Search

Your search keyword '"Tolisano, Anthony M."' showing total 30 results
Start Over Author "Tolisano, Anthony M." Publisher wiley
30 results on '"Tolisano, Anthony M."'

3. Layperson Perception of Reflux‐Related Symptoms

Author

Fischer, Jakob L., primary, Tolisano, Anthony M., additional, Navarro, Alvaro I., additional, Trinh, Lily, additional, Abuzeid, Waleed M., additional, Humphreys, Ian M., additional, Akbar, Nadeem A., additional, Shah, Sharan, additional, Schneider, John S., additional, Riley, Charles A., additional, and McCoul, Edward D., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. What do we mean when we have a “sinus infection?”

Author

Riley, Charles A., primary, Navarro, Alvaro I., additional, Trinh, Lily, additional, Abuzeid, Waleed M., additional, Humphreys, Ian M., additional, Akbar, Nadeem A., additional, Shah, Sharan, additional, Lee, Jivianne T., additional, Wu, Tara, additional, Schneider, John S., additional, Tolisano, Anthony M., additional, and McCoul, Edward D., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

29. Her Legacy Lives On: Celebrating the Women Behind Head and Neck Eponyms.

Author

Mosteller LJ, Yang AW, and Tolisano AM

Abstract

This article profiles 6 notable female scientists who have had eponyms named after them, highlighting their significant contributions to various medical fields and whose scientific endeavors have influenced our practice and understanding of otolaryngology. We discuss Łucja Frey Gottesman and her description of Frey's syndrome; Margaret Dix and the Dix-Hallpike test; Lotte Strauss and her work defining Churg-Strauss disease; Dorothy Reed Mendenhall's discovery of Reed-Sternberg cells in Hodgkin's lymphoma; Edith Louise Potter defining Potter sequence in utero; Denise Louis-Bar originally characterizing the condition now known as ataxia-telangiectasia or Louis-Bar syndrome. Despite the challenges these women faced as pioneering female physicians as well as personal and political turmoil, their contributions greatly advanced the fields of otolaryngology, neurology, neuropathology, perinatology, and pediatric pathology. We aim to honor their stories and medical legacies., (Published 2024. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.)

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

30. Author Self-Citation in the Otolaryngology Literature: A Pilot Study.

Author

Tolisano AM, Song SA, and Cable BB

Subjects
Humans, Journalism, Medical, Pilot Projects, Retrospective Studies, Authorship, Journal Impact Factor, Otolaryngology, Periodicals as Topic
Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of author self-citation in the field of otolaryngology., Study Design and Setting: A retrospective review of bibliographic references in 5 otolaryngology journals., Subjects and Methods: Five high-impact otolaryngology journals were reviewed over a 3-month period between January and March 2014 to identify the pattern of author self-citations. Data included study type, otolaryngology topic, authorship, total citations, author self-citations, and country of origin., Results: Nearly two-thirds of articles contained at least 1 self-citation, with an average of 2.6 self-citations per article. Self-citations represented nearly 10% of total citations. Articles with at least 1 self-citation had more authors (5.8 vs 4.9, P < .01) and more citations (30.4 vs 22.2, P < .01) per article than did those without self-citations. There was no difference in self-citation practices between articles originating within the United States and abroad (P = .65). Last authors were the most frequent self-citers and were more likely than lead authors to cite themselves (P < .01). Original reports contained the highest percentage of self-citations per article as compared with reviews and case reports (P < .01)., Conclusion: Author self-citation in the otolaryngology literature is common and compares similarly to other medical specialties previously studied. Self-citation should not be considered inappropriate, as it is often done to expand on earlier research. Nevertheless, editors, researchers, and readers should be aware of this increasingly recognized phenomenon and its associated potential implications to the process of scientific inquiry., (© American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.)

Published
2016
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results