1. Clinical Impact of Baseline Frailty Status and Residual Mitral Regurgitation After Transcatheter Edge‐to‐Edge Repair: Insights From the OCEAN‐Mitral Registry
- Author
-
Takahiro Tokuda, Masanori Yamamoto, Ai Kagase, Testuro Shimura, Ryo Yamaguchi, Mike Saji, Masahiko Asami, Yusuke Enta, Masaki Nakashima, Shinichi Shirai, Masaki Izumo, Shingo Mizuno, Yusuke Watanabe, Makoto Amaki, Kazuhisa Kodama, Junichi Yamaguchi, Yoshifumi Nakajima, Toru Naganuma, Hiroki Bota, Yohei Ohno, Masahiro Yamawaki, Hiroshi Ueno, Kazuki Mizutani, Toshiaki Otsuka, Shunsuke Kubo, and Kentaro Hayashida
- Subjects
Clinical Frailty Scale ,residual mitral regurgitation ,risk stratification ,transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
Background The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a useful frailty marker for predicting clinical outcomes in patients undergoing invasive therapy. However, the clinical impact of CFS after transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the association between the baseline frail status defined by the CFS and clinical outcomes with or without postprocedural MR ≥2+ (post‐MR ≥2+) after transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair. Methods and Results Based on a Japanese multicenter registry (OCEAN [Optimized Catheter Valvular Intervention]‐Mitral), data from 2078 patients with MR who underwent transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair were analyzed. The patients were classified into 5 groups: CFS 1 to 3, 4, 5, 6, and ≥7. The procedural and clinical outcomes and post‐MR ≥2+ were compared among the groups. All‐cause mortality for up to 2 years was explored using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Although the rates of acute procedural success and post‐MR ≥2+ were similar, all‐cause mortality at 2 years was significantly increased across the 5 CFS categories (15.5%, 23.8%, 27.7%, 34.6%, and 48.8%, respectively, P
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF