Search

Activation of biomass burning aerosols (BBA) and fossil fuel combustion aerosols (FFA) in fogs and clouds significantly impact regional air quality through aqueous chemistry and climate by affecting cloud microphysics. However, we lack direct observations of how these aerosols behave in fogs and clouds. Using a newly developed aerosol‐cloud sampling system, we conducted observations during fog events and found that BBA, despite their high organic content, effectively contributed to super‐micron interstitial aerosols and fog droplets in low supersaturation fogs. In contrast, FFA, predominantly externally mixed organic, did not grow beyond the super‐micron size in fogs due to their near‐hydrophobic nature. Measurements conducted under supersaturations relevant for cloud formation revealed that portions of FFA could serve as cloud condensation nuclei, but only when supersaturation exceeded ∼0.14%. These findings have broad implications for future investigations into the influence of BBA and FFA on fog and cloud chemistry and their interactions with clouds. Plain Language Summary: Tiny particles, known as aerosols, emitted from combustion of biomass and fossil fuels, can impact air quality and global climate by interacting with fog and clouds. However, we lack direct observational evidence of how these aerosols behave in these conditions. In our study, we developed an advanced aerosol‐cloud sampling system to observe aerosol activation during fog events. Our findings highlight a crucial factor of aerosol activation: the mixing of these aerosols. Biomass burning aerosols with an internal mixture of organic and inorganic components activate more easily, even in conditions with low supersaturation like fog. In contrast, fossil fuel combustion aerosols are often externally mixed and almost water‐repellent, requiring higher supersaturation to become cloud condensation nuclei. Understanding these distinctions has significant implications for regional air quality and the intricate interactions between aerosols and clouds. By gaining insights into how various aerosols interact with fog and clouds, we can enhance our understanding of their impact on our environment and climate. Key Points: Advanced Aerosol‐Cloud sampling system was developed to characterize aerosol activation in fogsBiomass burning aerosols efficiently form fog droplets, while fossil fuel combustion aerosols are almost hydrophobic and don't contributeFossil fuel combustion organic aerosols can serve as CCN in high supersaturation conditions (>0.14%) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Submicron aerosol (PM1) species measured by aerosol mass spectrometers have been widely used to validate chemical transport models; however, the uncertainties due to chemical differences between PM1 and PM2.5 are poorly constrained. Here we characterized such differences in a highly polluted environment in north China in winter. Our results showed that the changes in PM1/PM2.5 ratios as a function of relative humidity (RH) were largely different for primary and secondary species. Secondary organic and inorganic aerosol (SOA and SIA) presented clear decreases in PM1/PM2.5 ratios at RH > 60% during periods with high SIA contributions (>50%), likely driven by the changes in aerosol hygroscopicity and phase states, while the traffic and coal combustion OA had limited dependence on RH. Thermodynamic modeling showed negligible impacts of PM differences on predictions of particle acidity, yet these impacts can cause a difference in aerosol water content by up to 50–70%. Plain Language Summary: Current air pollution studies rely largely upon aerosol mass spectrometers that provide real‐time measurements of submicron aerosol (PM1) species, and in many studies, PM1 aerosol species are used to validate those of PM2.5 in chemical transport models and estimate particle acidity and aerosol water content which are key parameters in studying heterogeneous reactions. However, the uncertainties in air pollution studies due to the chemical differences of PM1 and PM2.5 are poorly constrained, particularly in highly polluted environment, for example, China and India. We found that the changes in PM1/PM2.5 ratios as a function of relative humidity were largely different for primary and secondary aerosol species in highly polluted environment, which was likely driven by the changes in aerosol hygroscopicity and phase states. The chemical differences of PM1/PM2.5 ratios were also found to have negligible impacts on predictions of particle acidity, yet these impacts can cause a difference in aerosol water content by up to 50–70%. Considering the rapid increases in the deployments of aerosol mass spectrometers worldwide, the results in this study are of great importance for a better understanding of the uncertainties in both modelling and observations. Key Points: We observed large chemical differences between PM1 and PM2.5 under high relative humidity periods in highly polluted environmentThe RH dependence of PM1/PM2.5 ratios of primary and secondary species was largely different due to different hygroscopicityThe chemical differences between PM1 and PM2.5 have negligible influences on particle acidity prediction, yet have a large impact on AWC [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]