Search

Background: De-intensified treatment strategies for early human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharynx cancer (OPC) rely on selecting patients with an excellent prognosis. The criterion for enrollment in current de-intensification trials is ≤10 pack-years. More nuance to the pack-year criteria may expand enrollment, improve patient outcomes, and prevent overtreatment. It was hypothesized that patients with more than 10 pack-years may experience favorable outcomes if smoking cessation has been achieved., Methods: From an institutional review board-approved database, patients with HPV+ oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma treated definitively with radiation with or without chemotherapy were retrospectively identified. Patients with a history of smoking who were eligible for national de-intensification trials were included (cT1-2N1-2b or T3N0-2b [American Joint Committee on Cancer, seventh edition]). Cox regression with penalized smoothing splines was used to evaluate nonlinear effects of cessation. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to objectively search for relationships between the 2 colinear variables (pack-years and time since cessation)., Results: Among 330 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 130 (40%) were never smokers, 139 (42%) were former smokers, and 61 (18%) were current smokers. With standard therapy, all former smokers achieved a progression-free survival (PFS) rate higher than 91%, regardless of pack-year exposure. Nonlinear Cox regression demonstrated that more recent cessation was associated with significantly worse PFS even among those with ≤20 pack-years. RPA demonstrated that only current smokers experienced a 2-year PFS rate lower than 91%; former smokers, regardless of pack-years, experienced a 2-year PFS rate higher than 91%., Conclusions: The 10-pack-year rule may not apply to all early HPV+ OPCs, particularly for former smokers. Future randomized de-intensification trials should consider a broader and more nuanced approach until the predictive role of smoking status is established., (© 2020 American Cancer Society.)

Salvage mastectomy (SM) is the standard of care for patients with local recurrence (LR) after breast conservation therapy (BCT), often with immediate reconstruction. Complications of reconstruction are a concern for these patients, and long-term data are limited. We sought to compare rates of complications requiring re-operation (CRR) and reconstruction failure (RF) between autologous reconstruction (AR) and tissue expander/implant reconstruction (TE/I). Patients with locally recurrent breast cancer after BCT, treated with SM and immediate AR or TE/I between 2000 and 2008, were identified. CRR was defined as unplanned return to operating room for wound infection, dehiscence, necrosis (including flap, skin, or fat), hematoma, or hernia (for AR) and extrusion, leak, or capsular contracture (for TE/I). RF was defined as conversion to another reconstruction technique or to flat chest wall. This study included 103 patients with 107 reconstructions. Median follow-up was 6.6 years. CRR and RF were significantly higher with TE/I (n = 34) compared to AR (n = 73) at 5 years (50.9% vs 25.5%; P = 0.02) and (42.1% vs 5.8%; P < 0.001). On univariate analysis (UVA), TE/I (HR = 2.14; P = 0.02) and diabetes (HR = 5.10; P = 0.007) were significant predictors for CRR. On UVA, TE/I (HR = 7.30; P < 0.001) and older age at reconstruction (HR = 1.03; P = 0.003) were significant predictors for RF. In this population of previously irradiated patients, TE/I was associated with significantly higher CRR and RF. Complications continue to occur up to 10 years after TE/I. AR should be considered in appropriately selected patients, though TE/I may remain a reasonable option in patients without high-risk factors for surgical complications., (© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)