 50- to 1000-mg dose range. Exposure of the alicapistat R,S diastereomer was approximately 2-fold greater than exposure of the R,R diastereomer in healthy young and elderly subjects and patients with AD. Alicapistat at 400- or 800-mg twice-daily doses had no effect on REM sleep parameters, whereas the active control, donepezil at 10 mg twice daily, affected sleep parameters. Across all trials, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar in the placebo and alicapistat groups. There were no clinically significant changes in vital signs and laboratory measurements. The lack of an effect of alicapistat on sleep suggests that concentrations in the CNS were inadequate or that preclinical studies do not predict alicapistat effects in humans., (© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

The orexin system regulates sleep and arousal and is targeted by ACT-541468, a new dual orexin receptor antagonist (DORA). Healthy male subjects received a single oral dose of 5-200 mg to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), mass balance, metabolism, and absolute bioavailability utilizing a 14 C-labeled, orally and intravenously (i.v.) administered microtracer. The drug was safe and well tolerated; the PK profile was characterized by quick absorption and elimination, with median time to reach maximum concentration (t max ) of 0.8-2.8 h and geometric mean terminal half-life (t 1/2 ) of 5.9-8.8 h. Clear dose-related effects on the central nervous system were observed at ≥25 mg, indicating a suitable PK-PD profile for a sleep-promoting drug, allowing for rapid onset and duration of action limited to the intended use. This comprehensive first-in-human study created a wealth of data, while saving resources in drug development., (© 2018 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Background: Kidney transplantation is the preferred form of kidney replacement therapy for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and is often complicated by worsening or new-onset diabetes. Management of hyperglycaemia is important to reduce post-transplant and diabetes-related complications. The safety and efficacy of glucose-lowering agents after kidney transplantation is largely unknown., Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for lowering glucose levels in patients who have undergone kidney transplantation and have diabetes., Search Methods: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 15 April 2016 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE; handsearching conference proceedings; and searching the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov., Selection Criteria: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and cross-over studies examining head-to-head comparisons of active regimens of glucose-lowering therapy or active regimen compared with placebo/standard care in patients who have received a kidney transplant and have diabetes were eligible for inclusion., Data Collection and Analysis: Two authors independently assessed study eligibility and quality and performed data extraction. Continuous outcomes were expressed as post-treatment mean differences (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Adverse events were expressed as post-treatment absolute risk differences (RD). Dichotomous clinical outcomes were presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI)., Main Results: We included seven studies that involved a total of 399 kidney transplant recipients. All included studies had observed heterogeneity in the patient population, interventions and measured outcomes or missing data (which was unavailable despite correspondence with authors). Many studies had incompletely reported methodology preventing meta-analysis and leading to low confidence in treatment estimates.Three studies with 241 kidney transplant recipients examined the use of more intensive compared to less intensive insulin therapy in kidney transplant recipients with pre-existing type 1 or 2 diabetes. Evidence for the effects of more intensive compared to less intensive insulin therapy on transplant graft survival, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, all cause mortality and adverse effects including hypoglycaemia was of very low quality. More intensive versus less intensive insulin therapy resulted in no difference in transplant or graft survival over three to five years in one study while another study showed that more intensive versus less intensive insulin therapy resulted in more rejection events over the three year follow-up (11 events in total; 9 in the more intensive group, P = 0.01). One study showed that more intensive insulin therapy resulted in a lower mean HbA1c (10 ± 0.8% versus 13 ± 0.9%) and lower fasting blood glucose (7.22 ± 0.5 mmol/L versus 13.44 ± 1.22 mmol/L) at 13 months compared with standard insulin therapy. Another study showed no difference between more intensive compared to less intensive insulin therapy on all-cause mortality over a five year follow-up period. All studies showed either an increased frequency of hypoglycaemia or severe hypoglycaemia episodes.Three studies with a total of 115 transplant recipients examined the use of DPP4 inhibitors for new-onset diabetes after transplantation. Evidence for the treatment effect of DPP4 inhibitors on transplant or graft survival, HbA1c and fasting blood glucose levels, all cause mortality, and adverse events including hypoglycaemia was of low quality. One study comparing vildagliptin to placebo and another comparing sitagliptin to placebo showed no difference in transplant or graft survival over two to four months of follow-up. One study comparing vildagliptin to placebo showed no significant change in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline (1.9 ± 10.3 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P = 0.48 and 2.1 ± 6.1 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P = 0.22) and no deaths, in either treatment group over three months of follow-up. One study comparing vildagliptin to placebo showed a lower HbA1c level (mean ± SD) (6.3 ± 0.5% versus versus 6.7 ± 0.6%, P = 0.03) and trend towards a greater lowering of fasting blood glucose (-0.91 ± -0.92 mmol/L versus vs -0.19 ± 1.16 mmol/L, P = 0.08) with vildagliptin. One study comparing sitagliptin to insulin glargine showed an equivalent lowering of HbA1c (-0.6 ± 0.5% versus -0.6 ± 0.6%, P = NS) and fasting blood glucose (4.92 ± 1.42 versus 4.76 ± 1.09 mmol/L, P = NS) with sitagliptin. For the outcome of hypoglycaemia, one study comparing vildagliptin to placebo reported no episodes of hypoglycaemia, one study comparing sitagliptin to insulin glargine reported fewer episodes of hypoglycaemia with sitagliptin (3/28 patients; 10.7% versus 5/28; 17.9%) and one cross-over study of sitagliptin and placebo reported two episodes of asymptomatic moderate hypoglycaemia (2 to 3.9 mmol/L) when sitagliptin was administered with glipizide. All three studies reported no drug interactions between DPP4 inhibitors and the immunosuppressive agents taken.Evidence for the treatment effect of pioglitazone for treating pre-existing diabetes was of low quality. One study with 62 transplant recipients compared the use of pioglitazone with insulin to insulin alone for treating pre-existing diabetes. Pioglitazone resulted in a lower HbA1c level (mean ± SD) (-1.21 ± 1.2 versus 0.39 ± 1%, P < 0.001) but had no effects on fasting blood glucose (6.58 ± 2.71 versus 7.28 ± 2.78 mmol/L, P = 0.14 ), and change in creatinine (3.54 ± 15.03 versus 10.61 ± 18.56 mmol/L, P = 0.53) and minimal adverse effects (no episodes of hypoglycaemia, three dropped out due to mild to moderate lower extremity oedema, cyclosporin levels were not affected)., Authors' Conclusions: Evidence concerning the efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents for treating pre-existing and new-onset diabetes in kidney transplant recipients is limited. Existing studies examine more intensive versus less intensive insulin therapy, and the use of DPP4 inhibitors and pioglitazone. The safety and efficacy of more intensive compared to less intensive insulin therapy is very uncertain and the safety and efficacy of DPP4 inhibitors and pioglitazone is uncertain, due to data being limited and of poor quality. Additional RCTs are required to clarify the safety and efficacy of current glucose-lowering agents for kidney transplant recipients with diabetes.

This article presents information on the predominant synthetic cathinones used in the Western world, mephedrone and methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV). Synthetic cathinones are commonly used drugs of abuse in the United States and Europe, with numerous cases of patient harm and death. Patients exhibit many neurological, cardiovascular, and muscular adverse events and frequently require therapy to control psychotic or agitated states and acute kidney injury resulting from myopathy or rhabdomyolysis. There are potential genetic polymorphisms and drug interactions that might accentuate risk, but there are no studies evaluating to what extent this occurs or if it is clinically relevant. Clinicians should be aware of the known pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and reports of effects to detect potential issues and treat patients presenting with these adverse effects., (© 2016, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Fedratinib (SAR302503/TG101348) is a Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)-selective inhibitor developed for treatment of patients with myelofibrosis. The effect of food intake on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) and tolerability of single-dose fedratinib was investigated in two Phase I studies (FED12258: 100 mg or 500 mg under fasted or fed [high-fat breakfast] conditions; ALI13451: 500 mg under fasted or fed [low- or high-fat breakfast] conditions) in healthy male subjects. At the 500 mg dose the fed:fasted ratio estimate for area under the plasma concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity was 0.96 (100 mg; high-fat/fasted), 1.19-1.24 (500 mg; high-fat/fasted), and 1.22 (500 mg; low-fat/fasted). Fedratinib 500 mg attained peak plasma concentration 4 hours after a high-fat breakfast and 2-2.5 hours after a low-fat breakfast or under fasted conditions; terminal half-life was 76-88 hours (fasted) and 73-78 hours (fed). The most frequent adverse events were mild gastrointestinal toxicities, the incidence of which decreased following a high-fat breakfast compared with both fasted and low-fat breakfast conditions (17%, 67%, and 59% of subjects, respectively, in ALI13451). In conclusion, food intake had minimal impact on the PKs of fedratinib, and the tolerability of this drug was improved when taken following a high-fat breakfast., (© 2014, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background and Purpose: For patients experiencing inadequate analgesia and intolerable opioid-related side effects on one strong opioid analgesic, pain relief with acceptable tolerability is often achieved by rotation to a second strong opioid. These observations suggest subtle pharmacodynamic differences between opioids in vivo. This study in rats was designed to assess differences between opioids in their in vivo profiles., Experimental Approach: Male Sprague Dawley rats were given single i.c.v. bolus doses of morphine, morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G), fentanyl, oxycodone, buprenorphine, DPDPE ([D-penicillamine(2,5) ]-enkephalin) or U69,593. Antinociception, constipation and respiratory depression were assessed using the warm water tail-flick test, the castor oil-induced diarrhoea test and whole body plethysmography respectively., Key Results: These opioid agonists produced dose-dependent antinociception, constipation and respiratory depression. For antinociception, morphine, fentanyl and oxycodone were full agonists, buprenorphine and M6G were partial agonists, whereas DPDPE and U69,593 had low potency. For constipation, M6G, fentanyl and buprenorphine were full agonists, oxycodone was a partial agonist, morphine produced a bell-shaped dose-response curve, whereas DPDPE and U69,593 were inactive. For respiratory depression, morphine, M6G, fentanyl and buprenorphine were full agonists, oxycodone was a partial agonist, whereas DPDPE and U69,593 were inactive. The respiratory depressant effects of fentanyl and oxycodone were of short duration, whereas morphine, M6G and buprenorphine evoked prolonged respiratory depression., Conclusion and Implications: For the seven opioids we assessed, no two had the same profile for evoking antinociception, constipation and respiratory depression, suggesting that these effects are differentially regulated. Our findings may explain the clinical success of 'opioid rotation'., Linked Articles: This article is part of a themed section on Opioids: New Pathways to Functional Selectivity. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2015.172.issue-2., (© 2014 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Accumulating evidence indicates that selective antagonism of kappa opioid receptors may provide therapeutic benefit in the treatment of major depressive disorder, anxiety disorders, and substance use disorders. LY2456302 is a high-affinity, selective kappa opioid antagonist that demonstrates >30-fold functional selectivity over mu and delta opioid receptors. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of LY2456302 were investigated following single oral doses (2-60 mg), multiple oral doses (2, 10, and 35 mg), and when co-administered with ethanol. Plasma concentrations of LY2456302 were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Safety analyses were conducted on all enrolled subjects. LY2456302 doses were well-tolerated with no clinically significant findings. No safety concerns were seen on co-administration with ethanol. No evidence for an interaction between LY2456302 and ethanol on cognitive-motor performance was detected. LY2456302 displayed rapid oral absorption and a terminal half-life of approximately 30-40 hours. Plasma exposure of LY2456302 increased proportionally with increasing doses and reached steady state after 6-8 days of once-daily dosing. Steady-state PK of LY2456302 were not affected by coadministration of a single dose of ethanol. No clinically important changes in maximum concentration (Cmax ) or AUC of ethanol (in the presence of LY2456302) were observed., (© 2014, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

A double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled, randomized, single-ascending-dose study was conducted to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of ACT-462206, a novel dual orexin receptor antagonist. Healthy male subjects received single oral doses of 5, 25, 100, 200, 400, 1,000, and 1,500 mg ACT-462206 (n = 6 per group) or placebo (n = 2 per group). In addition, subjects in the 400-mg group received a single oral dose of 400 mg almorexant (two-way crossover). ACT-462206 was generally well tolerated. Sleepiness, headache, and fatigue were the most frequently reported adverse events. The incidence of sleepiness appeared dose-dependent. ACT-462206 was absorbed with a median tmax of 1.5-4.0 hours. The elimination half-life varied from 4.8 to 11.2 hours. A clinically relevant reduction in vigilance and attention, alertness, and motor coordination was recorded at ACT-462206 doses ≥200 mg. The onset was between 20 and 45 minutes after drug intake, the maximum effect between 1 and 2 hours after drug administration, and these impairing effects largely disappeared within 8 hours post-dose. Doses of 400-1,000 mg ACT-462206 were similarly efficacious to 400 mg almorexant, with a trend for an earlier onset of action with ACT-462206. The present results confirm the activity of ACT-462206 as an orexin antagonist., (© 2014, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Fedratinib (SAR302503/TG101348) is a Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)-selective inhibitor in clinical development for the treatment of myelofibrosis. In this randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 1 study, the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of ascending single doses of fedratinib (10-680 mg) were assessed in healthy male subjects. Fedratinib was rapidly absorbed, with peak plasma concentration observed approximately 3 hours after dosing. The mean terminal half-life of fedratinib was approximately 67 hours, which was unaffected by dose. Fedratinib exposure increased in a greater than dose-proportional manner. Suppression of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) phosphorylation, indicative of JAK2 inhibition, was observed at 3 hours post-dose for subjects in the 300, 500, and 680 mg groups, with the level of suppression increasing with dose. The relationship between fedratinib exposure and suppression of STAT3 phosphorylation was described using an inhibitory effect sigmoid Emax model, with an EC50 of 1,210 ng/mL in healthy subjects. The most common adverse events were mild gastrointestinal toxicities., (© 2013, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Objective: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of eletriptan in treating migraine attacks occurring within the defined menstrual time period of 1 day before and 4 days after onset of menstruation (menses days -1 to +4) compared with attacks occurring during non-menstrual time periods (occurring outside of menses days -1 to +4)., Background: Migraine attacks during menses have been associated with longer duration, higher recurrence rates, greater treatment resistance, and greater functional disability than those not associated with menses. The efficacy of eletriptan in treating migraine attacks associated with menstruation vs those outside a defined menstrual period has not been evaluated., Methods: Data were pooled from 5 similarly designed, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of eletriptan 20 mg/40 mg/80 mg. Two groups were defined for this analysis: women with a single index migraine beginning during the menstrual (group 1) and non-menstrual (group 2) time periods. End points of interest were headache response at 2 hours, migraine recurrence and sustained responses for nausea, photo/phonophobia, and function. Logistic regression was used to compare group 1 vs group 2 and each eletriptan dose (20, 40, or 80 mg) vs. placebo. Adverse events were also assessed., Results: Of 3217 subjects pooled from 5 studies, 2216 women were either in group 1 (n = 630) or group 2 (n = 1586). Rates of headache response at 2 hours were similar in group 1 vs. group 2 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91, 1.36]; P = .2944). The rate of headache recurrence was significantly higher in group 1 vs group 2 (26.8% vs. 18.6%; OR = 1.67 [95% CI 1.23, 2.26]; P < .001). The odds of achieving sustained nausea responses were significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (OR = 0.70 [95% CI 0.54, 0.92]; P = .0097). There was no significant difference between group 1 and group 2 in the odds of achieving a sustained photo/phonophobia and functional response (OR = 0.96 [95% CI 0.77, 1.20]; P = .7269 and OR = 1.14 [95% CI 0.87, 1.50]; P = .3425, respectively). Adverse events were comparable between group 1 and group 2., Conclusions: Two-hour headache outcome measures were similar in women treated with eletriptan both within and outside of the defined menstrual time period (menses days -1 to +4). The main treatment differences between the 2 groups occurred 2-24 hours post-treatment, with higher recurrence rates and lower sustained response rates for nausea in the group treated during the menstrual time period., (© 2013 American Headache Society.)

Background: Endothelin-1 and the endothelin A (ET(A) ) receptor have been implicated in prostate cancer progression in bone. This study aimed to determine whether the specific ET(A) receptor antagonist, zibotentan, prolonged overall survival (OS) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases who were pain-free or mildly symptomatic for pain., Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to zibotentan 10 mg/day or placebo, plus standard prostate cancer treatment. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included times to pain progression, chemotherapy use, new bone metastases, and safety. Efficacy endpoints were analyzed using a log-rank test., Results: A total of 594 patients were randomized (zibotentan, n = 299; placebo, n = 295). Median OS was 24.5 months in zibotentan-treated patients versus 22.5 months for placebo, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (hazard ratio, 0.87; 95.2% confidence interval, 0.69-1.10; P = .240). No statistically significant differences were observed for any secondary efficacy endpoints. Peripheral edema (44%) and headache (31%) were the most commonly reported adverse events in the zibotentan group. Cardiac failure events were higher in the zibotentan group than placebo (any grade, 5.7% and 1.7%; Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade ≥3, 3.0% and 1.0%, respectively); these were manageable and reversible., Conclusions: In this large, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial, treatment with zibotentan 10 mg/day did not lead to a statistically significant improvement in OS in this patient population. Zibotentan had an acceptable safety profile., (Copyright © 2012 American Cancer Society.)

Purpose: Review all the individualized cases of adverse drug reaction (ADR) potentially related to buflomedil, a vasodilator with the indication for peripheral arterial disease (PAD), marketed in Europe since the 1970s but recently suspended by the European Medicines Agency., Methods: A review of all available individualised case safety data relating to oral buflomedil from the buflomedil global safety database (provided by the manufacturer of buflomedil), the worldwide published medical literature, toxicology/poison centres and regulatory authorities., Results: The main ADRs reported were in the cardiovascular (CVS) and nervous systems (NS), grouped under four (MedDRA) System Organ Classes (SOCs): (i) Cardiac disorders; (ii) Vascular disorders; (iii) Investigations; (iv) NS disorders. From an initial cumulative number of 1054 case reports, there were 401 cases of intentional overdose (IOD) of which 63 were fatal, and 137 cases of accidental overdose, with two fatalities, and 516 case reports of ADRs under normal conditions of use of the product at normal therapeutic dosage with 11 fatalities. Overdosage (intentional or accidental) represented 50.9% of cases, with 47.6% of patients <40 years of age. The indications for which these young patients were prescribed buflomedil were not reported in most cases., Conclusions: The main indication of buflomedil is PAD; however, because most cases of IOD occurred in people <40 years of age, where PAD is unlikely, it is possible that buflomedil was prescribed for other indications and/or that it was not directly prescribed to the end user, who rather gained access to the medication prescribed to family members or friends., (Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

This study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of single oral doses of R1663, a factor Xa inhibitor, in healthy volunteers. It was a single-blind, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled, dose escalation study in 33 healthy male volunteers aged 18 to 45 years. Each volunteer was dosed on 3 occasions with R1663 or placebo. Single oral doses of R1663 were safe and well tolerated. R1663 did not affect bleeding time. Pharmacodynamic effects (prothrombin time [PT], activated partial thromboplastin time [aPTT]), parameters of thrombogram, and anti-factor Xa activity) and plasma concentrations of R1663 were dose-dependent and showed low to moderate (<40%) intersubject and intrasubject variability. Maximum factor Xa inhibition was achieved 3 hours post dose (time to maximum concentration of R1663): clotting times were prolonged up to 2.5-fold, whereas endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and peak height were decreased by 48% and 85% from their baseline values, respectively. Pharmacodynamic parameters were strongly correlated to R1663 plasma concentrations, with IC50 values of 182 and 2680 ng/mL for peak height and ETP, respectively. Oral doses of R1663 up to 480 mg were well tolerated, with predictable pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics. R1663 prolonged clotting times (PT, aPTT) and inhibited thrombin generation without increasing bleeding time.

The pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of GSK1018921, a glycine transporter 1 (GlyT-1) inhibitor, were assessed in this first-time-in-human (FTIH) study. Single oral doses ranging from 0.5 to 280 mg and placebo were administered to 25 healthy subjects in a five-period, two-cohort, crossover study. GSK1018921 showed dose-proportional PK with a terminal half-life of ~17 h. The subjects reported dizziness with a dose-dependent frequency of 22-88% at doses of 70-280 mg. The time course of the dizziness paralleled the PK of the drug, with peak response at 2 h after the dose, consistent with time to maximum plasma concentration (T(max)). The dizziness was resolved by 10-12 h in all subjects. A Markov-chain logistic regression model was implemented in NONMEM to determine the probability of developing dizziness as a function of the plasma concentration of the compound. Frequency, onset (<1 h), and offset (4 h) were well described by the model. Exposure resulting in 80% receptor occupancy is predicted to be well tolerated.

Three phase 1 studies of eliglustat tartrate (Genz-112638), an oral inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase under development for treating Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1), evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics in healthy volunteers after escalating single doses (n = 99), escalating multiple doses (n = 36), and food (n = 24). Eliglustat tartrate was well tolerated at single doses ≤ 20 mg/kg and multiple doses ≤ 200 mg bid, with 50 mg bid producing plasma concentrations in the predicted therapeutic range. No serious adverse events occurred. Mild to moderate events of nausea, dizziness, and vomiting increased in frequency with escalating single and multiple doses. Single doses ≥ 10 mg/kg caused mild increases in electrocardiogram PR, QRS, and QT/QTc intervals. Single-dose pharmacokinetics showed dose linearity but not proportionality. Maximum plasma concentrations occurred at ~2 hours, followed by a monophasic decline with a ~6-hour terminal half-life. Unchanged drug in 8-hour urine collections was <1.5% of administered doses. Food did not significantly affect the rate or extent of absorption. Multiple-dose pharmacokinetics was nonlinear, showing higher than expected plasma drug concentrations. Steady state was reached ~60 hours after bid dosing. Higher drug exposure occurred in slower CYP2D6 metabolizers. Based on favorable results in healthy participants, a phase 2 trial of eliglustat tartrate was initiated in GD1 patients.

Objective: To prospectively evaluate the efficacy of perimenstrual prophylaxis with eletriptan to reduce headaches in women identified with menstrual migraine (MM)., Methods: Female migraineurs self-reporting a substantial relationship between migraine and menses were evaluated with 3 consecutive months of daily headache recording diaries. A relationship between menses and migraine was evaluated using International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-II) criteria and a probability model called Probability MM. Women prospectively diagnosed with ICHD-II MM were treated for 3 consecutive months with perimenstrual eletriptan 20 mg 3 times daily starting 2 days prior to the expected onset of menstruation and continued for a total of 6 days. Headache activity was compared during the 3 months of recording prior to eletriptan therapy and 3 months with eletriptan perimenstrual prevention therapy., Results: Three months of pretreatment prospective diaries were completed by 126 women. ICHD-II menstrually related migraine was diagnosed in 74%, with pure MM in 7%. Among those women diagnosed with ICHD-II MM, 61 completed at least 1 treatment month. Overall change in headache activity was a 46% decrease. The mean percentage of treated menses without migraine occurring during the 6 days of treatment was 71%. The percentage of subjects with 1, 2, and 3 migraine-free menstrual periods (no migraines occurring 2 days before menses through the first 3 days of menstruation) with eletriptan, respectively, were 14%, 19%, and 53%. Among those subjects who remained headache-free during the 6 days of eletriptan treatment, migraine occurred during the 3 days immediately after discontinuing eletriptan for 9%. Perimenstrual eletriptan was generally tolerated and no abnormalities were identified on the 6(th) day of treatment using either blood pressure recording or electrocardiogram., Conclusions: Among patients with prospectively identified MM, eletriptan 20 mg 3 times daily effectively reduced MM. A significant reduction in headache activity occurred for 53% of patients.

MK-0493 is a novel, potent, and selective agonist of the melanocortin receptor 4 (MC4R), one of the best-validated genetic targets and considered one of the most promising for the development of antiobesity therapeutics. An ad libitum energy-intake model was qualified with excellent reproducibility: the geometric mean ratio (GMR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for total energy intake over a period of 24 h for 30 mg sibutramine/placebo was 0.82 (0.76, 0.88), and for 10 mg sibutramine/placebo it was 0.98 (0.91, 1.05). MK-0493 showed a small and marginally significant effect on 24-h energy intake, whereas 30 mg of sibutramine caused a significant reduction in total 24-h energy intake; specifically, the GMR (95% CI) for 30 mg sibutramine/placebo was 0.79 (0.74, 0.85). MK-0493 was associated with modest weight reduction from baseline but had only small, statistically insignificant effects relative to placebo after 12 weeks in a fixed-dose study and also after 18 weeks of stepped-titration dosing. We conclude that agonism of MC4R is not likely to represent a viable approach to the development of antiobesity therapeutics.

Subcutaneous sumatriptan is superior to placebo in achieving headache relief. Some commonly reported adverse events are paresthesias, tingling, and transient worsening of headache. Why do patients develop these symptoms? Our unique case may shed light on its actions.

We conducted 3 open-label, multiple-dose, 3-period, randomized, crossover studies in healthy subjects to assess the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between vildagliptin, a novel dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, and representatives of 3 commonly prescribed antihypertensive drug classes: (1) the calcium channel blocker, amlodipine; (2) the angiotensin receptor blocker, valsartan; and (3) the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril. Coadministration of vildagliptin 100 mg with amlodipine 5 mg, valsartan 320 mg, or ramipril 5 mg had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs. The 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratios for area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 24 hours (AUC0-24h) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for vildagliptin, amlodipine, and ramipril (and its active metabolite, ramiprilat) were contained within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (0.80-1.25). Valsartan AUC0-24h and Cmax increased by 24% and 14%, respectively, following coadministration of vildagliptin, but this was not considered clinically significant. Vildagliptin was generally well tolerated when given alone or in combination with amlodipine, valsartan, or ramipril in healthy subjects at steady state. No adjustment in dosage based on pharmacokinetic considerations is required should vildagliptin be coadministered with amlodipine, valsartan, or ramipril in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

Vildagliptin is a potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor in development for the treatment of type 2 diabetes that improves glycemic control by enhancing alpha- and beta-cell responsiveness to glucose. Two open-label, single-dose, randomized, crossover studies in healthy subjects (ages 18-45 years) investigated the dose proportionality of vildagliptin pharmacokinetics (n = 20) and the effect of food (n = 24) on vildagliptin pharmacokinetics. There was a linear relationship (r(2) = 0.999) between vildagliptin doses of 25, 50, 100, and 200 mg and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) and maximum plasma concentration (C(max)). Dose proportionality was assessed using a statistical power model [X = alpha x (dose)(beta)]. The 90% confidence intervals of the proportionality coefficient, beta, for AUC(0-infinity) (1.15-1.19) and C(max) (1.04-1.14) indicated that deviations from dose proportionality were small (<7.7%). Doubling of dose led to 2.1- to 2.3-fold increases in AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) but no dose-dependent changes in time to reach C(max) or terminal elimination half-life. Administration of vildagliptin 100 mg following a high-fat meal decreased C(max) by 19% and AUC(0-infinity) by 10%. Vildagliptin displays approximately dose-proportional pharmacokinetics over the 25- to 200-mg dose range, and administration with food has no clinically relevant effect on vildagliptin pharmacokinetics.

Vildagliptin is a novel antidiabetic agent that is an orally active, potent, and selective inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase IV, the enzyme responsible for degradation of the incretin hormones. This open-label, randomized, 3-period crossover study investigated the potential for pharmacokinetic interactions in 18 healthy subjects during coadministration of vildagliptin and digoxin. Subjects were randomized to receive each of 3 treatments: vildagliptin 100 mg qd, digoxin (0.5 mg, then 0.25 mg qd on days 2-7), and the combination vildagliptin/digoxin for 7 days. Coadministration of digoxin with vildagliptin had no effect on exposure to vildagliptin (geometric mean ratios [90% confidence interval]: AUC(0-24h), 0.99 [0.95-1.03]; C(max), 0.95 [0.85-1.06]) or to digoxin (AUC(0-24h), 1.02 [0.94-1.12]; C(max), 1.08 [0.97-1.20]). In addition, no changes in t(max), t((1/2)), and CL/F were observed for either drug. These results indicate that no dose adjustment is necessary when vildagliptin and digoxin are coadministered.

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibition prevents the rapid degradation of the incretins, glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide. Incretins have beneficial effects on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes through their effects on both alpha- and beta-cells in the pancreas and possibly through additional non-pancreatic effects. Vildagliptin is a potent and selective oral DPP-4 inhibitor that has been studied both as monotherapy and in combination with other antidiabetic treatments. This agent has been shown to be well tolerated and is efficacious in reducing glycosylated haemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose and postprandial glucose levels in trials lasting up to 52 weeks. Vildagliptin is weight neutral, does not cause oedema and is associated with a very low incidence of hypoglycaemia. Recently reported clinical data have helped to further clarify the mechanisms of action and effects of vildagliptin. These results suggest that vildagliptin, as a member of the novel class of DPP-4 inhibitors, has the potential to significantly change the clinical management of diabetes. Future research will further define its use in various patient populations and its possible disease-modifying effects.

Background: Eletriptan (Relpax) is a new triptan soon to be made available by prescription for the treatment of acute migraine. Currently five triptans are available by prescription and more are under development. In light of the many drugs for treating acute migraine, there is a need for evidence-based assessments to help determine the relative efficacy and harm of these treatments., Objectives: To determine the efficacy of eletriptan for treating a single migraine attack using the outcomes of headache response and pain-free response at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 hours, and sustained relief over 24 hours. To express efficacy in terms of number-needed-to-treat (NNT). To determine the adverse effects of a single dose of eletriptan and express this in terms of number-needed-to-harm (NNH). To allow for the comparison of the efficacy of eletriptan with other migraine treatments evaluated systematically in the same way., Search Strategy: Data from all Phase III randomised placebo-controlled trials were made available by the manufacturer, Pfizer Inc. To date, these trials comprise the only data on eletriptan relevant to this review in a published or unpublished form; thus, searches of electronic databases for further trials of eletriptan were not conducted. Date of last search: January 2000., Selection Criteria: Trials of eletriptan for acute migraine; randomised allocation to treatment groups, including a placebo group; double-blind design; International Headache Society diagnostic criteria for migraine with or without aura; single migraine attack; single-dose treatment at standard doses; adult population; baseline pain of moderate or severe intensity using a 4-point standardised rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain); and dichotomous or percentage data for at least one of the main efficacy outcomes., Data Collection and Analysis: Trials were scored for quality and data extracted by two independent reviewers. Dichotomous or percentage data were extracted and pooled to calculate the relative benefit (RB) or relative risk (RR) and NNTs or NNHs for a number of outcomes for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg. The main outcomes considered were headache response at 1 and 2 hours, pain-free response at 2 hours, sustained relief over 24 hours and adverse effects. Minor outcomes considered were headache response at 0.5 and 4 hours, and pain-free response at 0.5, 1 and 4 hours., Main Results: Six trials met the inclusion criteria. Significant benefit of eletriptan over placebo was shown for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg for the primary efficacy outcomes of headache response and pain-free response at 2 hours. For headache response at 2 hours, the NNTs (with 95% confidence intervals) were 4.4 (3.4 to 6.2), 2.9 (2.6 to 3.3) and 2.6 (2.4 to 3.0) for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg, respectively. For pain-free response at 2 hours, the NNTs were 9.9 (6.9 to 18), 4.0 (3.6 to 4.5) and 3.7 (3.4 to 4.2), for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 and 80 mg, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of major adverse effects between any dose of eletriptan and placebo. The incidence of minor adverse effects was significantly higher for all eletriptan doses than for placebo, with NNHs of 11 (95% confidence interval, 6.2 to 39), 7.0 (5.2 to 11) and 3.7 (3.1 to 4.5) for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg, respectively., Authors' Conclusions: Eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg are effective for the treatment of an acute migraine attack. Effectiveness is dose-related, with statistically significant differences between doses for pain-free response and 24-hour outcomes. Eletriptan compares well with other triptans available for outcomes measured up to 2 hours and provides meaningful relief for 24 hours. Taken as a single dose, eletriptan was well tolerated and caused no major harm. The incidence of minor harm was dose-dependent, with 80 mg giving significantly more adverse effects than 40 mg.

Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg in triptan-naïve patients (who have not previously used triptans) versus triptan-experienced patients (who have previously used triptans)., Methods: Efficacy and tolerability data for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg were pooled from 10 similarly designed, randomized, parallel-group studies, and triptan-naïve and triptan-experienced patients were compared with placebo across the 3 triptan doses. The primary efficacy endpoint was headache response at 2 hours postdose. Secondary efficacy endpoints were 2-hour pain-free response, 2-hour absence of associated symptoms, 2-hour functional response, 24-hour sustained headache response, and 24-hour sustained pain-free response., Results: For eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg versus placebo, respectively, triptan-naïve patients showed significantly higher 2-hour headache response (54%, 61%, 66% vs. 31%; P < .0001), 2-hour pain-free response (20%, 28%, and 31% vs. 8%; P < .0001), and 24-hour sustained headache response (34%, 45%, and 51% vs. 20%; P < .0001). A similarly significant efficacy advantage was also observed in the triptan-experienced subgroup for 2-hour headache response (46%, 63%, 69% vs. 21%; P < .0001), 2-hour pain-free response (13%, 32%, and 38% vs. 4%; P < .0001), and 24-hour sustained headache response (29%, 41%, and 45% vs. 9%; P < .0001). Previous treatment status did not influence tolerability, and all 3 doses of eletriptan were well tolerated., Conclusions: These data suggest that eletriptan has comparable efficacy versus placebo among both triptan-naïve and triptan-experienced patients.

Background: Metastatic prostate cancer is characterized by the presence of osteoblastic bone metastases. Bone metastases account for most of the morbidity from this disease. Inhibition of osteoclast activity with the potent bisphosphonate zoledronic acid reduces skeletal complications and decreases serum levels of biochemical bone turnover markers compared with placebo. Atrasentan is an investigational agent that inhibits endothelin-1 receptor, resulting in decreased osteoblast activity., Methods: The effects of atrasentan alone versus combination therapy with atrasentan and zoledronic acid were investigated on bone turnover markers in men with bone metastases from prostate cancer. Forty-four men were randomized to receive either atrasentan alone or combination therapy, and 33 completed at least 12 weeks of treatment and were included in the primary analysis., Results: Treatment with the combination resulted in significantly lower serum levels of N-telopeptide, a marker of bone resorption, compared with treatment with atrasentan alone. There was no difference between groups in serum levels of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, a marker of bone formation, at 12 weeks. Commonly observed adverse effects were edema, rhinitis, fatigue, and shortness of breath, most of which were NCI CTC (version 3.0) Grade 1. No Grade 4 or 5 treatment-related toxicities were observed. There was minimal clinical efficacy, with no objective responses and only 1 prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response., Conclusions: There is no evidence for additive or synergistic effects of combination therapy with atrasentan and zoledronic acid on bone turnover markers in men with metastatic prostate cancer., (Copyright 2006 American Cancer Society.)

Levormeloxifene is a selective estrogen receptor modulator that was developed as an alternative to estrogen replacement therapy for the treatment and prevention of postmenopausal bone loss. In animal models, levormeloxifene prevented increased bone turnover and vertebral bone loss following ovariectomy. Studies of healthy postmenopausal women showed that levormeloxifene 1.25-20 mg/day decreased bone turnover and increased bone mineral density to a comparable extent to that observed during conventional hormone replacement therapy. However, in the phase II and III studies, the effect on bone turnover and bone mineral density was similar for each dose of levormeloxifene and the minimal effective dose was never established. The development of levormeloxifene was discontinued during the phase III trial due to a significant incidence of gynecologic adverse events in the levormeloxifene-treated groups. This article reviews the preclinical and clinical studies of levormeloxifene and the circumstances for the premature termination of the development of the drug. Other selective estrogen receptor modulators such as tamoxifen and raloxifene and the perspectives for selective estrogen receptor modulators in development are furthermore discussed.

Lasofoxifene is in late-stage development for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Digoxin is commonly prescribed for arrhythmias and congestive heart failure, has a narrow therapeutic index, and may be coadministered with lasofoxifene. This study was conducted to determine the effect of lasofoxifene (4-mg loading dose on day 11 followed by 0.5 mg/d on days 12-20) on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin (0.25 mg/d on days 1-20) in 12 healthy postmenopausal women. On days 10 and 20, blood and urine samples were collected for 24 hours to determine digoxin concentrations. The 90% confidence interval (CI) of least squares mean ratio for maximum concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) was calculated. Lasofoxifene had no effect on digoxin plasma pharmacokinetics with a ratio (90% CI) of 95.4% (84.6%-107%) and 103% (97.7%-108%) for C(max) and AUC(0-24), respectively. The ratio of the percentage of dose eliminated unchanged in urine in 24 hours was 127% (116% to 142%). Coadministration of lasofoxifene had no effect on the steady state pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

Prolongation of QT interval on an electrocardiogram is a valuable predictor of a drug's ability to cause potentially fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmia (torsades de pointes). Darifenacin is a muscarinic M3 selective receptor antagonist developed for the treatment of overactive bladder, a debilitating condition that is particularly prevalent in the older population. This 7-day, randomized, parallel-group study (n=188) measured QT/QTc interval in healthy volunteers receiving once-daily darifenacin at steady-state therapeutic (15 mg) and supratherapeutic (75 mg) doses, alongside controls receiving placebo or moxifloxacin (positive control, 400 mg) once daily. There was no significant increase in QTcF interval with darifenacin treatment compared with placebo. Mean changes from baseline at pharmacokinetic Tmax versus placebo were -0.4 and -2.2 milliseconds in the darifenacin 15 mg and 75 mg groups, respectively, compared with +11.6 milliseconds in the moxifloxacin group (P<.01). This study demonstrates that darifenacin does not prolong QT/QTc interval.

Meta-analysis provides valuable information regarding relative efficacies of triptans, but head-to-head comparator studies remain the gold standard. Three similar head-to-head trials comparing eletriptan 40 mg (E40) with sumatriptan 100 mg (S100) provide a rare opportunity and sufficient power, for robust comparisons of efficacy. Data were combined from three double-blind, placebo-controlled, first-dose, first-attack acute migraine treatment studies comparing E40 (n=1132), S100 (n=1129), and placebo (n=645). The primary outcome was headache response at 2 h. Secondary outcomes included headache response at 1 h, pain-free and functional responses, and sustained headache and pain-free responses. Odds ratios were calculated for summary estimates of probability of response. There were higher headache response rates with eletriptan versus sumatriptan at 2 h (67% vs. 57%; P<0.0001) and 1 h (34% vs. 26%; P<0.0001). Eletriptan also had higher 2 h pain-free (35% vs. 25%; P<0.0001) and functional responses (67% vs. 58%; P<0.0001). Sustained headache (42%) and pain-free (22%) response rates were higher for eletriptan versus sumatriptan (34%, P<0.0001; 15%, P<0.0001). The probability of response for eletriptan versus sumatriptan ranged from 36% higher (relief of nausea) to 64% higher (sustained pain-free rate). Combined analysis demonstrates that E40 has superior efficacy versus S100 across all clinically relevant outcomes.

Objective: To provide a comprehensive review of the tolerability and safety of eletriptan. Background.-Eletriptan is a potent and selective 5-HT1B/1D agonist that has demonstrated significant efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine in doses of 20 mg, 40 mg, and 80 mg., Design: This review reports the tolerability and safety of eletriptan across a broad spectrum of preclinical studies and clinical trials that collectively included treatment of more than 11 000 subjects and more than 74 000 migraine attacks., Results: In clinical trials, eletriptan was well tolerated and safe across its dosing range of 20 mg to 80 mg. The adverse event profile of eletriptan 20 mg was similar to placebo, while the most commonly used dose, eletriptan 40 mg, has an adverse event profile that is only marginally higher than placebo. Eletriptan was safe and well tolerated regardless of age or gender, and for both short- and long-term treatment. Eletriptan is metabolized primarily by the CYP3A4 enzyme. Coadministration of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors was not associated with clinically meaningful change in eletriptan tolerability or safety in the population included in these clinical trials. The margin of cardiovascular safety for eletriptan was also confirmed by a well-controlled clinical study in which intravenous eletriptan in excess of an 80-mg dose was rapidly infused in patients undergoing coronary angiography; nonetheless, it is recommended that eletriptan not be coadministered with a limited list of 7 potent CYP3A4 inhibitors; in addition, the triptan class in general (including eletriptan) is contraindicated in patients with symptoms or findings consistent with ischemic heart disease or other significant underlying cardiovascular disease., Conclusions: This comprehensive review found that eletriptan is safe and well tolerated, and that relatively large changes in dose and plasma concentration result in minimal changes in tolerability.

Four separate studies were conducted to examine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of eletriptan, a 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist being developed for the treatment of migraines, after oral and intravenous administration. Fifty-five males received oral (1.5-30 mg or 30-120 mg) or intravenous (1.67-50 microg/kg or 50-102 microg/kg) eletriptan in four double- and single-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending-dose crossover studies. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration curve (AUC) appeared linear over all dose ranges, with an apparent terminal half-life of 4 to 5 hours. Clearance and volume of distribution remained constant with dose. The time to first occurrence of Cmax (tmax) for oral eletriptan was approximately 1 hour and was unaffected by dose. Comparison of AUC values suggested an absolute bioavailability of approximately 50%. A linear PK/PD model, fitted to the data, predicted small, transient elevations in diastolic blood pressure following eletriptan doses > or = 60 mg. These effects were considered unlikely to be clinically significant. Eletriptan was well tolerated, and treatment-related adverse events were mild to moderate and transient. These PK properties should result in eletriptan having a rapid onset and sustained duration of action in terms of migraine efficacy.

The pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of the 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist eletriptan were characterized in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose escalation study. Healthy males received single oral doses of 10 to 120 mg. Following screening and baseline measurements, plasma and saliva eletriptan concentrations were measured at intervals over 48 hours and 24 hours, respectively. Samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Both the maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma eletriptan concentration-time curve showed an essentially linear relationship to the administered dose. Eletriptan exhibited a median time to maximum plasma concentration of 1 to 1.25 hours and a mean elimination half-life of 3.6 to 7.0 hours. Mean salivary-plasma ratios for pharmacokinetic parameters generally remained constant across the 30 to 90 mg dose range. Eletriptan was well tolerated, with mostly mild and transient adverse events. In conclusion, oral doses of eletriptan in the therapeutic range were rapidly absorbed and exhibited essentially linear plasma and saliva pharmacokinetics.

The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics and safety of eletriptan in different phases of the menstrual cycle. Female volunteers (n = 16) with a regular menstrual cycle (28 +/- 4 days) received a single oral dose of 80 mg eletriptan during each of the four cycle phases: phase 1 (menses), days 1 to 4; phase 2 (follicular), days 6 to 10; phase 3 (ovulatory), days 11 to 13; and phase 4 (luteal), days 21 to 24. Eletriptan plasma concentrations were determined from serial plasma samples taken during a 24-hourperiod after dosing. Blood pressure, pulse rate, and ECG measurements were performed at baseline, 1 and 24 hours after dosing. No significant differences between phases were observed for maximum plasma concentration (cmax, range of means = 188-234 ng/ml), time to maximum concentration (tmax, range of means = 1.8-2.5 h), or systemic exposure (area under the curve [AUC], range of means = 1194-1514 ng x h/ml). Although there was a statistically significant difference in the terminal phase elimination rate constant (kel) between phases 1 and2 (0.175/h vs. 0.158/h, p = 0.044), the corresponding difference in terminal phase half-life (t 1/2) (4.0 h vs. 4.4 h) was not considered to be clinicallyrelevant. No clinically relevant differences in blood pressure, pulse rate, or ECG were observed, and the incidence, nature, and severity of adverse events were similar in all phases. The different phases of the menstrual cycle had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics, safety, or tolerability of oral 80 mg eletriptan in healthy females.

Background: Eletriptan (Relpax) is a new triptan soon to be made available by prescription for the treatment of acute migraine. Currently five triptans are available by prescription and more are under development. In light of the many drugs for treating acute migraine, there is a need for evidence-based assessments to help determine the relative efficacy and harm of these treatments., Objectives: To determine the efficacy of eletriptan for treating a single migraine attack using the outcomes of headache response and pain-free response at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 hours, and sustained relief over 24 hours. To express efficacy in terms of number-needed-to-treat (NNT). To determine the adverse effects of a single dose of eletriptan and express this in terms of number-needed-to-harm (NNH). To allow for the comparison of the efficacy of eletriptan with other migraine treatments evaluated systematically in the same way., Search Strategy: Data from all Phase III randomised placebo-controlled trials were made available by the manufacturer, Pfizer Inc. To date, these trials comprise the only data on eletriptan relevant to this review in a published or unpublished form; thus, searches of electronic databases for further trials of eletriptan were not conducted., Selection Criteria: Trials of eletriptan for acute migraine; randomised allocation to treatment groups, including a placebo group; double-blind design; International Headache Society diagnostic criteria for migraine with or without aura; single migraine attack; single-dose treatment at standard doses; adult population; baseline pain of moderate or severe intensity using a 4-point standardised rating scale (0 = no pain, 1 = mild pain, 2 = moderate pain and 3 = severe pain); and dichotomous or percentage data for at least one of the main efficacy outcomes., Data Collection and Analysis: Trials were scored for quality and data extracted by two independent reviewers. Dichotomous or percentage data were extracted and pooled to calculate the relative benefit (RB) or relative risk (RR) and NNTs or NNHs for a number of outcomes for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg. The main outcomes considered were headache response at 1 and 2 hours, pain-free response at 2 hours, sustained relief over 24 hours and adverse effects. Minor outcomes considered were headache response at 0.5 and 4 hours, and pain-free response at 0.5, 1 and 4 hours., Main Results: Six trials met the inclusion criteria. Significant benefit of eletriptan over placebo was shown for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg for the primary efficacy outcomes of headache response and pain-free response at 2 hours. For headache response at 2 hours, the NNTs (with 95% confidence intervals) were 4.4 (3.4 to 6.2), 2.9 (2.6 to 3.3) and 2.6 (2.4 to 3.0) for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg, respectively. For pain-free response at 2 hours, the NNTs were 9.9 (6.9 to 18), 4.5 (4.0 to 5.1) and 3.7 (3.4 to 4.2), for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 and 80 mg, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of major adverse effects between any dose of eletriptan and placebo. The incidence of minor adverse effects was significantly higher for all eletriptan doses than for placebo, with NNHs of 11 (95% confidence interval, 6.2 to 39), 7.0 (5.2 to 11) and 3.7 (3.1 to 4.5) for eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg, respectively., Reviewer's Conclusions: Eletriptan 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg are effective for the treatment of an acute migraine attack. Effectiveness is dose-related, with statistically significant differences between doses for pain-free response and 24-hour outcomes. Eletriptan compares well with other triptans available for outcomes measured up to 2 hours and provides meaningful relief for 24 hours. Taken as a single dose, eletriptan was well tolerated and caused no major harm. The incidence of minor harm was dose-dependent, with 80 mg giving significantly more adverse effects than 40 mg.

This study investigates the pharmacokinetics and safety profile of Z-321, (4R)-3-(indan-2-ylacetyl)-4-(1-pyrrolidinyl-carbonyl)-1,3-thiazoli dine, a novel specific orally active prolyl endopeptidase (PEP) inhibitor. Following a preliminary safety evaluation wherein 2 subjects received 3.75 and 15 mg doses and 2 other subjects received 7.5 and 30 mg doses, 16 subjects were assigned to two groups of 8 subjects each. In each group, 6 subjects were to receive active treatment, and 1 or 2 subjects were to receive placebo treatment. One group received 60 mg under fasted and fed conditions. A separate group of 8 subjects received 60 mg of Z-321 or a placebo in a bid regimen for 6 days and the morning dose on day 7. The concentrations of Z-321 and its main metabolites--R- and S-sulfoxide; RR-, SS-, and RS-indanol; and indanolsulfoxides in plasma and urine--were determined by the HPLC method. In the multiple-dose study, the cholinesterase activity was gradually increased and reached above the normal range on day 8 in 3 of 6 subjects given Z-321 and gradually returned to the normal range after completion of dosing. The elevation of plasma cholinesterase activity was considered to be an action of Z-321, but this remains to be verified. In a single-dose study at a dose of 30 mg, headache and vomiting were observed in 1 of 6 subjects. In the multiple-dose study, slight skin itching and eczema in 3 and 2 of 6 subjects, respectively, and headache in 2 of 6 subjects were observed, but all symptoms were not severe. There were no other abnormal findings in objective signs and laboratory findings, including blood pressure, heart rate, electrocardiogram, body temperature, hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis. The Cmax of Z-321 at 30, 60, and 120 mg in the fasting state were 63.7 +/- 23.9, 102.0 +/- 43.1, and 543.3 +/- 437.0 ng/ml (mean +/- SD), respectively, at 0.9 hours after administration, and the t1/2 was about 1.8 hours. There were no dramatic changes in the pharmacokinetics of Z-321 in the presence of food. In the multiple-dose study, there was no drug accumulation trend in plasma. These results indicate that Z-321 has acceptable pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetics profiles for clinical use without any serious adverse events, as verified in healthy young male volunteers.

The diuretic effects, pharmacokinetics, and safety of CI-977, a new centrally acting selective kappa-opioid agonist, were determined in 16 healthy subjects. Subjects received single intramuscular doses of CI-977 (5, 15, or 25 micrograms) or placebo 1 week apart according to a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, four-period, crossover design. Serial blood and urine specimens were collected after each dose. Significant dose-related decreases in negative free water clearance and urine osmolality and increases in urine volume were observed after administration of 15- and 25-micrograms doses of CI-977. CI-977 had no effect on urine electrolyte excretion or serum antidiuretic hormone. Absorption of CI-977 was rapid with individual tmax values ranging from 0.17 to 1.5 hours. Cmax and AUC(0-infinity) increased proportionally with dose. Individual elimination half-life values ranged from 0.6 to 3.3 hours and were independent of dose. Changes in free water clearance were related to CI-977 Cmax (r2 = 0.29, P = 0.0001) and AUC(0-4 hr) (r2 = 0.32, P = 0.0001) values. The most frequently reported adverse events after CI-977 administration were dizziness, fatigue, paresthesia, headache, vasodilatation (facial flushing), emotional lability, high feeling, and abnormal thinking. The frequency and intensity of adverse events increased with increasing CI-977 dose. In conclusion, CI-977 Cmax and AUC(0-infinity) increased in proportion to dose over the range of 5 to 25 micrograms; decreases in negative free water clearance were related to CI-977 dose and Cmax and AUC(0-4 hr) values; and the frequency and intensity of adverse events increased with increasing CI-977 dose.

Alizapride is a new substituted benzamide with suggested superior antiemetic efficacy to and fewer side effects than metoclopramide. High-dose alizapride (4 mg/kg X five doses) was compared with high-dose metoclopramide (2 mg/kg X five doses) in a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial in 62 evaluable patients undergoing strongly emetic cancer chemotherapy. Patients receiving metoclopramide experienced significantly fewer vomiting episodes than patients receiving alizapride (median of three episodes vs. eight episodes; P less than 0.001). Metoclopramide was more effective in decreasing the volume of emesis than was alizapride (median of 100 ml vs. 360 ml; P less than 0.02). Seventy-two percent of the patients receiving alizapride and 57% of those receiving metoclopramide experienced side effects. High-dose metoclopramide is an effective antiemetic in patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. Alizapride is less effective and has more side effects than metoclopramide. We do not recommend the further use of alizapride.

Tamoxifen and trioxifene are antiestrogens that appear to have different endocrine effects when tested in rats. Whereas tamoxifen has considerable clinical activity, trioxifene is a new antiestrogen with undefined clinical activity. Thirty-six patients were treated with graded doses of trioxifene. The low-dose group (0.5 to 12 mg/m2 twice daily) had a 21% response rate in 24 subjects, and the high-dose group (40 to 100 mg/m2 twice daily) had a 33% response rate in 12 patients (P = 0.13). The time to treatment failure was 67 days and 178 days for the low- and high-dose groups, respectively. Toxicities were non-dose dependent; those of moderate frequency included leukopenia (41%) and nausea (31%). Tamoxifen reduced both prolactin and inducible growth hormone (GH). Trioxifene, although reducing prolactin, differed from tamoxifen in that an increase in inducible GH occurred. Furthermore, a striking dose-dependent decrease in luteinizing hormone and lesser decrease in follicle-stimulating hormone occurred only in the trioxifene-treated patients. This implies an intrinsic estrogenic action of trioxifene in man. Trioxifene is no more efficacious than tamoxifen and has more toxicity.