Search

Background Prevention of hospitalisation is an important aspect of type 2 diabetes (T2D) management. Aims We retrospectively determined the utility of the Hospital Admission Risk Programme (HARP) diabetes risk calculator (HARP tool) in identifying patients with T2D more likely to have unplanned hospital presentations. Methods The HARP tool includes a clinical assessment score (Part A) and a psychosocial and self-management impact score (Part B), and categorises patients into low, medium, high or urgent risk of acute hospitalisation. It was completed for T2D patients attending Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, in 2013. Results Within the cohort of 278 patients (age 65.3 ± 10.5 years; 62.9% male; diabetes duration 10.7 ± 6.6 years), 67.3% were classified as low risk, 32.7% as medium risk and none as high or urgent risk. Following adjustment for confounders, a medium HARP score was associated with a 3.1-fold increased risk of unplanned hospital presentations in the subsequent 12 months (95% confidence interval: 1.35-7.31; P = 0.008). Part A scores were significantly higher for patients that presented to hospital compared to those that did not (14.2 ± 6.8 vs 11.4 ± 5.5; P = 0.034), whereas there was no difference in Part B scores (P = 0.860). Conclusions In patients with low and medium HARP scores, clinical features were more predictive of hospital presentations than certain psychosocial or self-management factors in the present cohort. Further studies are required to characterise unplanned hospitalisation in patients with higher HARP scores, or whether additional psychosocial assessments could improve the tool's predictability.

BACKGROUND: In people with type 1 diabetes (T1D), nocturnal hypoglycaemia (NH) can be slept through and can cause seizures, arrhythmias and death. Hypoglycaemia avoidance can induce hyperglycaemia and ketosis. Patient behaviour impacts clinical outcomes and may be changed by education. AIM: To develop and utilise a survey to evaluate patient self-management of overnight glycaemia in adults with T1D. METHODS: Adults with T1D attending two Australian tertiary referral diabetes clinics completed a survey about their diabetes self-management and glycaemic control, including responses to hypothetical pre-bed blood glucose (BG) levels (4-20 mmol/L). Statistical analyses included t-tests, Chi square tests and ANOVA with significance considered at P < 0.05. RESULTS: There were 205 participants (103 females), with a mean (SD) age of 41 (17) years, T1D duration of 20 (16) years, HbA1c of 7.8(1.4)%, (61.3(8.2) mmol/mol), 38% on insulin pump therapy (CSII) and 36% with impaired hypoglycaemia awareness (IHA). Mean (SD) number of BG tests/day was 5.4 (2.7). Patients set higher BG target levels at bedtime and overnight: 7.5(1.4) and 7.1(1.3) mmol/L, respectively, compared to daytime (6.9(1.0); P < 0.0001 and P = 0.002 respectively). Only 36% of participants reported treating nocturnal hypoglycaemia (NH) with the recommended refined, then complex, carbohydrate. Only 28% of patients made safe choices in all bedtime BG scenarios, with higher rates for CSII users, P = 0.0005. Further education was desired by 32% of respondents, with higher rates in those with (44%) versus without IHA (25%), P = 0.006. CONCLUSIONS: Many adults with T1D have suboptimal knowledge and behaviour regarding overnight BG self-management. A survey, piloted herein, may facilitate the identification of patients who could benefit from further education.

Context Diagnosis of paragangliomas (PGL) and phaeochromocytomas (PC) can be challenging particularly if the tumour is small. Detection of metastatic disease is important for comprehensive management of malignant PC/PGL. Somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) agents have high sensitivity for these tumours, particularly the DOTA family of radiopharmaceuticals labelled with 68 Gallium. Objective To describe the utility of SRI in primary assessment (ie before surgery) for PC/PGL and whether measures of maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) could be used to distinguish between adrenal adenomas and PCs. Design Retrospective analysis of patients with PC and PGL between 2012 and 2017. Patients Somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) was performed for suspected PC (n = 46) or PGL (n = 27) of which 36 were during primary assessment and 37 during secondary assessment (follow-up after surgery). For comparison of adrenal SUVmax, scans from 30 patients without suspected PC/PGL (20 with normal adrenals; 10 with incidental adenomas) were evaluated. Measurements Baseline description, sensitivity, specificity, Youden's index. Results Sensitivity of DOTATATE-PET was 88% for PC and 100% for PGL. False-negative scans were seen in 2/10 PCs 28 mm which had features of cystic degeneration. SUVmax of PCs and PGLs was more than double compared to adrenal adenomas (P > .001). Conclusion Somatostatin receptor imaging (SRI) has high sensitivity in primary assessment for PC and PGL. We recommend that SRI should be performed as part of primary assessment in all suspected PGLs (due to higher risk of multifocal lesions) and in PCs suspected to be associated with hereditary syndromes or metastases.

SummaryObjective Serum thyroglobulin (Tg) is a marker of residual differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) after total thyroidectomy; however, circulating antithyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb) may interfere with the immunoassay for Tg. Ultrasensitive assays may have a more significant role in detecting circulating Tg in the context of samples containing TgAb. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of ultrasensitive thyroglobulin (US-Tg) measurement compared to standard Tg measurement and to assess the influence of serum TgAb positivity on Tg detection in a large tertiary referral centre cohort in Australia. Design All patients with DTC who had undergone total thyroidectomy were included in this retrospective, observational cohort study. Patients Patients providing samples for the period of June 2006 until January 2014 were analysed. Three thousand two hundred and eight samples were measured at the same points in time, enabling serum Tg assays to be compared for the same TSH status (stimulated or suppressed). Measurements The standard assay, the Siemens Immulite 2000 Tg assay, was compared to the serum ultrasensitive ELISA RSR™ Tg. TgAb were simultaneously measured using Abbott Architect or Immulite 2000. Results There were 3019 samples included in the final analysis for comparison of the standard and ultrasensitive assays along with TgAb status. The majority of samples were TgAb negative (87%), with 48% of TgAb-negative samples associated with an undetectable serum Tg, suggestive of disease-free status at the time of sampling. Of note, 26% (n = 104) of the TgAb-positive samples were positive for Tg on the ultrasensitive Tg assay, but negative on the immulite Tg assay, and 62·5% (n = 65) of these samples corresponded to DTC recurrence. Conclusion The US-Tg assay has greater clinical utility than the standard immulite Tg assay specifically in the scenario of antibody positivity, with a significant number of samples corresponding to clinically relevant recurrent or metastatic disease.