1. Oleoylethanolamide‐induced anorexia in rats is associated with locomotor impairment
- Author
-
Myrtha Arnold, Abdelhak Mansouri, Jean-Philippe Krieger, Urs Meyer, Bernd T. Wolfstädter, Shahana Fedele, Wolfgang Langhans, University of Zurich, and Mansouri, Abdelhak
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Male ,food intake ,Physiology ,Oleic Acids ,Signalling Pathways ,Rats, Sprague-Dawley ,Oleoylethanolamide ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Eating ,0302 clinical medicine ,2737 Physiology (medical) ,Original Research ,2. Zero hunger ,Vagus Nerve ,Anorexia ,side effects ,medicine.symptom ,Locomotion ,medicine.drug ,Agonist ,medicine.medical_specialty ,medicine.drug_class ,Alpha (ethology) ,03 medical and health sciences ,Quinpirole ,Dopamine receptor D3 ,Physiology (medical) ,Internal medicine ,Dopamine receptor D2 ,medicine ,Animals ,Behavior ,business.industry ,intestinal innervation ,10079 Institute of Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology ,1314 Physiology ,Rats ,Gastrointestinal Tract ,030104 developmental biology ,Endocrinology ,chemistry ,Food intake ,Intestinal innervation ,Locomotor activity ,Side effects ,Anorectic ,570 Life sciences ,biology ,business ,locomotor activity ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Endocannabinoids ,Neuroscience - Abstract
The endogenous peroxisome proliferator‐activated receptor alpha (PPAR‐α) agonist Oleoylethanolamide (OEA) inhibits eating in rodents, mainly by delaying the onset of meals. The underlying mechanisms of OEA‐induced anorexia, however, remain unclear. Animals treated with high OEA doses were shown to display signs of discomfort and impaired locomotion. Therefore, we first examined whether the impaired locomotion may contribute to OEA's anorectic effect. Second, it is controversial whether abdominal vagal afferents are necessary for OEA's anorectic effect. Thus, we explored alternative peripheral neural pathways mediating IP OEA's anorectic effect by performing a celiac‐superior mesenteric ganglionectomy (CGX) or a subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation (SDA) alone or in combination. Exogenously administered OEA at a commonly used dose (10 mg/kg BW, IP) concurrently reduced food intake and compromised locomotor activity. Attempts to dissociate both phenomena using the dopamine D2/D3 receptor agonist Quinpirole (1 mg/kg BW, SC) failed because Quinpirole antagonized both, OEA‐induced locomotor impairment and delay in eating onset. CGX attenuated the prolongation of the latency to eat by IP OEA, but neither SDA nor CGX prevented IP OEA‐induced locomotor impairment. Our results indicate that IP OEA's anorectic effect may be secondary to impaired locomotion rather than due to physiological satiety. They further confirm that vagal afferents do not mediate exogenous OEA's anorectic effects, but suggest a role for spinal afferents in addition to an alternative, nonneuronal signaling route. ISSN:2051-817X
- Published
- 2018