Search

Objectives: The prognostic relevance of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) having recently been demonstrated in patients with early‐stage favorable and advanced‐stage Hodgkin lymphoma. The current study aimed to assess the potential prognostic value of 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in early‐stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated within the German Hodgkin Study Group HD17 trial. Methods: 18F‐FDG PET/CT images were available for MTV analysis in 154 cases. We used three different threshold methods (SUV2.5, SUV4.0, and SUV41%) to calculate MTV. Receiver‐operating‐characteristic analysis was performed to describe the value of these parameters in predicting an adequate therapy response. Therapy response was evaluated as PET negativity after 2 cycles of eBEACOPP followed by 2 cycles of ABVD. Results: All three threshold methods analyzed for MTV showed a positive correlation with the PET response after chemotherapy. Areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.70 (95% CI 0.53–0.87) and 0.65 (0.50–0.80) using the fixed thresholds of SUV4.0 and SUV2.5, respectively, for MTV‐ calculation. The calculation of MTV using a relative threshold of SUV41% showed an AUC of 0.63 (0.47–0.79). Conclusions: MTV does have predictive value after chemotherapy in early‐stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly when the fixed threshold of SUV4.0 is used for MTV calculation. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01356680. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) relapsing after second‐line therapy have a dismal prognosis and novel approaches are required for this patient group. Based on promising (pre‐)clinical data and the favourable toxicity profile, we performed a phase II clinical trial with the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib in patients with relapsed or refractory cHL (r/r cHL). Methods: Patients ≥18 years with histologically confirmed r/r cHL who failed second‐line treatment were included. Ruxolitinib was given orally at a dose of 25 mg twice daily in continuous 28‐day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was the PET/CT‐based overall response rate (ORR; complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)) after 2 cycles; secondary endpoints included progression‐free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as well as feasibility. The Jericho Trial adopted a 2‐stage phase 2 design (Simon 1989). Results: Among the 12 included patients in stage 1, 2 had a PR, 3 had a stable disease (SD) and 6 had progressive disease (PD) after two treatment cycles (ORR: 2/12 evaluable patients, 16.7%). Median PFS was 3.6 months, the 1‐year OS estimate was 50.6% (median not reached). The toxicity profile was favourable with only one grade IV adverse event (7.1%) reported. Conclusion: Ruxolitinib exhibited a favourable side effect profile but modest activity in r/r cHL. Although the formal stopping criterion after stage 1 was not met, the trial did not continue to stage 2 due to the low response and PFS rates observed in stage 1. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Value of bone marrow biopsy in Hodgkin lymphoma patients staged by FDG PET: results from the German Hodgkin Study Group trials HD16, HD17, and HD18. Keywords: bone marrow involvement; Hodgkin lymphoma; intensive chemotherapy; positron emission tomography; prognosis EN bone marrow involvement Hodgkin lymphoma intensive chemotherapy positron emission tomography prognosis e5 e8 4 03/30/22 20220401 NES 220401 Newly diagnosed advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has become a curable malignancy in the vast majority of patients.1,2 With response-adapted treatment comprising four or six cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) in escalated dose (eBEACOPP), outstanding cure rates are achieved through a comparatively short and safe treatment approach.3,4 Around 5 to 15% of HL patients present with bone marrow (BM) involvement, as assessed by conventional biopsy.5-7 According to the Ann Arbor classification, BM involvement reflects a high tumour burden and therefore defines stage IV disease.8 Positron emission tomography (PET) using SP 18 sp F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) has demonstrated superior sensitivity compared to BM biopsy.9-11 In paediatric advanced HL, only individuals showing three or more BM lesions were assumed to be at higher risk for progression or relapse.12 Yet, there are insufficient data available to establish whether this also holds true for adult patients receiving intensive first-line treatment. PET imaging was shown to identify BM lesions at a higher sensitivity than biopsy of the iliac bone and has become part of diagnostic work-up in most countries.15 Current study protocols no longer recommend BM biopsy in PET-negative individuals. [Extracted from the article]

Summary: Reinduction chemotherapy followed by high‐dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDCT + ASCT) is second‐line standard of care for transplant‐eligible patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r cHL) but has a high failure rate. Because response to reinduction is predictive of the outcome after HDCT + ASCT, we aimed to improve the standard dexamethasone, high‐dose cytarabine and cisplatinum (DHAP) reinduction regimen by addition of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus (everDHAP). Transplant‐eligible patients aged 18–60 years with histologically confirmed r/r cHL were included in this experimental phase I/II trial. Everolimus (10 mg/day, determined in phase‐I‐part) was administered on day 0–13 of each DHAP cycle. From July 2014 to March 2018, 50 patients were recruited to the phase II everDHAP group; two were not evaluable, three discontinued due to toxicity. Randomization to a placebo group stopped in October 2015 due to poor recruitment after nine patients. The primary end‐point of computed tomography (CT)‐based complete remission (CR) after two cycles of everDHAP was expected to be ≥40%. With a CT‐based CR rate of 27% (n = 12/45) after two cycles of everDHAP the trial did not meet the primary end‐point. Adding everolimus to DHAP is thus feasible; however, the everDHAP regimen failed to show an improved efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: About 30% of all Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients are ≥60 years old. As lenalidomide has promising single agent activity in multiple relapsed HL, we replaced bleomycin in ABVD with lenalidomide in this phase‐I trial. Patients aged ≥60 years with early‐unfavourable‐ or advanced‐stage HL (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics score 0–7) received 4–8 cycles of AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) and lenalidomide in escalation with overdose control. Dose‐limiting toxicities (DLTs) included thromboembolism ≥grade 2, severe haematological toxicity, neutropenic fever and prolonged therapy delay. Twenty‐five patients with a median age of 68 years were included, 68% had advanced‐stage HL. A pre‐defined stopping criterion for dose escalation after DLT evaluation of 20/24 patients suggested a recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of 20 mg. DLTs occurred in 10/24 evaluable patients, all treated with ≥20 mg, however, median relative dose intensity was 97% (interquartile range 49–104%). Grade 3 or higher toxicities occurred in all 22 patients at ≥20 mg lenalidomide but no treatment‐related deaths occurred. Overall response rate was 80% for all patients (20/25) and 86% (19/22) at ≥20 mg lenalidomide. Three‐year estimates for progression‐free survival and OS were 69·7% (95% CI: 50·3–89·1%) and 83·8% (95%‐CI: 69·3–98·4%), respectively. In conclusion, AVD with lenalidomide 20 mg is feasible and highly effective in older HL patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate clinical staging is crucial for adequate risk-adapted treatment in Hodgkin lymphoma ( HL) to prevent patients from under- or over-treatment. Within the latest German Hodgkin Study Group trial generation, diagnostic findings such as histopathology, computerized tomography imaging and clinical risk factors were re-evaluated by expert panels. Here, we retrospectively analysed 5965 patients and identified 399 in who major discordant findings changed their first-line treatment allocation. Histopathology review did not confirm the initial diagnosis of HL in 87 patients. Treatment allocation was revised in 312 of the remaining 5878 patients: 176 were assigned to a higher and 128 to a lower risk group, respectively; the correct treatment group remained unclear in 8 patients. Cases of revised treatment allocation accounted for 9·8%, 6·0%, 0·8%, and 14·8% of patients initially assigned to the HD13, HD14, HD15 trials and stage IA lymphocyte-predominant HL project, respectively. Most revisions were due to wrong application of clinical stage (20·5% of 312 patients with revised treatment group), histological subtype (9·0%) or the risk factors ≥3 involved areas (46·8%) or large mediastinal mass (9·3%). In conclusion, centralized review by experienced experts changed risk-adapted first-line treatment in a relevant proportion of HL patients. Quality control measures clearly improve the accuracy of treatment and should be implemented in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article offers information on the effectiveness of lenalidomide in treating patients with refractory or multiple relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). It reports that lenalidomide is a derivative of thalidomide and is categorized in the class of immunodulatory drugs. It discusses the clinical trial conducted on patients with refractory or multiple relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma. It concludes that lenalidomide is easily tolerated within patients and high toxicity is also not observed.