Search

Background The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of obesity and the usefulness of a preoperative weight loss program (PWLP) for obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection (LCR). Methods Study 1: 392 patients who underwent LCR for colorectal cancer were divided into two groups: those with a body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 (n = 113) and those with a BMI, This article indicated that preoperative weight loss program for obese patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection was important. Our program is so useful for obese patients with colorectal cancer.

Situs inversus totalis (SIT) refers to an inverted position of the major visceral organ as a "mirror image" of the regular location. We present a video of a robotic-assisted total gastrectomy in a 84-year-old man with SIT. The patient was diagnosed with advanced gastric cancer in the U region. The port placement was done as mirror images of our usual settings. Lymph node dissection was performed with a completely reverse approach to the usual procedure. After total gastrectomy, an intracorporal esophagojejunostomy was performed by circular method. All procedures were performed safely with no intraoperative complications and the patient was discharged uneventfully. Pathological diagnosis confirmed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma and the depth of invasion was to the subserosa; there were five metastatic lymph nodes. In patients who have gastric cancer with SIT, a robotic-assisted total gastrectomy can be performed safely without surgical complication. Robots are useful for performing a total gastrectomy in SIT.

Aim Pancreatectomy causes both hyperglycemia, secondary to surgical stress, and pancreatic diabetes, which leads to difficult‐to‐control postoperative blood glucose levels. We investigated whether using an artificial pancreas perioperatively to provide appropriate blood glucose control could reduce postoperative complications following pancreatectomy. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 52 patients who underwent pancreatectomy at Tokushima University Hospital from 2015 to 2019. The most recent 26/52 patients received perioperative blood glucose control using an artificial pancreas. Postoperative blood glucose control with manual insulin injections based on a sliding scale was performed in the earlier 26 patients (controls). We compared surgical outcomes between the artificial pancreas group and the control group. Results There was no significant difference in patients' white blood cell or neutrophil counts, prognostic nutritional index, neutrophil‐lymphocyte ratio, and C‐reactive protein‐to‐albumin ratio on postoperative day 1; however, lymphocyte counts were higher in the artificial pancreas group. The number of serious complications of Clavien‐Dindo grade >IIIa was significantly lower in the artificial pancreas group (P, Using an artificial pancreas for perioperative blood glucose control in patients undergoing pancreatectomy decreased the number of serious complications through proper management of blood glucose levels without hypoglycemia, and may influence peripheral lymphocytes.

Aim The purposes of this study are to present cases of emergency surgery in which gastrointestinal perforation occurred during bevacizumab administration, consider the indications for emergency surgery, and examine the safety of scheduled surgery after a washout period for bevacizumab. Methods (a) We retrospectively investigated seven patients who underwent emergency surgery for bevacizumab‐associated intestinal perforation. (b) We investigated 104 patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy who underwent surgery from 2008 to 2018, retrospectively. Results (a) In the seven patients undergoing emergency surgery for gastrointestinal perforation, the median bevacizumab administration and washout periods were 16 weeks and 24 days, respectively. A stoma was created in all patients except in those who were not candidates. Two patients developed postoperative abdominal abscesses, and two patients died from perioperative sepsis and gastrointestinal bleeding, respectively; both of these patients had poor performance status. (b) In patients receiving bevacizumab (n = 45) and patients treated with bevacizumab‐free regimens as neoadjuvant therapy (n = 59), 31 and 52 patients received chemoradiotherapy, respectively. We found no correlation with postoperative complications with or without bevacizumab. Conclusion The surgical indications should be considered carefully in patients with gastrointestinal perforation secondary to bevacizumab administration. Meanwhile, after appropriate cessation time, scheduled surgery following bevacizumab administration is feasible., In planned surgery, anastomosis after appropriate cessation time of bevacizumab may be acceptable. Surgical indication should be carefully considered in severe perforated cases during bevacizumab administration.