Search

ABSTRACT While individual studies from several South American countries have shown driving while intoxicated to be a problem, there are no objective systematically collected alcohol-associated driving data obtained in most South American countries. This limits their ability to implement and enforce targeted prevention strategies, evaluate whether proven prevention efforts from North America (particularly the United States and Canada) can be transferred to the South, and to sustain momentum for the improvement of road safety by demonstrating that previously implemented legal and policy changes are effective. The aim of this paper is to discuss the abysmal differences that exist between northern and southern American countries regarding the current status of driving while intoxicated prevention strategies-their implementation, impacts and effects-using Brazil as a case example. We propose a three-pronged approach to close this northern-southern American gap in driving while intoxicated prevention and intervention: (a) systematic collection on road traffic crash/injury/death as well as risk factor data, (b) passage of laws without loopholes requiring compliance with blood alcohol concentration testing and (c) provision of appropriate training and equipment to the police in concomitance with vigilant enforcement. Resources and energies must be put towards data collection, implementation of prevention strategies and enforcement in order to decrease the unacceptably high rates of these preventable driving while intoxicated deaths. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The author comments on the paper "Why don't northern American solutions to drinking and driving work in southern America?" by F. Pechansky and A. Chandran, which addresses the lack of policies regarding drinking and driving. According to her, lack of data or laws is not a problem in Brazil but lapses in the enforcement of existing laws is. She refers to several studies on drunk driving and suggests acquiring a better understanding of the problem through research and monitoring.

The author comments on "Why don't northern American solutions to drinking and driving work in southern America?" by F. Pechansky and A. Chandran about the status of control and prevention of driving while intoxicated (DWI) in Brazil. Although he agrees with the study, he highlights that Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) group of victims of DWI has been an extreme force for change in U.S. cultural views on DWI. He also mentions the importance of working with communities and advocacy groups.

The author comments on the article "Why don't northern American solutions to drinking and driving work in southern America?" by F. Pechansky and A. Chandran. She highlights the points addressed by the authors of the study regarding aspects lacking in Brazil and notes that the issue of advocacy and active popular support is not taken into consideration by the study. She opines that active participation as a critical factor to tackle the state of affairs of drinking and driving rates.