Search

Granulosa cell tumors of the ovary (GCT) are the most common type of sex cord stromal tumors. Although most of patients are diagnosed at early stage and has favorable 5‐year overall survival rate, 16–23% of GCT ultimately develop recurrent disease. Recurrences are characterized by disseminated peritoneal metastasis. The treatment options include systemic chemotherapy, secondary CRS or palliative localized radiation therapy have not yet standardized due to the rarity of disease. Aggressive CRS followed up by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been shown to provide benefit in other peritoneal disease but limited data available for recurrent GCT. We have a case of recurrent Adult‐type GCT (AGCT) who was treated with CRS followed by HIPEC with mitomycin C and doxorubicin. The patient has no evidence of recurrence for approximately 11 years. An electronic search of the PubMed database with the following search terms: GCT, HIPEC showed that there were total 21 patients with recurrent GCT treated in seven different studies and 13 of 21 (61.9%) patients had no evidence of disease during follow‐up ranging from 6 to 100 months. Three patients (14.2%) died of the disease. Six studies used cisplatin for HIPEC. At least 76.2% (16 of 21, data not available for five patients) had complete cytoreduction with total 16 cases of perioperative complications but no perioperative mortality was observed. Although further investigation is needed, we propose that CRS and HIPEC can be an effective therapeutic option for recurrent GCT at experienced institutions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Currently, no tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system exists for patients with diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM). The primary objective was to formulate a clinicopathological staging system through the identification of significant prognostic parameters. METHODS: Eight international institutions with prospectively collected data on patients who underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy contributed to the registry. Two hundred ninety-four patients had complete clinicopathological data and formed the basis of this staging project. RESULTS: Peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was categorized into T1 (PCI 1-10), T2 (PCI 11-20), T3 (PCI 21-30), and T4 (PCI 30-39). Twenty-two patients had positive lymph nodes (N1) and 12 patients had extra-abdominal metastases (M1). The survival for patients with T1 (PCI 1-10) N0 M0 was significantly superior to the other patients. This group of patients is therefore designated as Stage I. The survival of patients with T2 (PCI 11-20) and T3 (PCI 21-30), in absence of N1 or M1 disease, was similar. This group of patients was categorized as Stage II. The survival of patients with T4 (PCI 30-39), N1, and/or M1 was similarly poor. This group of patients was therefore categorized as Stage III. Three prognostic factors were independently associated with survival in the multivariate analysis: histological subtype, completeness of cytoreduction, and the proposed TNM staging. The 5-year survival associated with Stage I, II, and III disease was 87%, 53%, and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed TNM staging system resulted in significant stratification of survival by stage when applied to the current multi-institutional registry data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]