Search

BACKGROUND Recently, there has been an increase in the number of hepatitis A outbreaks in the United States. Although the presence of hepatitis A virus (HAV) RNA in blood donors is known to be low, HAV antibody prevalence in this population is unknown. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS Samples from 5001 US blood donors collected primarily in the midwestern United States in 2015 were tested for the presence of HAV IgG antibodies using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassays on the ARCHITECT platform (Abbott Laboratories). RESULTS The overall prevalence of IgG anti-HAV was 60%. Only one specimen was IgM anti-HAV positive, for an incidence of 0.02%. IgG anti-HAV prevalence among donors aged 16 to 19 years was 67%, decreased to 54% among donors aged 40 to 49 years and increased to 70% among donors aged 80 to 93 years. No differences were seen by sex with overall IgG anti-HAV prevalence of 61% and 60% for males and females, respectively. Among the five states (Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, and Missouri) with the highest number of donors tested, IgG anti-HAV prevalence in Missouri (65%) was significantly higher (p

Hepatitis E is a major public health problem in developing countries and is increasingly being recognized as a cause of substantial sporadic viral hepatitis infections in industrialized countries. Variable rates of hepatitis E seroprevalence have been reported from the same geographic regions depending on the assay used. In this study, we evaluated the performance characteristics of four assays which included two commercial assays, Wantai HEV-IgG ELISA kit (Wantai, China), and DS-EIA-ANTI-HEV-G kit (DSI, Italy), one NIH-developed immunoassay (NIH-55 K, Kuniholm et al. [2009] Journal of Infectious Diseases 200:48-56), previously used in several major seroprevalence studies and one in-house Western blot assay (CDC-WB). The limit of detection of IgG anti-HEV is 100 mIU/mL for Wantai assay, 200 mIU/mL for CDC-WB assay, 1000 mIU/mL for DSI assay, and 40 mIU/mL for NIH-55 K assay. Pairwise concordance between the four assays ranged from 56% to 87%. The concordance among all four assays was observed in 52% of the samples, while the concordance among three assays was observed in 37% of the samples. These data show a wide discordance between various IgG anti-HEV assays and warrant a comprehensive evaluation of all the assays using well characterized global serum reference panels.