Search

In humans and rodents, multiple ERβ variants with sizes ranging from 477–549 amino acids (aa) have been described. The identification of these variants in target tissues has important implications for estrogen signaling and cellular responsiveness. Western blot analysis using two anti-ERβ antibodies specific for mammalian ERβ sequences (PA1-310B and PA1-311) was employed to examine ERβ protein expression in neural tissues from ovariectomized (OVX) cynomolgus macaques and CF-1 mice as well as to assess potential regulatory effects of acute and extended estradiol (E2) treatment. In hypothalamic extracts from both species, a single ERβ immunoreactive (ERβ-ir) band was detected at approximately 54 kDa, corresponding to the expected molecular weight for ERβ477 and/or 485. In cynomolgus females, oral E2 administration for 16 weeks had no apparent effect on hypothalamic ERβ protein expression. In mouse, a single injection of E2 did not change hypothalamic ERβ protein levels 1.5, 4, 8, 16, or 24 h after injection. Extending the hormonal treatment to 4 or 21 days in OVX female mice also had no effect on the level of hypothalamic ERβ protein. Additional regional analyses in female mouse brain with PA1-310B antibody showed that a second, 59 kDa ERβ-ir band was present in cortex, striatum, hippocampus, and amygdala that could represent one or both of the larger ERβ variants (530 and 549aa). The expression level of the second ERβ isoform exhibited regional variation, with the strongest immunoreactivity detected in cortex and amygdala. Elucidating the functions of these ERβ isoforms in the CNS will facilitate our understanding of the tissue- and promoter-specific actions of estrogen. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol, 2005

Androgens exert profound effects on the organization and function of the central nervous system. These effects are mediated by the androgen receptor (AR), a ligand-dependent transcription factor. The mechanisms of AR regulation in neural tissue, however, remain to be fully elucidated. Characterizing this process can provide important information regarding receptor function and AR gene regulation in the brain. Previously, it was shown that testosterone (T) up-regulated neural AR in a dose-dependent manner in both male and female mice. In the present study, whether AR was differentially regulated by the natural agonists T and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) or the nonsteroidal antagonist flutamide (FLU) was assessed. Males were gonadectomized and AR levels were allowed to decline to baseline 3 days after surgery. Changes in AR protein content produced by the various treatments were measured by semiquantitative Western blot of limbic system extracts. Treatment with T or DHT significantly augmented AR 3 and 7 h after hormone administration, but only DHT sustained this increase for 21 h. This difference also was observed when males were given T plus finasteride (FIN, a 5alpha reductase inhibitor). The findings demonstrate that the two endogenous ligands have differential time course effects on neural AR. The antiandrogen FLU failed to up-regulate AR at doses up to 100 times higher than T or DHT. When administered concomitantly with T or DHT, it effectively inhibited the augmentation of AR normally seen 3 h after androgen treatment. While immunohistochemical studies showed that FLU was able to promote nuclear translocation of AR, Western analysis revealed that FLU, in contrast to T and DHT, failed to maintain the integrity of AR. The results demonstrate that (a) the endogenous androgens T and DHT regulate AR differently, suggesting a potential cellular mechanism that may contribute to the difference in neural target gene sensitivity to these androgens; (b) up-regulation of AR occurs only in the presence of agonists; (c) the mechanism of action of FLU in the brain involves inhibition of AR protein up-regulation normally seen in response to androgen; and (d) FLU promotes AR nuclear translocation but not augmentation of cellular AR populations. These findings demonstrate that in vivo AR regulation in the brain basically parallels mechanisms proposed from results obtained with transfected cells and cell lines.

There are multiple pathways involved in the regulation of male typical aggression by T, and the functional pathway is determined by genotype. Target-tissue sensitivity to the aggression-promoting properties of T and its estrogenic and androgenic metabolites is determined by a complex sequence of events in which steroid receptors play a critical role. To date, it appears that the relative density of AR may be an important factor in the biobehavioral effects of androgens. Regarding sensitivity to estrogens, characterization of ER-NM interactions, and understanding of the contribution of the two activating functions within ER, appears to be necessary to comprehensively describe the cellular basis for responsiveness to the aggression-promoting effect of this T metabolite. In broader terms, these observations indicate that understanding the relationship between T and the expression of aggression in humans will require models that incorporate cellular aspects of steroid hormone action, including metabolism, receptor function, and gene regulation. Language: en