Search

The Luoping Biota represents of the recovery of marine ecosystems after the Permian–Triassic Mass Extinction. To better understand the palaeoenvironmental background of the Luoping Biota, sedimentary analysis and multi‐geochemical proxies (Mo, U, V, V/Cr, MoEF, UEF, and VEF) were assessed in Member II of the Middle Triassic Guanling Formation of the Xiangdongpo section in Luoping County, Yunnan Province. According to the facies characteristics and redox‐sensitive elemental proxies, in combination with macrofossil and bioturbation evidence, five intervals (I, II, III, IV, and V) were recognized. The exceptional preservation of the fossils is related to two anoxic intervals (II and IV) sandwiched by three suboxic intervals (I, III, and V). Based on this study and regional correlation, it is concluded that anoxia in the water‐column increased the preservation potential of macrofauna fossils and inhibited the survival of trace‐making organisms. In addition, microbial mats could produce local anoxic and restricted micro‐environments, preventing the disarticulation of the carcasses by water turbulence. Therefore, we demonstrate that anoxic conditions played a key role in the exceptional fossil preservation of the Luoping Biota. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We reconstruct the apparatus architecture of the gondollelid conodont Nicoraella kockeli based on fused clusters from the early Middle Triassic (middle Anisian, Pelsonian) of Luoping County, east Yunnan Province, south‐west China. This material was characterized non‐invasively using synchrotron x‐ray tomographic microscopy and the ensuing data analysed using computed tomography, allowing us to infer the composition, homologies and architectural arrangement of elements within the apparatus. Much of the original three‐dimensional architecture of the apparatus is preserved and our apparatus reconstruction is the best characterized of any taxon within the superfamily Gondolelloidea. This allows us to test architectural models for gondolelloids and prioniodinins, more generally, as well as the functional interpretations based upon them. In particular, we reject a recent functional interpretation of the conodont feeding apparatus which was based on a biomechanically‐optimized inference of apparatus architecture in a close gondolelloid relative of Nicoraella. Nevertheless, our architectural model provides a foundation for future functional interpretations of gondolleloids and prioniodinins, more generally. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]