Search

New finding What is the central question of this study? Transition to supine posture induces an inspiratory load associated with cortical activation in awake healthy subjects. Some obstructive sleep apnoea patients exhibit this cortical activity in the sitting position contributing to the arousal-dependent compensation of their upper airway abnormalities. Does a transition to the supine posture in awake obstructive sleep apnoea patients increase this cortical activity? What is the main finding and its importance? The transition to supine posture induces a reduction in the cortical activity despite evidence of an increase in genioglossus activity, suggesting that genioglossus activation is not driven by cortical activity. Abstract The anatomy and mechanical properties of the upper airway (UA) depend on posture. Lying in a supine position causes cephalad fluid shift to the neck, thus narrowing the UA and predisposing the individual to obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). Increased UA dilator muscle activity during wakefulness prevents the UA collapse but the underlying mechanism has not yet been elucidated. In the sitting position during wakefulness, some OSA patients exhibit preinspiratory cortical activity (preinspiratory potential, PIP) probably related to UA abnormalities. The aim of this study was to investigate changes in the preinspiratory cortical activity and UA dilator muscle in OSA patients during postural challenge. An electroencephalogram was used to detect PIP, and the genioglossus electromyographic activity and ventilation were analysed in 17 awake, male OSA patients while they were sitting, just after lying down, and then in response to leg positive pressure to enhance cephalad fluid shift. The prevalence of PIP decreased from 53% (sitting) to 12% (supine) (P = 0.002) in association with increased genioglossus activity (tonic from median (25th, 75th centiles) 2.3 (1.8, 2.8)% to 3.6 (1.7, 5.0)% of voluntary deglutition, P = 0.019; phasic from 2.3 (1.9, 2.8)% to 3.7 (2.0, 6.1)%, P = 0.024), and with increased transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure (from 43.0 (42.4, 44.2) to 44.6 (43.5, 45.2) mmHg). No change was observed during leg-positive-pressure application. Moving from the sitting position to the supine position reduces respiratory-related premotor cortical activity in awake OSA patients. The concomitant increase in genioglossus activity, therefore, is not driven by cortical respiratory activity.

Introduction Both types of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), obstructive and central sleep apnoea (OSA and CSA, respectively), are common in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In such patients, SDB is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality but it remains uncertain whether treating SDB by adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) in such patients reduces morbidity and mortality. Aim ADVENT-HF is designed to assess the effects of treating SDB with ASV on morbidity and mortality in patients with HFrEF. Methods ADVENT-HF is a multicentre, multinational, randomized, parallel-group, open-label trial with blinded assessment of endpoints of standard medical therapy for HFrEF alone vs. with the addition of ASV in patients with HFrEF and SDB. Patients with a history of HFrEF undergo echocardiography and polysomnography. Those with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45% and SDB (apnoea–hypopnoea index ≥15) are eligible. SDB is stratified into OSA with ≥50% of events obstructive or CSA with >50% of events central. Those with OSA must not have excessive daytime sleepiness (Epworth score of ≤10). Patients are then randomized to receive or not receive ASV. The primary outcome is the composite of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular hospital admissions, new-onset atrial fibrillation requiring anti-coagulation but not hospitalization, and delivery of an appropriate discharge from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator not resulting in hospitalization during a maximum follow-up time of 5 years. Conclusion The ADVENT-HF trial will help to determine whether treating SDB by ASV in patients with HFrEF improves morbidity and mortality.

Summary Aim: Obstructive sleep apnoeas generate an intense afferent traffic leading to arousal and apnoea termination. Yet a decrease in the sensitivity of the afferents has been described in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea, and could be a determinant of disease severity. How mechanical changes within the respiratory system are processed in the brain can be studied through the analysis of airway occlusion-related respiratory-related evoked potentials. Respiratory-related evoked potentials have been found altered during sleep in mild and moderate obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, with contradictory results during wake. We hypothesized that respiratory-related evoked potentials’ alterations during wake, if indeed a feature of the obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome, should be present in untreated severe patients. Methods: Ten untreated patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and eight matched controls were studied. Respiratory-related evoked potentials were recorded in Cz-C3 and Cz-C4, and described in terms of the amplitudes and latencies of their components P1, N1, P2 and N2. Results: Components amplitudes were similar in both groups. There was no significant difference in P1 latencies. This was also the case for N1 in Cz-C3. In contrast, N1 latencies in Cz-C4 were significantly longer in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome [median 98 ms (interquartile range 16·00) versus 79·5 ms (5·98), P = 0·015]. P2 and N2 were also significantly delayed, on both sides. Conclusions: The cortical processing of airway occlusion-related afferents seems abnormal in untreated patients with severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. This could be either a severity marker and/or an aggravating factor.

Faced with mechanical inspiratory loading, awake animals and anaesthetized humans develop alveolar hypoventilation, whereas awake humans do defend ventilation. This points to a suprapontine compensatory mechanism instead of or in addition to the ‘traditional’ brainstem respiratory regulation. This study assesses the role of the cortical pre-motor representation of inspiratory muscles in this behaviour. Ten healthy subjects (age 19–34 years, three men) were studied during quiet breathing, CO2-stimulated breathing, inspiratory resistive loading, inspiratory threshold loading, and during self-paced voluntary sniffs. Pre-triggered ensemble averaging of Cz EEG epochs starting 2.5 s before the onset of inspiration was used to look for pre-motor activity. Pre-motor potentials were present during voluntary sniffs in all subjects (average latency (±s.d.): 1325 ± 521 ms), but also during inspiratory threshold loading (1427 ± 537 ms) and during inspiratory resistive loading (1109 ± 465 ms). Pre-motor potentials were systematically followed by motor potentials during inspiratory loading. Pre-motor potentials were lacking during quiet breathing (except in one case) and during CO2-stimulated breathing (except in two cases). The same pattern was observed during repeated experiments at an interval of several weeks in a subset of three subjects. The behavioural component of inspiratory loading compensation in awake humans could thus depend on higher cortical motor areas. Demonstrating a similar role of the cerebral cortex in the compensation of disease-related inspiratory loads (e.g. asthma attacks) would have important pathophysiological implications: it could for example contribute to explain why sleep is both altered and deleterious in such situations.