Search

Flow maldistribution at the inlet of a heat exchanger (HX) is a significant parameter that needs to be considered to judge the performance of the same. In this paper, four arrangements of three‐fluid cross‐flow heat exchanger (3FCFHX) with different flow conditions are considered as shown in Figure 1 in which is the performance of cross‐countercurrent and cross‐cocurrent arrangements for uniform and flow maldistribution at the inlet. In addition, the effect of different inlet fluid flow models on the HX performance are investigated numerically. Among the three fluids in these arrangements, the central fluid is considered to be the hot fluid. From the principles of conservation of energy, the governing equations for three fluids are generated and solved using the finite element method. Four different inlet fluid‐flow models are considered for the analysis. Performance is judged using hot fluid effectiveness and the number of transfer units for a different range of governing parameters. The effects of inlet flow maldistribution (IFM) are measured using degradation factors. The results show that the performance of cross‐cocurrent arrangement is found to be superior to the cross‐countercurrent arrangement. In addition, the IFM enhances thermal performance. Further, it is determined that the flow maldistribution at the inlet will enhance the hot fluid effectiveness by 4%–4.5% and 1.8%–2% in cross‐cocurrent and countercurrent arrangements, respectively. The results give a thorough insight into the significant concerns involved in the design of such HXs. Application of the finite element method proves the ease of determining the exit temperatures of the fluids in the HX. This approach is indeed time‐saving and gives insights when compared to the CFD approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The main disadvantage of crossflow microfiltration processes is the occurrence of fouling, which impedes its application and economic efficiency. Unsteady crossflow, e.g., due to pulsatile or alternating operating mode, can reduce the formation of a deposit layer and therefore prevent strong flux decay and retention of solutes. With this technique, especially processes run at low crossflow velocity or high transmembrane pressure can be significantly improved. The degree of improvement also largely depends on the fouling propensity of the fluid to be filtered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The steady flow of non‐Newtonian power‐law fluids across a periodic square array of infinitely long circular cylinders is studied numerically using an unstructured finite volume method. The local and global flow characteristics have extensively been explored by the systematic variations of the pertinent dimensionless parameters as follows: fluid volume fraction (ϕf =.70–.99), Reynolds number (Re = 1–40), and power‐law index (n =.4–1.8). Qualitatively, the dense and curved streamlines are seen with the increasing inertial forces and shear‐thinning behavior across all the fluid volume fractions. Further, the pressure coefficient over the surface of periodic cylinders is significantly influenced by the governing parameters and found to be maximum and minimum for the upstream and downstream cylinders, respectively. The individual and total drag coefficients have shown complex dependence on n, ϕf, and Re. For shear‐thinning fluids (n < 1), the pressure drag coefficient dominates over the friction drag coefficient, whereas an opposite response is seen for the shear‐thickening fluids (n > 1) except at Re = 40. Further, both individual and total drag coefficients are observed to increase and decrease in the ranges of ϕf of.70–.90 and.92–.99, respectively, with increasing n. The strong interactions between the periodic cylinders, at smaller ϕf, diminish with a corresponding increase in ϕf. In addition, simple predictive correlations for the pressure, friction, and total drag coefficients have been developed to gain further physical insights into the detailed flow kinematics. Finally, the present findings display a good agreement with the available literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]