Search

Objectives: South Africa has made remarkable progress in increasing the coverage of antiretroviral therapy (ART) among pregnant women; however, viral suppression among pregnant women receiving ART is reported to be low. Access to routine viral load testing is crucial to identify women with unsuppressed viral load early in pregnancy and to provide timely intervention to improve viral suppression. This study aimed to determine the coverage of maternal viral load monitoring nationally, focusing on viral load testing, documentation of viral load test results, and viral suppression (viral load < 50 copies/mL). At the time of this study, the first‐line regimen for women initiating ART during pregnancy was non‐nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NNRTI)‐based regimen. Methods: Between 1 October and 15 November 2019, a cross‐sectional survey was conducted among 15‐ to 49‐year‐old pregnant women attending antenatal care in 1589 nationally representative public health facilities. Data on ART status, viral load testing and viral load test results were extracted from medical records. Logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with coverage of viral load testing. Results: Of 8112 participants eligible for viral load testing, 81.7% received viral load testing, and 94.1% of the viral load test results were documented in the medical records. Of those who had viral load test results documented, 74.1% were virally suppressed. Women initiated on ART during pregnancy and who received ART for three months had lower coverage of viral load testing (73%) and viral suppression (56.8%) compared with women initiated on ART before pregnancy (82.8% and 76.1%, respectively). Initiating ART during pregnancy rather than before pregnancy was associated with a lower likelihood of receiving a viral load test during pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio = 1.6, 95% confidence interval: 1.4–1.8). Conclusions: Viral load result documentation was high; viral load testing could be improved especially among women initiating ART during pregnancy. The low viral suppression among women who initiated ART during pregnancy despite receiving ART for three months highlights the importance of enhanced adherence counselling during pregnancy. Our finding supports the WHO recommendation that a Dolutegravir‐containing regimen be the preferred regimen for women who are newly initiating ART during pregnancy for more rapid viral suppression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The World Heart Federation (WHF) screening criteria do not incorporate a strict, reproducible definition of anterior mitral valve leaflet (AMVL) restriction. Using a novel definition, we have identified two distinct AMVL restriction configurations. The first, called "distal tip" AMVL restriction is associated with additional morphological features of rheumatic heart disease (RHD), while the second, "gradual bowing" AMVL restriction is not. This "arch‐like" leaflet configuration involves the base to tip of the medial MV in isolation. We hypothesize that this configuration is a normal variant. Methodology: The prevalence and associated leaflet configurations of AMVL restriction were assessed in schoolchildren with an established "very low" (VLP), "high" (HP), and "very high" prevalence (VHP) of RHD. Results: 936 studies were evaluated (HP 577 cases; VLP 359 cases). Sixty‐five cases of "gradual bowing" AMVL restriction were identified in the HP cohort (11.3%, 95% CI 8.9–14.1) and 35 cases (9.7%, 95% CI 7–13.2) in the VLP cohort (P =.47). In the second analyses, an enriched cohort of 43 studies with proven definite RHD were evaluated. "Distal tip" AMVL restriction was identified in all 43 VHP cases (100%) and affected the central portion of the AMVL in all cases. Conclusion: "Gradual bowing" AMVL restriction appears to be a normal, benign variant of the MV, not associated with RHD risk nor with any other morphological features of RHD. Conversely, "Distal tip" AMVL restriction was present in all cases in the VHP cohort with no cases exhibiting a straight, nonrestricted central portion of the AMVL. This novel finding requires further investigation as a potential RHD rule‐out test of the MV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]