1. Mutation as a Toxicological Endpoint for Regulatory Decision‐Making
- Author
-
Andreas Zeller, Paul D. White, Francesco Marchetti, Kristine L. Witt, George E. Johnson, B. Bhaskar Gollapudi, Robert H. Heflich, and George R. Douglas
- Subjects
Epidemiology ,Somatic cell ,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis ,Mutagen ,010501 environmental sciences ,medicine.disease_cause ,Bioinformatics ,Risk Assessment ,01 natural sciences ,Toxicological risk ,03 medical and health sciences ,medicine ,Animals ,Humans ,Genetics (clinical) ,030304 developmental biology ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences ,0303 health sciences ,Mutagenicity Tests ,business.industry ,fungi ,High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing ,Germ Cells ,Somatic mosaicism ,Mutation ,Mutation (genetic algorithm) ,Carcinogens ,Point of departure ,business ,Risk assessment ,Germ cell mutation ,Mutagens - Abstract
Mutations induced in somatic cells and germ cells are responsible for a variety of human diseases, and mutation per se has been considered an adverse health concern since the early part of the 20th Century. Although in vitro and in vivo somatic cell mutation data are most commonly used by regulatory agencies for hazard identification, that is, determining whether or not a substance is a potential mutagen and carcinogen, quantitative mutagenicity dose-response data are being used increasingly for risk assessments. Efforts are currently underway to both improve the measurement of mutations and to refine the computational methods used for evaluating mutation data. We recommend continuing the development of these approaches with the objective of establishing consensus regarding the value of including the quantitative analysis of mutation per se as a required endpoint for comprehensive assessments of toxicological risk. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 61:34-41, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF