Search

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk is lower in females than males. It has been reported that females have greater pancreatic 훽‐cell function than males, which may at least in part contribute to the T2D risk in females. 훽‐cell function is influenced by exercise training; however, previous trials comparing 훽‐cell function between the sexes have not included participants matched for training status. Furthermore, the acute effects of different modes of exercise on 훽‐cell function, and whether sex inherently influences these effects, are largely unexamined. Males and females (12/sex) completed a 120‐min oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at rest (CON) and following acute bouts of high‐intensity interval exercise (HIIE), moderate intensity continuous (MIC) exercise, and low‐load high‐repetition (LLHR) resistance exercise to assess whether sex inherently influences baseline and/or post‐exercise pancreatic function in the absence of pathology. We found no sex differences in basal pancreatic 훽‐cell function. Females had greater basal insulin clearance following MIC exercise compared to males (p = 0.01) and males tended to have a higher potentiation ratio following HIIE (p = 0.07). Females also had lower glucose sensitivity following MIC exercise compared to HIIE (p = 0.007) and LLHR (p = 0.003). Insulin clearance during the OGTT was greater following HIIE as compared with CON and MIC exercise (p = 0.02). 2‐H oral glucose insulin sensitivity was greater following LLHR compared to CON (p = 0.01). Acute bouts of different modes of exercise do not differentially influence 훽‐cell function but do influence insulin clearance and insulin sensitivity. Therefore, sex and exercise mode interact to differentially influence insulin clearance and glucose sensitivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Recent clinical studies have shown enhanced brain glucose uptake during clamp and brain fatty acid uptake in insulin‐resistant individuals. Preclinical studies suggest that the brain may be involved in the control of insulin secretion. The aim of this study was to investigate whether brain metabolism assessed as brain glucose and fatty acid uptake is associated with the parameters of β‐cell function in humans. Materials and methods: We analysed cross‐sectional data of 120 subjects across a wide range of BMI and insulin sensitivity. Brain glucose uptake (BGU) was measured during euglycaemic‐hyperinsulinaemic clamp (n = 67) and/or during fasting (n = 45) using [18F]‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). In another group of subjects (n = 34), brain fatty acid uptake was measured using [18F]‐fluoro‐6‐thia‐heptadecanoic acid (FTHA) PET during fasting. The parameters of β‐cell function were derived from OGTT modelling. Statistical analysis was performed with whole‐brain voxel‐based statistical parametric mapping. Results: In non‐diabetics, BGU during euglycaemic hyperinsulinaemic clamp correlated positively with basal insulin secretion rate (r = 0.51, P =.0008) and total insulin output (r = 0.51, P =.0008), whereas no correlation was found in type 2 diabetics. BGU during clamp correlated positively with potentiation in non‐diabetics (r = 0.33, P =.02) and negatively in type 2 diabetics (r = −0.61, P =.02). The associations in non‐diabetics were not explained with whole‐body insulin sensitivity or BMI. No correlations were found between baseline (fasting) BGU and basal insulin secretion rate, whereas baseline brain fatty acid uptake correlated directly with basal insulin secretion rate (r = 0.39, P =.02) and inversely with potentiation (r = −0.36, P =.04). Conclusions: Our study provides coherent, though correlative, evidence that, in humans, the brain may be involved in the control of insulin secretion independently of insulin sensitivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]