Search

Cure of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) can lead to improvement of health-related quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs). While extensive PRO data for CHC patients who were enrolled in clinical trials are available, similar data for patients seen in real-world practices are scarce. Our aim was to assess PROs of CHC patients enrolled from real-world practices from different regions and to compare them with those enrolled in clinical trials. CHC patients seen in clinical practices and not receiving treatment were enrolled in the Global Liver Registry (GLR). Clinical and PRO (FACIT-F, CLDQ-HCV, WPAI) data were collected and compared with the baseline data from CHC patients enrolled in clinical trials. N = 12,171 CHC patients were included (GLR n = 3146, clinical trial subjects n = 9025). Patients were from 30 countries from 6 out of 7 Global Burden of Disease (GBD) super-regions. Compared with clinical trial enrollees, patients from GLR were less commonly enrolled from High-Income GBD super-region, older, more commonly female, less employed, had more type 2 diabetes, anxiety and clinically overt fatigue but less cirrhosis (all p 0.05). In conclusion, hepatitis C patients seen in the real-world practices have PRO impairment driven by fatigue and psychiatric comorbidities.

Sofosbuvir is a direct acting antiviral (DAA) approved for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Sofosbuvir is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp). For this reason, inhibitors, or inducers of intestinal P-gp may alter the plasma concentration of sofosbuvir and increase or decrease its efficacy causing a significant change in its pharmacokinetic parameters. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between either aged garlic or ginkgo biloba extracts with sofosbuvir through targeting P-gp as well as possible toxicities in rats. Rats were divided into four groups and treated for 14 days with saline, verapamil (15 mg/kg, PO), aged garlic extract (120 mg/kg, PO), or ginkgo biloba extract (25 mg/kg, PO) followed by a single oral dose of sofosbuvir (40 mg/kg). Validated LC-MS/MS was used to determine sofosbuvir and its metabolite GS-331007 in rat plasma. Aged garlic extract caused a significant decrease of sofosbuvir AUC

The PRIORITIZE trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02786537) was the first comparative effectiveness study to directly compare ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) and elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). A secondary aim of this study was to compare LDV/SOF and EBR/GZR on sustainable changes in several HCV-associated symptoms and functional well-being in patients who achieved sustained virological response (SVR). PRIORITIZE, a randomized controlled trial conducted between 2016 and 2020, evaluated change in six PROMIS® symptom scores (fatigue, sleep disturbance, cognitive disturbance, nausea, diarrhoea, abdominal pain) and functional well-being using the disease-specific HCV-PRO instrument. Survey assessments were administered at baseline, early post-treatment (median = 6 months) and late post-treatment (median = 21 months). Constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate within-treatment change and between-treatment differences. Data from 793 participants (average 55 years old, 57% male, 44% black, 17% with cirrhosis) were analysed. From baseline to early post-treatment, 5 out of 6 symptoms and functional well-being significantly improved (all p's .05). In the LDV/SOF arm, mean changes ranged from -3.73 for nausea to -6.41 for fatigue and in the EBR/GZR, mean changes ranged from -2.19 for cognitive impairment to -4.67 for fatigue. Change of3 points was consider clinically meaningful. Improvements in most symptoms slightly favoured LDV/SOF, although the magnitude of differences between the regimens were small. Both regimens demonstrated significant improvements in symptoms and functional well-being that were sustained during the late post-treatment phase. EBR/GZR and LDV/SOF regimens had clinically equivalent and durable improvements in HCV symptoms and functional well-being up to two years after SVR.

The objective of this study was to determine the clinical relationship between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Data was collected on patients from 128 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers throughout the United States.This study included veterans aged 18-89 years with viremic HCV who received a full course of SOF/VEL treatment from June 2016 - July 2017.Sustained viral response was compared in patients taking SOF/VEL with or without concurrent PPI prescriptions.Analysis of the primary outcome was completed utilizing logistic regression. The relationship between SVR and PPI use was adjusted for African-American race, presence of cirrhosis, prior treatment, BMI greater than 30 kg/m2, and HCV genotype. The final analysis included 4,008 veterans, 830 with concomitant PPI use and 3,178 without PPI use. After adjustment for other variables in the logistic model, there was no statistically significant association between PPI use and lower SVR (odds ratio 0.67; 95%CI: 0.42, 1.06; p = 0.087).Concomitant PPI treatment adjusted for other variables did not significantly impact success or failure of SOF/VEL treatment of chronic HCV. Despite the lack of significant association identified in this study, in efforts to provide the best care possible, it remains prudent to proceed with caution in patients desiring to use PPI therapy while receiving SOF/VEL, and ensure prescribing instructions are closely followed in regard to concomitant PPI use, especially in patients with other risk factors for decreased SVR.

According to pivotal clinical trials, cure rates for sofosbuvir-based antiviral therapy exceed 96%. Treatment failure is usually assumed to be because of virological resistance-associated substitutions or clinical risk factors, yet the role of patient-specific genetic factors has not been well explored. We determined if patient-specific genetic factors help predict patients likely to fail sofosbuvir treatment in real-world treatment situations.We recruited sofosbuvir-treated patients with chronic hepatitis C from five Canadian treatment sites, and performed a case-control pharmacogenomics study assessing both previously published and novel genetic polymorphisms. Specifically studied were variants predicted to impair CES1-dependent production of sofosbuvir's active metabolite, interferon-λ signalling variants expected to impact a patient's immune response to the virus and an HLA variant associated with increased spontaneous and treatment-induced viral clearance.Three hundred and fifty-nine sofosbuvir-treated patients were available for analyses after exclusions, with 34 (9.5%) failing treatment. We identified CES1 variants as novel predictors for treatment failure in European patients (rs115629050 or rs4513095; odds ratio (OR): 5.43; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.64-18.01; P = .0057), replicated associations with IFNL4 variants predicted to increase interferon-λ signalling (eg rs12979860; OR: 2.25; 95% CI: 1.25-4.06; P = .0071) and discovered a novel association with a coding variant predicted to enhance the activity of IFNL4's receptor (rs2834167 in IL10RB; OR: 1.81; 95% CI: 1.01-3.24; P = .047).Ultimately, this work demonstrates that patient-specific genetic factors could be used as a tool to identify patients at higher risk of treatment failure and allow for these patients to receive effective therapy sooner.

John Charles Martin should be remembered as a visionary medicinal chemist who was involved in the coinvention, development, or management of many FDA-approved antiviral drugs such as ganciclovir, stavudine, didanosine, cidofovir, oseltamivir, adefovir dipivoxil, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, tenofovir alafenamide, sofosbuvir, and remdesivir.

Summary Sofosbuvir and Daclatasvir are among the direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) medications prescribed for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) virus infection as combination therapy with other antiviral medications. DAA‐based therapy achieves high cure rates, reaching up to 97% depending on the genotype of the causative hepatitis C virus (HCV). While DAAs have been approved as an efficient and well‐tolerated therapy for CHC, emerging concerns about adverse cardiac side effects, higher risk of recurrence and occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and doubts of genotoxicity have been reported. In our study, we investigated in detail physiological off‐targets of DAAs and dissected the effects of these drugs on cellular organelles using budding yeast, a unicellular eukaryotic organism. DAAs were found to disturb the architecture of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the mitochondria, while showing no apparent genotoxicity or DNA damaging effect. Our study provides evidence that DAAs are not associated with genotoxicity and highlights the necessity for adjunctive antioxidant therapy to mitigate the adverse effects of DAAs on ER and mitochondria.

The real-world virological efficacy and safety of interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy with sofosbuvir (SOF) and velpatasvir (VEL) were assessed in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1- and 2-infected patients with decompensated cirrhosis. A total of 65 patients with HCV-related decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh score of 7 points or more) who were treated with the SOF/VEL regimen were enrolled. The sustained virological response (SVR) rate and safety profile were analyzed. SVR was defined as undetectable serum HCV RNA at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). The percentages of patients with undetectable HCV RNA at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the start of therapy were 81.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 69.5-89.9) (52/64), 98.4% (95% CI, 91.2-100.0) (60/61), and 98.5% (95% CI, 91.7-100.0) (64/65), respectively. The overall SVR rate was 92.3% (95% CI, 83.0-97.5) (60/65). Albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores decreased during and after treatment (p

In this study, rapid resonance Rayleigh scattering (RRS), spectrophotometric, and spectrofluorimetric methods were performed for facile quantitation of daclatasvir dihydrochloride without interference from sofosbuvir (a co-formulated anti-hepatitis C virus drug). The proposed approaches were based on forming a binary complex between daclatasvir dihydrochloride and merbromin reagent at pH 4.1. The binary complex was measured spectrophotometrically at λmax = 544 nm. The spectrofluorimetric approach relied on the quenching effect of daclatasvir dihydrochloride on the fluorescence strength of merbromin at λEmission = 545 nm. The RRS approach depended on augmentation in the merbromin RRS spectrum at 363 nm upon addition of daclatasvir dihydrochloride. The presented methodologies were linear over the concentration ranges 2.5-15.0, 0.2-1.6 and 0.15-3.0 μg ml-1 with detection limits of 0.45, 0.046, and 0.036 μg ml-1 for the spectrophotometric approach, the spectrofluorometric approach, and RRS approach, respectively. Current approaches were validated in compliance with International Council for Harmonisation guidelines and utilized practically to estimate daclatasvir dihydrochloride either in binary mixtures with sofosbuvir or in its commercial tablet dosage form with good results. Moreover, the test for content uniformity was applied successfully on commercial tablets using the current spectroscopic approaches.

Background Pangenotypic direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) are effective against all hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype infections. However, data on pangenotypic DAA treatment for mixed genotype HCV infection are sparse. Methods This is a retrospective, single site cohort study analyzing all patients with mixed HCV genotype infections treated with GLE/PIB or SOF/VEL from August 2018 to August 2020 in Chiayi Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. The primary study endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR) 12 weeks after treatment cessation. We also reported adverse events (AEs). Results A total of 108 patients with mixed infections of any two or three genotypes of 1a, 1b, 2, 3, and 6 received pangenotypic DAAs during the study period. A total of 67 patients received GLE/PIB and 41 received SOF/VEL. The evaluable population analysis revealed SVR rates of 94% (63/67) and 95.1% (39/41) for GLE/PIB and SOF/VEL therapy, respectively, and the per-protocol analysis revealed an SVR of 100% for both regimens. Four patients in the GLE/PIB group and two patients in the SOF/VEL were lost to follow-up. The most common AEs for GLE/PIB versus SOF/VEL therapy included pruritus (14.9% vs 2.4%), fatigue (6.0% vs 7.3%), abdominal discomfort (4.5% vs 7.3%), and acid reflux (3.0% vs 4.9%). DAA-related significant laboratory abnormalities occurred in three patients with > 1.5 × elevated bilirubin level in the GLE/PIB group. None of the above AEs resulted in DAA discontinuation. Conclusions Pangenotypic DAAs are well tolerated by and yield high SVR rates in patients with mixed genotype HCV infection.

The nephrotoxicity of sofosbuvir (SOF) on human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis C virus (HIV/HCV)-coinfected patients receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains controversial. We prospectively compared the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) changes in 167 patients receiving SOF-based direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) who also received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TFV)-based (n = 116) and TFV-free ART (n = 51). The eGFR was assessed by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation, and the eGFR changes between ART regimens were compared by the generalized estimated equation. During DAA treatment, participants on TFV-based ART had a higher eGFR decline than those on TFV-free ART (slope coefficient difference: -0.82 ml/min/1.73 m2 /month [95% CI: -1.21 to -0.43]; p < 0.001), whereas the eGFR changes did not differ between groups (slope coefficient difference: 0.13 ml/min/1.73 m2 /month [95% CI: -0.32 to 0.58]; p = 0.42) after discontinuing DAAs. Participants on TFV TDF-based ART had a higher eGFR decline than those on TFV alafenamide fumarate (TAF)-based ART (slope coefficient difference: -0.31 ml/min/1.73 m2 /month [95% CI: -0.50 to -0.12]; p = 0.01). After discontinuing DAAs, the eGFR changes did not differ between groups (slope coefficient difference: 0.06 ml/min/1.73 m2 /month [95% CI: -0.98 to 1.10]; p = 0.91). In conclusion, HIV/HCV-coinfected patients on TFV-based ART had a slight eGFR decline compared to those on TFV-free ART during SOF-based DAA therapy. A similar trend between TDF-based and TAF-based ART was also observed. Because the differences of eGFR changes are limited, the physicians should not discourage the use of SOF-based DAAs in HIV-positive patients on TFV-based ART.

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is a major cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and mortality. Eliminating hepatitis C virus (HCV) can greatly improve long‐term outcomes. Several direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAAs), including sofosbuvir (SOF) plus different NS5A inhibitors, as well as non‐SOF‐based DAAs, including glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), have been approved for treating CHC genotype‐2 (GT‐2) patients in Taiwan. However, there is limited real‐world effectiveness data regarding these different regimens. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the real‐world efficacy in CHC GT‐2 patients who underwent these DAA regimens. We retrospectively enrolled CHC GT‐2 patients who were treated with SOF‐based DAAs or GLE/PIB at a single medical center. A total of 704 enrolled patients were treated with either SOF + ribavirin (RBV), SOF/daclatasvir (DCV) ± RBV, SOF/ledipasvir (LDV) ± RBV, SOF/velpatasvir (VEL) ± RBV, or with GLE/PIB. The overall sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 97.9%. The SVR rate was significantly lower in the SOF + RBV group (95.6%) than in the non‐SOF + RBV (98.9%) group, especially compared to the SOF/DCV (100%) and GLE/PIB groups (99.5%). Among patients treated with SOF + RBV, cirrhotic patients had significantly lower SVR rates than noncirrhotic patients (89.4% vs 98.2%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with a younger age, hepatitis B virus coinfection, baseline cirrhosis, or those who received SOF + RBV were less likely to achieve SVR. In conclusion, for CHC GT‐2 patients, SOF in combination with DCV, LDV, or VEL, as well as GLE/PIB, achieved similar high efficacies, regardless of cirrhosis, treatment experience, or chronic kidney disease status. Therefore, the use of DAA therapy to eradicate HCV should not be delayed in these populations.

The use of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) in patients with chronic HCV genotype (GT) 1 infection results in sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of 95%-97%, but 3%-5% of patients experience virologic failure. We observed 41 patients infected with HCV subtype 1b who failed previous treatment with DAAs, including 37 subjects (90.2%) with liver cirrhosis. In total, 30 (73.2%) subjects previously received NS5A inhibitors of the first generation (ledipasvir, daclatasvir, or ombitasvir) and 11 subjects (26.8%) received NS5A inhibitors of the second generation (velpatasvir). All patients received retreatment with a combination of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir (3D) with sofosbuvir (SOF) and ribavirin (RBV). We compared SVR12 rates depending on fibrosis stage, presence of just single or double NS5A mutation (L31M/V/I and/or Y93H), and the generation of previously used NS5A inhibitors. Observed SVR12 rates were as follows: 97.6% (40/41 patients) overall; 100% in patients without cirrhosis (n = 4) versus 97.3% in those with cirrhosis (n = 37); 100% with single L31M/V/I or Y93H mutation (n = 22) versus 94.4% with double mutations (n = 18); 100% in patients who failed previous treatment with first-generation (n = 30) versus 90.9% in those who failed previous treatment with second-generation NS5A inhibitors (n = 11). Retreatment with 3D + SOF + RBV was highly effective and safe in patients with chronic HCV GT1b infection, including those with liver cirrhosis, who failed previous treatment with DAA containing NS5A inhibitors. Fibrosis stage and single or simultaneous presence of NS5A RASs L31M/V/I and Y93H at the baseline, as well as the generation of previously used NS5A inhibitors, did not impact SVR12 rates.

Background/aims Direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) are highly effective in treating chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐infected patients. The real‐world treatment outcome in Taiwanese patients on a nationwide basis is elusive. Methods The Taiwan HCV Registry (TACR) programme is a nationwide registry platform including 48 study sites, which is organized and supervised by the Taiwan Association for the Study of the Liver. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response (SVR12, undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks after end‐of‐treatment). Results A total of 13 951 registered patients with SVR12 data available were analysed (mean age, 63.0 years; female, 55.9%; HCV genotype‐1 [GT1], 57.9%; cirrhosis, 38.4%; preexisting hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC], 10.6%; and hepatitis B virus coinfection, 7.7%). The overall SVR12 rate was 98.3%, with 98.7%, 98.0%, 98.4% and 97.4% in treatment‐naïve noncirrhotic, treatment‐naïve cirrhotic, treatment‐experienced noncirrhotic and treatment‐experienced cirrhotic patients, respectively. The SVR12 rate was > 95% across all subgroups except treatment‐experienced cirrhotic patients who received sofosbuvir/ribavirin (88.7%), treatment‐naïve noncirrhotic patients (94.8%) and treatment‐experienced cirrhotic (94.8%) patients who received daclatasvir/asunaprevir. The most important factor associated with treatment failure was DAA adherence

Background and Aim This single‐arm, open‐label, multicenter, phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of seraprevir, an hepatitis C virus (HCV) nonstructural protein 3/4A (NS3/4A) inhibitor, combined with sofosbuvir for treating Chinese patients with chronic HCV infection without cirrhosis. Methods Treatment‐naive or interferon‐experienced adult patients without cirrhosis were treated with a universal, combinational regimen of seraprevir 100 mg, twice daily and sofosbuvir 400 mg, once daily, for 12 or 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response at week 12 after treatment (SVR12). Results Overall, 205 patients with genotype 1 HCV infection without cirrhosis were enrolled from 23 sites, 202 of whom completed the full treatment and post‐treatment course and 3 discontinued follow‐up. In total, 27 patients (13.2%) were interferon experienced. SVR12 was achieved by 201 out of 205 (98.0% [95% CI, 95.1%, 99.5%]) patients, 100.0% of patients with genotype 1a, and 98.0% of genotype 1b. In the other exploratory study, SVR 12 was achieved by 100% patients with genotype 2 (n = 21), genotype 3 (n = 7), and genotype 6 (n = 8). The majority of adverse events were mild to moderate and transient and did not require a specific medical intervention. Conclusions The all‐oral, ribavirin‐free regimen of seraprevir and sofosbuvir is an effective and well‐tolerated treatment option for Chinese patients mono‐infected with HCV, including those with a history of interferon treatment.

Background and aims The long-term impact of hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy with all-oral direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has not been well-described. We characterized changes in PROs from pre-treatment to 12 months post-treatment in a real-world cohort. Methods PROP UP was a multi-center observational cohort study of 1,601 patients treated with DAAs at 11 U.S. gastroenterology/hepatology practices from 2015-2017. PROs were evaluated pre-treatment (T1) and 12 months post-treatment (T5). A minimally important change (MIC) threshold was prespecified as >5% change in PRO scores from T1 to T5. Multivariable analyses identified predictors of change. Results Three-quarters of patients were 55 or older; 45% were female, 60% were white, 33% were black, nearly half had cirrhosis. The most commonly-prescribed DAA regimens were sofosbuvir-based (83%) and grazoprevir/elbasvir (11%). Study retention was greater than 95%. On average, small improvements were observed at 3 months post-treatment in all PROs and sustained at 12 months post-treatment among patients with sustained virologic response (SVR). Clinically meaningful improvements were achieved in fatigue (mean change score: -3.7 [-4.2, -3.1]), sleep (mean change score: -3.1 [-3.7, -2.5]), abdominal pain (mean change score: -2.6 [-3.3, -1.9]) and functional well-being (mean change score: -7.0 [-6.0, -8.0]). Symptom improvements were generally not sustained with no SVR (n=52). Patients with cirrhosis and MELD ≥ 12 had the greatest improvements in functional well-being (-12.9 [-17.6, -8.1]). Conclusions The improvements in patient-reported outcomes reported by patients who achieved SVR following HCV DAA therapy were durable at 12 months post-treatment.

BACKGROUND AND AIM Real-world data on sofosbuvir/velpatasvir with and without ribavirin (SOF/VEL ± RBV), particularly among patients with genotype 3 (GT3) decompensated cirrhosis, prior treatment, coinfection, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of SOF/VEL ± RBV in a real-world setting that included both community and incarcerated GT3 hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients. METHODS We included all GT3 HCV patients treated with SOF/VEL ± RBV in our institution. The primary outcome measure was the overall sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12), reported in both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analyses. The secondary outcome measures were SVR12 stratified by the presence of decompensated cirrhosis, prior treatment, HCC, and HIV/hepatitis C virus coinfection and the occurrence rate of serious adverse events requiring treatment cessation or hospitalization. RESULTS A total of 779 HCV patients were treated with 12 weeks of SOF/VEL ± RBV, of which 85% were treated during incarceration. Among the 530 GT3 HCV patients, 31% had liver cirrhosis, and 6% were treatment-experienced. The overall SVR12 for GT3 was 98.7% (95% confidence interval: 97.3%, 99.5%) and 99.2% (95% confidence interval: 98.1%, 99.8%) in ITT and per-protocol analyses, respectively. High SVR12 was also seen in ITT analysis among GT3 HCV patients with decompensated cirrhosis (88%), prior treatment (100%), HCC (100%), and HIV/hepatitis B virus coinfection (100%). Apart from one patient who developed myositis, no other serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION The SOF/VEL ± RBV is a safe and efficacious treatment option for GT3 HCV patients in a real-world setting. SOF/VEL with RBV may be considered for decompensated GT3 HCV patients.

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have proven highly effective against chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, some patients experience treatment failure, associated with resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). Our aim was to investigate the complete viral coding sequence in hepatitis C patients treated with DAAs to identify RASs and the effects of treatment on the viral population. We selected 22 HCV patients with sustained virologic response (SVR) to match 21 treatment-failure patients in relation to HCV genotype, DAA regimen, liver cirrhosis and previous treatment experience. Viral-titre data were compared between the two patient groups, and HCV full-length open reading frame deep-sequencing was performed. The proportion of HCV NS5A-RASs at baseline was higher in treatment-failure (82%) than matched SVR patients (25%) (p =.0063). Also, treatment failure was associated with slower declines in viraemia titres. Viral population diversity did not differ at baseline between SVR and treatment-failure patients, but failure was associated with decreased diversity probably caused by selection for RAS. The NS5B-substitution 150V was associated with sofosbuvir treatment failure in genotype 3a. Further, mutations identified in NS2, NS3-helicase and NS5A-domain-III were associated with DAA treatment failure in genotype 1a patients. Six retreated HCV patients (35%) experienced 2nd treatment failure; RASs were present in 67% compared to 11% with SVR. In conclusion, baseline RASs to NS5A inhibitors, but not virus population diversity, and lower viral titre decline predicted HCV treatment failure. Mutations outside of the DAA targets can be associated with DAA treatment failure. Successful DAA retreatment in patients with treatment failure was hampered by previously selected RASs.

Combination regimens of direct‐acting antiviral agents (DAAs) for chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection given for 8 or 12 weeks have high cure rates. Shortened treatment durations that maintain high cure rates may lessen treatment barriers related to affordability and drug adherence. We enrolled 12 treatment‐naïve adults with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection without cirrhosis in a single‐center, open‐label trial to receive 2 weeks of the highly potent and selective non‐nucleoside inhibitor (NNI) CDI‐31244 concurrent with 6 weeks of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. The main efficacy endpoints were sustained virologic response at 12 (SVR12) and 24 (SVR24) weeks after treatment completion. In all patients, plasma HCV RNA levels rapidly decreased during the first 2 days of treatment and were below the lower limit of quantification by the end of the 6‐week treatment period. Eight of 12 (67%) patients achieved both SVR12 and SVR24. Four patients had virological relapse at Week 10, 4 weeks after end of treatment. The most common adverse event was headache, occurring in five (42%) patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed no relevant drug interactions between CDI‐31244, sofosbuvir, and velpatasvir. In this pilot study of short‐duration combination therapy involving a novel NNI with a fixed‐combination DAA, 8 of 12 treatment‐naïve patients with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection without cirrhosis achieved virologic cure. Future trials might evaluate whether extending the NNI duration beyond 2 weeks with combination DAAs results in higher cure rates comparable with currently approved longer duration therapy.

AIM This study aimed to evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of 12-week sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) treatment for patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. METHODS A total 72 of patients with Child-Pugh (CP) class B or C were enrolled. We evaluated the sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12), adverse events (AEs), and changes in the liver function. RESULTS All participants had genotype 1 or 2 HCV infection. At baseline, the numbers of patients with CP class B and C were 59 and 13, respectively. The overall SVR12 rate was 95.8% (69/72); 94.9% (56/59) in CP class B and 100% (13/13) in CP class C. The serum albumin level, prothrombin time and ascites were significantly improved (P

Access to hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing and treatment is limited in Myanmar. We assessed an integrated HIV and viral hepatitis testing and HCV treatment strategy. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) ± weight‐based ribavirin for 12 weeks was provided at three treatment sites in Myanmar and sustained virologic response (SVR) assessed at 12 weeks after treatment. Participants co‐infected with HBV were treated concurrently with tenofovir. Cost estimates in 2018 USD were made at Yangon and Mandalay using standard micro‐costing methods. 803 participants initiated SOF/VEL; 4.8% were lost to follow‐up. SVR was achieved in 680/803 (84.6%) by intention‐to‐treat analysis. SVR amongst people who inject drugs (PWID) was 79.7% (381/497), but 92.5% among PWID on opioid substitution therapy (OST) (74/80), and 97.4% among non‐PWID (298/306). Utilizing data from 492 participants, of whom 93% achieved SVR, the estimated average cost of treatment per patient initiated was $1030 (of which 54% were medication costs), with a production cost per successful outcome (SVR) of $1109 and real‐world estimate of $1250. High SVR rates were achieved for non‐PWID and PWID on OST. However, the estimated average cost of the intervention (under the assumption of no genotype testing and reduced real‐world effectiveness) of $1250/patient is unaffordable for a national elimination strategy. Reductions in the cost of antivirals and linkage to social and behavioural health services including substance use disorder treatment to increase retention and adherence to treatment are critical to HCV elimination in this population.

Aim The combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) has been approved for the treatment of various hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes across many countries. This article presents an integrated analysis of three prospective phase II/III trials in the Asia-Pacific region to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 12 weeks of LDV/SOF in HCV genotype 2 patients without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis. Methods A total of 200 patients were included in the integrated analysis. The primary end-point was the rate of sustained virologic response for 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12), analyzed by fibrosis stage, treatment history, HCV genotype subtype, and presence of baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RAS). Safety was evaluated by adverse events and laboratory abnormalities. Results Twelve weeks of treatment with LDV/SOF was associated with high SVR12 rates (overall 98%) in patients with genotype 2 HCV, irrespective of fibrosis stage, treatment history, genotype 2 subtype, and presence of baseline non-structural protein 5A resistance-associated substitution (NS5A RAS), and LDV/SOF was well tolerated. Conclusions Twelve weeks of treatment with LDV/SOF provides a highly effective and safe treatment for patients with genotype 2 HCV, including those with advanced fibrosis. As a ribavirin-free and protease inhibitor-free regimen with minimal on-treatment monitoring requirements, LDV/SOF can potentially play a crucial role in achieving the WHO's goal of HCV elimination.

Direct‐acting antiviral therapies (DAAs) may improve kidney function and proteinuria in certain patients with hepatitis C infection (HCV) and chronic kidney disease (CKD). To improve our understanding of HCV‐mediated kidney dysfunction, we aimed to evaluate the baseline predictors of improvement in proteinuria after DAAs in a single‐arm, pilot, clinical trial of ledipasvir 90 mg/sofosbuvir 400 mg once daily for patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection and proteinuric CKD (≥300 mg proteinuria per gram creatinine). Plasma biomarkers of complement system (C3 and C4) and urinary kidney injury biomarkers were measured at baseline, 8 weeks on treatment, 12 weeks following treatment, and 1 year following treatment. We then conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients at Partners Healthcare who had baseline complement component 4 (C4) measured before DAAs for HCV and evaluated the change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before and after therapy. Ten patients with HCV and proteinuric CKD were enrolled in the trial. The mean age was 64 years, 70% male, 70% white, and 30% black. Baseline creatinine was 1.25 mg/dL (SD 0.44), eGFR was 65 mL/min/1.73 m2 (SD 29), and proteinuria was 0.98 g/g creatinine (SD 0.7). Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks was achieved by 80% of patients. Patients with low baseline C4 had improved proteinuria, urinary neutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin, and interleukin‐18 after ledipasvir and sofosbuvir treatment. The retrospective study included 50 patients with CKD and HCV. Twenty patients (40%) had low baseline C4; these patients significantly improved their eGFR (+3.4 ± 11.2 mL/min/1.73 m2) compared to those with normal baseline C4 (−4.4 ± 12.2 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = 0.028). Conclusion: Low C4 may be a marker of kidney dysfunction that improves with DAA therapy.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication deteriorates lipid profiles. Although HCV eradication may reduce the risk of vascular events as a whole, whether deteriorated lipid profiles increases the risk of cardio‐cerebral disease in certain patients is elusive. Serial lipid profiles were measured before, during, at and 3 months after the end of direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) therapy, and annually thereafter in chronic hepatitis C patients who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR, undetectable HCV RNA at posttreatment week 12). The primary end‐point was the occurrence of the events. A total of 617 patients were included, with a mean follow‐up period of 26.8 months (range: 1‐65 months). The total cholesterol and low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) levels increased significantly from treatment week 4 to 2 years after treatment. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the factors independently associated with a significant cholesterol increase included age (odds ratio [OR]/95% confidence intervals [CIs]:1.02/1.006‐1.039, P = .007) and smoking (OR/CI:3.21/1.14‐9.02, P = .027). Five patients developed cardio‐cerebral diseases during 1376 person‐years follow‐up period. Compared to patients without vascular events, a significantly higher proportion of those with vascular events experienced an LDL‐C surge >40% (80% vs 19.9%, P = .001). Cox‐regression analysis revealed that an LDL‐C surge >40% was the only factor predictive of vascular events (HR/CI: 15.44/1.73‐138.20, P = .014). Dyslipidemia occurred after HCV eradication, and it was associated with the risk of cardio‐cerebrovascular diseases. Attention should also be paid to the extrahepatic consequence beyond liver‐related complications in the post‐SVR era.

Direct acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionized hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment, but drug resistance could undermine proposed global elimination targets. Real-world studies are needed to inform the impact of widespread DAA treatment on antiviral resistance in the community. The prevalence and range of posttreatment resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) was determined in Australian patients with open access to DAAs through a wide range of prescribers. NS3, NS5A, and NS5B regions were amplified by polymerase chain reaction and analyzed by population sequencing. Clinically relevant RASs were identified using online databases (ReCALL and Geno2Pheno[hcv]). Of 572 samples, 60% were from genotype 3 and 27% from genotype 1a. Ninety-two percent of people failed a DAA regimen containing an NS5A inhibitor, including 10% with a pangenotype regimen. NS5A RASs were detected in 72% of people with genotype 1 and 80% with genotype 3. For genotype 1, there was a range of RASs across the NS5A region, while for genotype 3, the Y93H RAS predominated (72%). The prevalence of NS3 RASs was higher in people exposed to an NS3 inhibitor (35% vs. 3.9%; P < 0.0001). NS5B resistance was rare, with a single case of sofosbuvir resistance. Multiclass drug resistance was found in 33% of people exposed to both NS3 and NS5A inhibitors. Conclusion: The high prevalence of NS5A RASs among people failing DAA therapy reinforces the importance of specific retreatment regimens, ideally guided by resistance testing. The impact of multiclass drug resistance on retreatment in people exposed to both NS3 and NS5A inhibitors needs to be assessed in real-world studies. Surveillance for increasing antiviral resistance during treatment scale-up is essential to maintain the efficacy of current DAA regimens.

Over 3 million paediatric patients globally and ~50 000 in the United States are estimated to be infected with HCV. Eradicating HCV in children helps prevent liver fibrosis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma; reduces extra-hepatic manifestations of HCV; improves quality of life; and increases survival. The 2019 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA) guidelines now recommend direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment with an approved regimen for all children and adolescents with HCV infection aged ≥3 years. We conducted a descriptive review of the new DAA treatments for HCV infection in the paediatric population. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) and sofosbuvir with ribavirin (SOF/RBV) are now approved for those ≥3 years old under specific clinical scenarios; sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) is the only pangenotypic agent approved for those ≥6 years or ≥17 kg, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) is approved for adolescents ≥12 years old or ≥45 kg. These DAA regimens are well-tolerated and have comparable sustained virologic response rates at 12 weeks post-treatment compared to those reported in adults (close to 100%). The introduction of DAAs has significantly changed the landscape of HCV treatment in adults and children with HCV infection and has increased confidence that the 2030 World Health Organization elimination goal may be attainable. Further studies are warranted to determine the optimal treatment for children with HCV infection, including timing, regimen and duration. Additionally, with the recent paediatric approvals, long-term safety data are needed.

Background In England, choice of hepatitis C therapy is determined by national contracts that change with time, facilitating comparisons between different regimens. England has a diverse population with hepatitis C including large proportions of uncommon viral genotypes. Aim To evaluate efficacy of directly acting anti-viral treatments for hepatitis C in England using real-world data from the national treatment registry. Methods Sustained virological response (SVR) rates 12 weeks after treatment completion for patients treated between 2014 and August 2018 who attended for SVR tests were analysed in univariate subgroups using Chi-squared tests. Multivariate models were constructed with clinically relevant variables to determine predictors of SVR and evaluate the impact of treatment regimens. Results SVR data were available on 14,603 treated patients. The overall SVR rate was 95.59% [95% CI 95.25%-95.91%]. Multivariable regression modelling in patients with genotype 1 infection showed that the odds of SVR with elbasvir/grazoprevir were higher than for those treated with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (OR 1.891, 95% CI 1.072-3.336, P = 0.028). For genotype 3, we found no significant difference between any of the treatment regimens. Patients who completed at least one third of the planned treatment duration achieved SVR rates in excess of 80%. Conclusions All of the currently licensed hepatitis C direct-acting anti-viral regimens had similar efficacy (>95%) in an unselected population. Noncompletion of planned treatment duration still resulted in over 80% SVR rates provided that more than one third of treatment was completed.

Data on direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) treatment for mixed genotype hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are scant. This study examined the effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for mixed HCV genotype infection in a real-world setting in Taiwan. We analysed the data from all patients with mixed HCV genotype infections treated with GLE/PIB or LDV/SOF from 2017 to 2019 in three Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals in Taiwan. The primary treatment outcome was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment cessation (SVR12). Adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. A total of 5190 HCV patients received DAA treatment during this time period. Among them, 116 patients (2.2%) had mixed infections of any 2 or 3 genotypes of 1a, 1b, 2, 3 and 6. Fifty-four patients received GLE/PIB and 62 received LDV/SOF. SVR12 rates for LDV/SOF vs GLE/PIB therapy were 96.6% (56/58) vs 100% (51/51) by the per-protocol analysis and 90.3% (56/62) vs 94.4% (51/54) by the evaluable population analysis. Two patients with 1b + 6 and 1b + 2 genotype infections in the LDV/SOF group had relapse. Evaluating the GLE/PIB vs LDV/SOF groups for the most common AEs revealed pruritus (16.7% vs 4.8%), abdominal discomfort (5.6% vs 8%) and fatigue (5.6% vs 4.8%). One patient with AE-related treatment discontinuation presented with liver decompensation after 4-week GLE/PIB therapy. DAA-related significant laboratory abnormalities occurred in two patients with >3× elevated bilirubin level in the GLE/PIB group. GLE/PIB and LDV/SOF are well tolerated and achieve high SVR12 rates for patients with mixed HCV genotype infection.

The use of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection results in sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of 95%-97%, but 3%-5% of patients experience virologic failure. We observed 17 patients infected with HCV subtype 1b who failed previous treatment with DAA, including 13 subjects (76.5%) with liver cirrhosis. Twelve subjects (70.6%) previously received NS5A inhibitors of the first generation (ledipasvir or daclatasvir) and five subjects (29.4%) - the second generation (velpatasvir). All patients were retreated with a combination of ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and dasabuvir (3D) with sofosbuvir (SOF) and ribavirin (RBV). We compared SVR12 rates depending on fibrosis stage, presence of just single or double NS5A mutations (L31M/V/I and/or Y93H), and on the generation of previously used NS5A inhibitor. Observed SVR12 rates were as follows: 94.1% (16/17 patients) overall; 100% in patients without cirrhosis (n = 4) vs 92.3% in those with cirrhosis (n = 13); 100% with single L31M/V/I or Y93H mutation (n = 7) vs 88.9% with double mutations (n = 9); 100% in patients who previously failed first generation (n = 12) vs 80.0% in those failed second-generation NS5A inhibitors (n = 5). Retreatment with 3D + 0SOF + RBV was highly effective and safe in patients with chronic HCV GT1b infection who failed previous use of NS5A inhibitors. Fibrosis stage, baseline presence of NS5A RAS mutations and the generation of previously used NS5A inhibitors may impact the probability of achieving SVR12 , but statistical significance was not demonstrated in our small retrospective cohort. Further studies in a larger population are needed to confirm or not the predictive value of these baseline factors.

A validated thin-layer chromatography (TLC) method combined with fluorescence detection mode was developed for the selective determination of a recently approved anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) drug (velpatasvir). The separation was performed on silica gel 60 F254 plates using ethylacetate:methanol:triethylamine (48:1.5:1.0, v/v/v) as a mobile phase. Plates were scanned in the fluorescence mode after excitation at 335 nm. This method provided an excellent separation of velpatasvir from sofosbuvir with RF values of 0.22 and 0.46 for velpatasvir and sofosbuvir, respectively, after scanning the developed plates in the ultraviolet detection mode at 335 nm. The calibration curve was linear over the range 4-40 ng/band with a correlation coefficient of 0.9994. The developed procedure was validated according to ICH guidelines with a detection limit of 1.30 ng/band and quantitation limit of 3.95 ng/band. The suggested method could selectively determine velpatasvir with high sensitivity in a synthetic tablet powder containing a co-formulated anti-HCV drug (sofosbuvir) without any interference from excipients or sofosbuvir. In addition, the method was successfully applied for determination of velpatasvir in spiked human plasma with adequate % recovery.

Summary Twelve weeks sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) is a highly effective pan‐genotypic regimen for hepatitis C. Phase 2 data suggest 8 weeks of treatment may be sufficient for previously untreated noncirrhotic patients with genotype 3 (GT3) infection. To maximize the number of patients potentially cured within a fixed treatment budget, we elected to treat such patients locally eligible for treatment (F2/3), with 8 weeks of SOF/VEL. By local protocol, treatment‐naive patients with F2 (LSM > 6.9kPa

BACKGROUND Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is highly curative and tolerable. Among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), optimal timing of DAA therapy remains unclear. Data on efficacy of DAA therapy in patients with HCC would inform this decision-making. AIM To evaluate response to DAA therapy among patients diagnosed with HCV infection and HCC. METHODS Bibliographic databases and conference abstracts were searched. Meta-analysis was conducted to pool sustained virologic response (SVR) estimates. RESULTS Fifty-six studies with 5522 patients with HCV and HCC were included. Overall SVR was 88.3% (95% CI 86.1-90.4). Twenty-seven studies included patients with prior or present HCC (n = 3126) and patients without HCC (n = 49 138), in which SVR was 88.2% (95% CI 85.0-91.4) and 92.4% (95% CI 91.1-93.7) among patients with and without HCC, respectively (odds ratio: 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.68, P

Effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies could be influenced by patient characteristics such as comorbid conditions, which could lead to premature treatment discontinuation and/or irregular medical follow-ups. Here, we evaluate loss to follow-up and treatment effectiveness of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir ± ribavirin (SOF/LDV ± RBV), ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir ± ribavirin (OBV/PTV/r + DSV ± RBV) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 (GT1) and sofosbuvir + ribavirin (SOF + RBV) for genotype 3 (GT3) in British Columbia Canada: The British Columbia Hepatitis Testers Cohort includes data on individuals tested for HCV since 1992, integrated with medical visit, hospitalization and prescription drug data. HCV-positive individuals who initiated DAA regimens, irrespective of treatment completion, for GT1 and GT3 until 31 December, 2017 were included. Factors associated with sustained virological response (SVR) and loss to follow-up were assessed by using multivariable logistic regression models. In total 4477 individuals initiated DAAs. The most common prescribed DAA was SOF/LDV ± RBV with SVR of 95%. The highest SVR of 99.5% was observed among OBV/PTV/r + DSV-treated patients. Overall, 453 (10.1%) individuals were lost to follow-up. Higher loss to follow-up was observed among GT1 patients treated with OBV (17.8%) and GT3 patients (15.7%). The loss to follow-up rate was significantly higher among individuals aged

Sustained viral response (SVR) rates for direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection routinely exceed 95%. However, a small number of patients require retreatment. Sofosbuvir, velpatasvir and voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) is a potent DAA combination primarily used for the retreatment of patients who failed by DAA therapies. Here we evaluate retreatment outcomes and the effects of resistance-associated substitutions (RAS) in a real-world cohort, including a large number of genotype (GT)3 infected patients. 144 patients from the UK were retreated with SOF/VEL/VOX following virologic failure with first-line DAA treatment regimens. Full-length HCV genome sequencing was performed prior to retreatment with SOF/VEL/VOX. HCV subtypes were assigned and RAS relevant to each genotype were identified. GT1a and GT3a each made up 38% (GT1a n = 55, GT3a n = 54) of the cohort. 40% (n = 58) of patients had liver cirrhosis of whom 7% (n = 4) were decompensated, 10% (n = 14) had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and 8% (n = 12) had received a liver transplant prior to retreatment. The overall retreatment SVR12 rate was 90% (129/144). On univariate analysis, GT3 infection (50/62; SVR = 81%, p = .009), cirrhosis (47/58; SVR = 81%, p = .01) and prior treatment with SOF/VEL (12/17; SVR = 71%, p = .02) or SOF+DCV (14/19; SVR = 74%, p = .012) were significantly associated with retreatment failure, but existence of pre-retreatment RAS was not when viral genotype was taken into account. Retreatment with SOF/VEL/VOX is very successful for non-GT3-infected patients. However, for GT3-infected patients, particularly those with cirrhosis and failed by initial SOF/VEL treatment, SVR rates were significantly lower and alternative retreatment regimens should be considered.

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir‐based therapies for the treatment of cirrhosis from hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 infection. Data of all consecutive HCV genotype 2 cirrhotic patients who started sofosbuvir‐based treatments between January 2015 and March 2017 in eight Italian tertiary hospitals were collected retrospectively. Overall, 273 patients (Child A: 94.5%) were enrolled. In the 194 subjects treated with sofosbuvir/ribavirin, median initial ribavirin dosage was 13.9 mg/kg/day, and therapy duration was 16 weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 93.8% in intention‐to‐treat (ITT) and 95.3% in per‐protocol (PP) analyses for the 129 treatment‐naïve patients, and 96.9% (ITT) and 98.4% (PP) for the 65 treatment‐experienced subjects. Adverse events were reported in 142 patients (73.2%), but only 1.5% discontinued treatment. Eighty‐eight subjects with treatment‐induced anemia (mild: 34.5%, moderate: 7.7%, severe: 3.1%) had to reduce ribavirin dosage, but SVR rates were comparable to the weight‐based dose group, both in ITT (95.4% and 94.3%) and PP (97.7% and 95.2%) analyses, respectively. Moreover, ITT and PP SVR rates were similar between shorter (

Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd., © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The decay rate of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected cells during therapy has been used to determine the duration of treatment needed to attain a sustained virologic response, but with direct-acting anti-virals (DAA), this rate has been difficult to estimate. Here, we show that it is possible to estimate it, by simultaneously analysing the viral load and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) kinetics during combination DAA therapy. We modelled the HCV RNA and ALT serum kinetics in 26 patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection, under four different sofosbuvir-based combination treatments. In all patients, ALT decayed exponentially to a set point in the normal range by 1-3 weeks after initiation of therapy. The model indicates that the ALT decay rate during the first few weeks after initiation of therapy reflects the death rate of infected cells, with an estimated median half-life of 2.5 days in this patient population. This information allows independent estimation of the rate of loss of intracellular replication complexes during therapy. Our model also predicts that the final ALT set point is not related to the release of ALT by dying HCV-infected cells. Using ALT data, one can separately obtain information about the rate of 'cure' of HCV-infected cells versus their rate of death, something not possible when analysing only HCV RNA data. This information can be used to compare the effects of different DAA combinations and to rationally evaluate their anti-viral effects., Portions of this work were done under the auspices of the US Department of Energy under contract 89233218CNA000001. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. NSF PHY11-25915; by NIH grants R25GM067110, R01AI028433, R01OD011095, R01AI078881, R01AI116868, and P30AI050409; Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Grant no. 2919.01; Cheng Si-yuan (China-international) Hepatitis Research Foundation and Humanity & Health Medical group.

PURPOSE To identify factors associated with the development of adverse drug reactions (ADR) in ribavirin therapeutic regimens. METHODS A multicenter, prospective study was conducted in three public health hospitals in Rio de Janeiro between November 2015 and March 2018. Inclusion criteria were defined by patient follow-up at pharmaceutical consultation at the time of drug dispensing as those who used sofosbuvir in combination with simeprevir, daclatasvir, and/or ribavirin. All patients were invited to participate in the study during the first interview. Adverse drug reactions were reported according to the treatment regimen and frequency of occurrence. Statistical analysis was used to compare adverse reactions between treatments and their associated factors. RESULTS A total of 405 patients were included in the study (mean age 59.6 ± 9.6 years); 61.0% were female, 88.1% were infected with genotype 1, and 65.4% were cirrhotic. The most prescribed treatment was the combination of sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, and ribavirin (55.3%). The majority of patients reported at least one ADR during treatment (83.2%), of which fatigue, anemia, and headache were the most common. Being female (OR = 1.86, [1.08-3.20]) and use of ribavirin (OR: 2.39; 95% CI [1.38-4.13]) were predictors for the development of ADR, which was also associated with development of anemia (OR: 10.28; 95% CI: [5.78-18.30]). Treatment efficacy was 98.1%. CONCLUSIONS Direct-acting antiviral has been shown to be safe and effective. Therefore, use of ribavirin is questionable due to associated adverse reactions and similar efficacy to other treatments.

Background and aim Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 6 is uncommon in Taiwan, and reports of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) treatment for GT6 are few. This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of LDV/SOF in treating chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with GT6 infection. Methods CHC patients that were infected with GT6 and treated for 12 weeks with LDV/SOF at two hospitals were enrolled. All patients were followed for an additional 12 weeks after the completion of LDV/SOF treatment. Demographics, HCV viral load, lipid and sugar profiles, and adverse events were recorded and reviewed. Results A total of 127 patients were enrolled. Cirrhosis was found in 68.2% of them. Sustained virological response (SVR), determined by per-protocol analysis, was 97.6%. The SVR rates for cirrhosis versus non-cirrhosis (96.5% vs 100%, P = 0.229) and low versus high viral load (cutoff value: 106 IU/mL; 100% vs 95.6%, P = 0.108) were similar. Following HCV clearance, significantly lower glycosylated hemoglobin was present both in patients with or without diabetes mellitus. Twenty-three (18.1%) patients exhibited adverse events, and each adverse event presented with an incidence of 0.8% to 3.1%. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were the most common. During treatment, 18 patients (14.2%) had alanine aminotransferase elevations consistent with more than grade 1 abnormalities, and none had signs of decompensation. Renal function remained unchanged. Conclusion The high SVR and excellent safety of LDV/SOF treatment for GT6 CHC patients suggest that LDV/SOF is a favorable option for treating GT6 CHC patients in Taiwan and Asia.

Background Persistence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and response to antiviral therapy has been shown to be associated with inappropriate levels of cytokines and microRNAs (miRNAs). miRNA levels have been reported to fluctuate during treatment. Thus they could be useful predictors for responses to treatment among HCV infected patients, thereby reducing ineffective treatments. Aim The current study aimed to investigate the relation between miRNA-21 expression profiles, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) serum levels and response to treatment with the new direct antiviral drugs (sofosbuvir + daclatasvir ± ribavirin), among HCV infected Egyptian patients. Subjects and methods This prospective study was conducted on 50 HCV infected patients (before and after treatment) and 20 healthy volunteers. miRNA expression profiles were determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction and TGF-β1 serum levels were measured by using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results There was a significant increase in serum albumin, platelets count and a significant decrease in liver enzymes, serum bilirubin, and prothrombin time after treatment. Significant reduction of viral load among HCV patients after receiving the treatment was reported. Concomitantly, there was an increase in the relative quantity of miRNA-21 (P = .001*) and serum levels of TGF-β1 ( P = .337) among HCV patients after receiving treatment. Conclusion Nearly all responders to direct antiviral drugs showed increased levels of both miRNA-21 and TGF-β1. This may indicate an interplay between TGF-β1 and miRNA-21 during remission or progression of viral infection. Thus miRNA-21 could be used as promising serum biomarker, for assessment of antiviral treatment efficacy and improvement of fibrosis among chronically infected HCV patients.

Direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) have revolutionised the management of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We describe UK real‐world DAA experience. Individuals commencing HCV treatment containing a DAA regimen (Mar 2014‐Nov 2016), participating in the National HCV Research UK (HCVRUK) Cohort Study were recruited from 33 UK HCV centers. The data were prospectively entered at sites onto a centralised database. The data were reported as median (Q1‐Q3). Of the 1448 treated patients, 1054 (73%) were males, the median age being 54 years (47‐60), 900 (62%) being genotype 1 and 455 (31%) genotype 3. The majority, 887 (61%) had cirrhosis, and 590 (41%) were treatment‐experienced. DAA regimens utilised: genotype1 sofosbuvir (SOF)/Ledipasvir/±Ribavirin (625/900, 69%) and Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Dasabuvir/±RBV (220/900, 24%), and in genotype 3 SOF/Daclatasvir + RBV (256/455, 56%) and SOF/pegylated interferon/RBV (157/455, 35%). Overall, 1321 (91%) achieved sustained virological response (SVR12), genotype 1 vs 3, 93% vs 87%, P