Search

Abstract FAM111A gene mutations cause Kenney–Caffey syndrome (KCS) and Osteocraniostenosis (OCS), conditions characterized by short stature, low serum ionized calcium (Ca2+), low parathyroid hormone (PTH), and bony abnormalities. The molecular mechanism mediating this phenotype is unknown. The c‐terminal domain of FAM111A harbors all the known disease‐causing variations and encodes a domain with high homology to serine proteases. However, whether this serine protease domain contributes to the maintenance of Ca2+ homeostasis is not known. We hypothesized the disruption of the serine protease domain of FAM111A would disrupt Ca2+ homeostasis. To test this hypothesis, we generated with CRISPR/Cas9, mice with a frameshift insertion (c.1450insA) or large deletion (c.1253‐1464del) mutation in the Fam111a serine protease domain. Serum‐ionized Ca2+ and PTH levels were not significantly different between wild type, heterozygous, or homozygous Fam111a mutant mice. Additionally, there were no significant differences in fecal or urine Ca2+ excretion, intestinal Ca2+ absorption or overall Ca2+ balance. Only female homozygous (c.1450insA), but not heterozygous mice displayed differences in bone microarchitecture and mineral density compared to wild‐type animals. We conclude that frameshift mutations that disrupt the c‐terminal serine protease domain do not induce a KCS or OCS phenotype in mice nor alter Ca2+ homeostasis.

Duration of response (DOR) and time to response (TTR) are typically evaluated as secondary endpoints in early-stage clinical studies in oncology when efficacy is assessed by the best overall response and presented as the overall response rate. Despite common use of DOR and TTR in particular in single-arm studies, the definition of these endpoints and the questions they are intended to answer remain unclear. Motivated by the estimand framework, we present relevant scientific questions of interest for DOR and TTR and propose corresponding estimand definitions. We elaborate on how to deal with relevant intercurrent events which should follow the same considerations as implemented for the primary response estimand. A case study in mantle cell lymphoma illustrates the implementation of relevant estimands of DOR and TTR. We close the paper with practical recommendations to implement DOR and TTR in clinical study protocols., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)