Search

Type 2 diabetes has now reached epidemic proportions across the world and is the cause of substantial morbidity and mortality. Patients with diabetes suffer from their mircovascular complications of retinopathy (blindness), nephropathy (renal failure, dialysis), and neuropathy (neropathic pain, trophic ulcers). However, ultimately, the majority of diabetics will die from macrovascular cardiovascular disease. Not only does cardiovascular disease develop earlier in the presence of diabetes, mortality from cardiovascular disease is increased by a factor of two to three in persons with diabetes as compared with the general population. To reduce this increased risk, a multifactorial approach to the management of type 2 diabetes has been advocated. The American Diabetes Association recommends not only good glycemic control but also identification and aggressive treatment of associated cardiovascular risk factors, with more stringent target levels for lipids and blood pressure than those recommended for the general population. Studies have shown that an intensified and goal-oriented approach to the treatment of type 2 diabetes addressing tight glucose control, optimal lipid and blood pressure management and the use of antiplatelet agents like aspirin reduces cardiovascular events, as well as nephropathy, retinopathy, and neuropathy.

The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and safety of inhaled insulin delivered by the AERx iDMS in young and elderly patients with type 2 diabetes. Twenty-seven young (18-45 years, inclusive) and 28 elderly (>/= 65 years) type 2 diabetic patients were enrolled in this study. A single inhalation of 1.57 mg (45 IU, effect comparable to 6 s.c. units) of regular human insulin was administered to each patient on each of 2 dosing days, and blood samples were drawn up to 360 minutes postdosing to generate the PK/PD curves. AUC(0-360 min) and Cmax values of inhaled insulin were comparable between young and elderly subjects (p = 0.476 for AUC(0-360 min) and p = 0.414 for Cmax). However, the elderly group had significantly less glucose reduction, as indicated by plasma glucose AOC(0-360) (area over the curve) values (p = 0.011). The intrasubject variability of inhaled insulin using the AERx iDMS was similar for young and elderly subjects and was similar to what has previously been reported for soluble insulin administered subcutaneously. Inhaled insulin was well tolerated in these patients, and no changes in pulmonary function tests were observed. A single inhalation of insulin using the AERx iDMS demonstrated comparable insulin PK profiles between the elderly and young type 2 patients but less glucose reduction in the elderly. Based on these results, elderly diabetic patients may need to inhale more insulin than young patients to achieve similar glycemic control. Long-term clinical trials using the AERx device will be useful to study age-related differences.