Search

Purpose To describe a series of children with extensive PNF or treatment refractory PLGG treated on a compassionate basis with trametinib. Methods We report on six patients with NF‐1 treated with trametinib on a compassionate basis at British Columbia Children's Hospital since 2017. Data were collected retrospectively from the patient record. RAPNO and volumetric criteria were used to evaluate the response of intracranial and extracranial lesions, respectively. Results Subjects were 21 months to 14 years old at the time of initiation of trametinib therapy and 3/6 subjects are male. Duration of therapy was 4–28 months at the time of this report. All patients had partial response or were stable on analysis. Two patients with life‐threatening PNF had a partial radiographic response in tandem with significant clinical improvement and developmental catch up. One subject discontinued therapy after 6 months due to paronychia and inadequate response. The most common adverse effect (AE) was grade 1–2 paronychia or dermatitis in 5/6 patients. There were no grade 3 or 4 AEs. At the time of this report, five patients remain on therapy. Conclusion Trametinib is an effective therapy for advanced PNF and refractory PLGG in patients with NF‐1 and is well tolerated in children. Further data and clinical trials are required to assess tolerance, efficacy and durability of response, and length of treatment required in such patients., Here, we report on response to Trametinib, a MEK inhibitor in children with NF‐1. Our experience presented in this report demonstrates that Trametinib is an effective therapy for advanced, life‐threatening PNF, and treatment‐refractory PLGG in patients with NF‐1 and is well tolerated in children.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) germinomas are treatment-sensitive tumors with excellent survival outcomes. Current treatment strategies combine chemotherapy with radiotherapy (RT) in order to reduce the field and dose of RT. Germinomas originating in the basal ganglia/thalamus (BGTGs) have proven challenging to treat given their rarity and poorly defined imaging characteristics. Craniospinal (CSI), whole brain (WBI), whole ventricle (WVI), and focal RT have all been utilized; however, the best treatment strategy remains unclear. METHODS: Retrospective multi-institutional analysis has been conducted across 18 institutions in four countries. RESULTS: For 43 cases of non-metastatic BGTGs, the 5- and 10-year event-free survival (EFS) were 85.8% and 81.0%, respectively, while the 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) were 100%, and 95.5%, respectively (one patient fatality from unrelated cause). Median RT doses were as follows: CSI: 2250 cGy/cGy(RBE) (1980 to 2400 cGy/cGy[RBE]), WBI: 2340 (1800 to 3000 cGy/cGy[RBE]), WVI: 2340 cGy/cGy(RBE) (1800 to 2550 cGy/cGy[RBE]), focal: 3600 cGy (3060 to 5400 cGy). Thirty-eight patients (90.5%) received chemotherapy. There was no statistically significant difference in the EFS based on initial field extent (p=0.84). Nevertheless, no relapses were reported in patients who received CSI or WBI. Chemotherapy alone had significantly inferior EFS compared to combined therapy (p=0.0092), but patients were salvageable with RT. CONCLUSION: Patients with BGTGs have excellent outcomes and RT proved to be an integral component of the treatment plan. This group of patients should be included in future prospective clinical trials and the best RT field should be investigated further.