Search

Objective The objective of this study was to assess the strategic changes implemented in the departmental mission to continue safe delivery of otolaryngology care and to support the broader institutional mission during the COVID-19 pandemic response. Study Design Retrospective assessment was performed to the response and management strategy developed to transform the clinical and academic enterprise. Setting Large urban tertiary care referral center. Results The departmental structure was reorganized along new clinical teams to effectively meet the system directives for provision of otolaryngology care and support for inpatient cases of COVID-19. A surge deployment schedule was developed to assist frontline colleagues with clinical support as needed. Outpatient otolaryngology was consolidated across the system with conversion of the majority of visits to telehealth. Operative procedures were prioritized to ensure throughput for emergent and time-critical urgent procedures. A tracheostomy protocol was developed to guide management of emergent and elective airways. Educational and research efforts were redirected to focus on otolaryngology care in the clinical context of the COVID-19 crisis. Conclusion Emergence of the COVID-19 global health crisis has challenged delivery of otolaryngology care in an unparalleled manner. The concerns for preserving health of the workforce while ethically addressing patient career needs in a timely manner has created significant dilemmas. A proactive, thoughtful approach that reorganizes the overall departmental effort through provider and staff engagement can facilitate the ability to meet the needs of otolaryngology patients and to support the greater institutional mission to combat the pandemic.

Objective: To evaluate the long-term hearing outcomes of neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients with cochlear implants. Methods: Retrospective analysis of cochlear implant performance in NF2 patients using open- and closed-set speech perception testing. Results: Patients with NF2-associated bilateral vestibular schwannomas frequently become profoundly deaf. The aim of surgical resection should be to preserve serviceable hearing in at least one ear; however, this goal can be difficult to achieve. Frequently, tumor size or poor preoperative hearing status can require a surgical approach that leaves the patient with a profound, bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. If the cochlear nerve is preserved anatomically after vestibular schwannoma surgery, and if promontory stimulation confirms the functionality of the cochlear nerve, then cochlear implantation is an excellent option to restore hearing. We present six cochlear implant patients with NF2 who attained a significant improvement in open- and closed-set speech understanding with a mean follow-up of 7.9 (range: 5–13) years after surgery. In all but one case, the hearing results did not deteriorate over the follow-up period. Conclusion: Early surgical intervention for vestibular schwannomas in NF2 patients when the cochlear nerve can be spared is an important consideration to allow for possible cochlear implantation. A 6- to 8-week recovery period for the anatomically intact cochlear nerve may be necessary to obtain a positive promontory stimulation response following tumor resection and should be performed prior to cochlear implantation.