Search

AIMS Recent increases in the number of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) prescribed oral anticoagulants (OAC) are evident in Ireland and internationally, largely due to the availability of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This study aimed to determine the rate of stroke in the context of increasing anticoagulation utilisation, with a focus on AF-related ischaemic stroke (IS). METHODS Dispensing data for OACs were identified for the period 2010-2018 as well as hospital discharges for IS (2005-2018). Irish National Stroke Register data were used to elucidate the characteristics of patients with acute ischaemic stroke. RESULTS The number of patients prescribed OACs increased by 94% from 2010-2018 with a significant change from 2013 (β = 2.57, P = .038), associated with a large increase in the number of patients on DOACs. There was 3.3-fold increase in expenditure on OACs nationally from 2013 to 2018, of which 94% was DOAC related. Using the 2013 timepoint, ischaemic stroke rates until 2018 did not show a significant deviation from the previous trend (β = 0.00, P = .898). The percentage of AF-related ischaemic stroke was stable from 2013 to 2017 with a 4.5% decrease in 2018. The percentage of ischaemic stroke patients with previously diagnosed AF decreased from 2013 to 2018; however, there was an increase in the percentage of ischaemic strokes while on OAC in this cohort. CONCLUSION Large increases in OAC utilisation have not resulted in changes in ischaemic stroke rates at a national level. The percentage of ischaemic strokes with a previous diagnosis of AF has decreased indicating a possible benefit from greater OAC utilisation. However, the percentage presenting with an ischaemic stroke while on OAC treatment is increasing. The increase in patients presenting with stroke while treated with OAC may largely reflect the national increase in patients prescribed DOACs but the findings raise concerns about treatment failures. The real-world effectiveness of DOACs requires further examination.

To determine whether prophylactic, low dose controlled-release aspirin improves outcome for pregnant women and their babies in Barbados.Randomised placebo-controlled trial.The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Barbados.All women attending antenatal clinics between 12 and 32 weeks of gestation were eligible, if without specific contraindications to aspirin and unlikely to deliver immediately.Randomisation was computer-generated in the antenatal clinic; 1822 women were allocated to receive 75 mg controlled-release aspirin and 1825 matching placebo.Proteinuric pre-eclampsia, other pregnancy-induced hypertension, pregnancy duration, birthweight, stillbirths and neonatal deaths, major neonatal events.All but three women from each group were followed up successfully. Forty-four percent were primigravid, and 8% had previous obstetric complications. There were no significant differences between the allocated treatment groups in the incidence of proteinuric pre-eclampsia (40 [2.2%] of those allocated aspirin, compared with 46 [2.5%] allocated placebo), of preterm delivery (255 [14.0%] vs 270 [14.8%]), of birthweight1500 g (32 [1.7%] vs 33 [1.8%]) or of stillbirth and neonatal death (44 [2.4%] vs 38 [2.1%]). Aspirin was not associated with excess risk of maternal or fetal bleeding.The results of this study in Barbados do not support the routine use of low dose aspirin for prevention of pre-eclampsia or its complications, confirming results of previous large trials in other settings.The effect of administration of a prophylactic dose of controlled-release aspirin on the prevention of pre-eclampsia was investigated in a randomized placebo-controlled trial conducted at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Barbados in 1992-94. All women attending hospital antenatal clinics between 12 and 32 weeks of gestation were eligible for the study; enrolled were 1822 cases allocated to receive 75 mg of aspirin per day and 1825 matched controls who received a placebo. Study participants represented about 60% of women who gave birth during the enrollment period. Aspirin administration was not associated with any excessive risk of infant or maternal bleeding. However, there were no significant differences between cases and controls in terms of the incidence of proteinuric pre-eclampsia (2.2% vs. 2.5%), preterm delivery (14.0% vs. 14.8%), birth weight under 1500 g (1.7% vs. 1.8%), or stillbirth and neonatal death (2.4% vs. 2.1%). These results were not affected by the time of pregnancy at which aspirin prophylaxis was initiated or parity. The Barbados findings are consistent with previous studies and fail to support the routine use of low-dose aspirin for the prevention of pre-eclampsia and its complications.