Search

Background Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), characterized by progressive left ventricular enlargement and systolic dysfunction, is the most common type of cardiomyopathy and a leading cause of heart failure and cardiac death. Accumulating evidence underscores the critical role of genetic defects in the pathogenesis of DCM, and >250 genes have been implicated in DCM to date. However, DCM is of substantial genetic heterogeneity, and the genetic basis underpinning DCM remains elusive in most cases. Methods and Results By genome‐wide scan with microsatellite markers and genetic linkage analysis in a 4‐generation family inflicted with autosomal‐dominant DCM, a new locus for DCM was mapped on chromosome 15q13.1–q13.3, a 4.77‐cM (≈3.43 Mbp) interval between markers D15S1019 and D15S1010, with the largest 2‐point logarithm of odds score of 5.1175 for the marker D15S165 at recombination fraction (θ)=0.00. Whole‐exome sequencing analyses revealed that within the mapping chromosomal region, only the mutation in the KLF13 gene, c.430G>T (p.E144X), cosegregated with DCM in the family. In addition, sequencing analyses of KLF13 in another cohort of 266 unrelated patients with DCM and their available family members unveiled 2 new mutations, c.580G>T (p.E194X) and c.595T>C (p.C199R), which cosegregated with DCM in 2 families, respectively. The 3 mutations were absent from 418 healthy subjects. Functional assays demonstrated that the 3 mutants had no transactivation on the target genes ACTC1 and MYH7 (2 genes causally linked to DCM), alone or together with GATA4 (another gene contributing to DCM), and a diminished ability to bind the promoters of ACTC1 and MYH7. Add, the E144X‐mutant KLF13 showed a defect in intracellular distribution. Conclusions This investigation indicates KLF13 as a new gene predisposing to DCM, which adds novel insight to the molecular pathogenesis underlying DCM, implying potential implications for prenatal prevention and precision treatment of DCM in a subset of patients.

Synthetic biology circuits are often constructed with multiple gene expression units assembled in close proximity, and they can be used to perform complex functions in embryonic stem cells (ESCs). However, mutual interference between transcriptional units has not been well studied in mouse ESCs. To assess the efficiency of insulators at suppressing promoter interference in mouse ESCs, we used an evaluation scheme in which a tunable tetracycline response element promoter is connected to a constant Nanog promoter. The chicken hypersensitive site 4 (cHS4) insulator, widely used both for enhancer blocking and for barrier insulation in vitro and in vivo, was positioned between the two expression units for assessment. By inserting the cassette into various loci of the mouse ESC genome with PiggyBac transposon, we were able to quantitatively examine the protective effect of cHS4 by gradually increasing the transcriptional activity of the tetracycline response element promoter with doxycycline and then measuring the transcriptional activity of the Nanog promoter. Our results indicate that the cHS4 insulator has minimal insulating effects on promoter interference in mouse ESCs. Further studies show that the cHS4 insulation effect may be promoter specific and related to interaction with CCCTC‐binding factor‐mediated loop formation. In addition, we also compared DNA transposition and transgene expression with or without the cHS4 insulator using well‐established ESC reporters. The results indicate that cHS4 has no apparent effects on DNA transposition and transgene expression levels, but exerts modest protective effects on long‐term transgene silencing.

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of clinical cardiac dysrhythmia responsible for thromboembolic cerebral stroke, congestive heart failure, and death. Aggregating evidence highlights the strong genetic basis of AF. Nevertheless, AF is of pronounced genetic heterogeneity, and in an overwhelming majority of patients, the genetic determinants underpinning AF remain elusive. Methods and Results By genome‐wide screening with polymorphic microsatellite markers and linkage analysis in a 4‐generation Chinese family affected with autosomal‐dominant AF, a novel locus for AF was mapped to chromosome 1q24.2–q25.1, a 3.20‐cM (≈4.19 Mbp) interval between markers D1S2851 and D1S218, with the greatest 2‐point logarithm of odds score of 4.8165 for the marker D1S452 at recombination fraction=0.00. Whole‐exome sequencing and bioinformatics analyses showed that within the mapping region, only the mutation in the paired related homeobox 1 (PRRX1) gene, NM_022716.4:c.319C>T;(p.Gln107*), cosegregated with AF in the family. In addition, sequencing analyses of PRRX1 in another cohort of 225 unrelated patients with AF revealed a new mutation, NM_022716.4:c.437G>T; (p.Arg146Ile), in a patient. The 2 mutations were absent in 908 control subjects. Biological analyses in HeLa cells demonstrated that the 2 mutants had significantly diminished transactivation on the target genes ISL1 and SHOX2 and markedly decreased ability to bind the promoters of ISL1 and SHOX2 (2 genes causally linked to AF), although with normal intracellular distribution. Conclusions This study first indicates that PRRX1 loss‐of‐function mutations predispose to AF, which provides novel insight into the molecular pathogenesis underpinning AF, implying potential implications for precisive prophylaxis and management of AF.