Search

Background: Tube thoracostomy (TT) insertion is a commonly performed procedure in trauma that is standardised, but the optimal removal technique based on the timing in relation to the respiratory cycle remains controversial. Methods: A prospective study was undertaken at a major trauma centre in South Africa over a 4‐year period from January 2010 to December 2013, and included all patients with pneumothorax secondary to thoracic stab wounds. TTs were removed by either end of inspiration technique (EIT) or end of expiration (EET) technique and the rate of recurrent pneumothorax (RPTX) following removal was compared. We hypothesized that there is no difference in the rate of RPTX between the end inspiratory (EI) and end expiratory (EE) removal technique. Results: A total 347 patients were included. Of the 184 TTs removed by EIT, there were 17 (9%) RPTXs. Of the 163 with EET, there were 11 RPTXs (7%), (9% versus 7%, chi‐squared, P = 0.395). Of the total 28 (9%) patients with RPTXs following removal of chest tubes, two (7%) required reinsertion of chest tube (0.5% (1/184) in EIT and 0.6% (1/163) in EET, P = 0.747). Conclusions: Timing of TT removal in relation to the respiratory cycle does not appear to influence the incidence of RPTX in patients with thoracic stab wounds. Technique of removal may well be a more important consideration and more attention must be focused on refining the optimal technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The management of colon injuries in damage control surgery (DCS) remains controversial. Methods: A retrospective study investigating outcomes of penetrating colonic trauma in patients who survived beyond the initial repeat laparotomy (IRL) after DCS was performed. Patients over 18 years with penetrating colon injury and who underwent DCS from 2012 to 2020 were included from our electronic trauma registry. Demographic data, admission physiology and Injury Severity Score (ISS) were reviewed. Patients were classified into three groups: primary repair of non‐destructive injuries at DCL, delayed anastomosis of destructive injuries at IRL and diversion of destructive injuries at IRL. Outcomes observed included leak rates, length of intensive care unit stay, length of hospital stay, morbidities, mortality and colon‐related mortality. Results: Out of 584 patients with penetrating colonic trauma, 89 (15%) underwent DCS. After exclusions, 74 patients were analysed. Mean age was 32.8 years (SD 12.5); 67 (91%) were male. Mechanism of injury was gunshot in 63 (85%) and stab 11 (15%) patients. Seventeen patients underwent primary repair at DCS, of which one leaked. Twenty patients underwent delayed anastomosis at IRL. Of these, five (25%) developed leaks. Mortality was significantly higher for those with an anastomotic leak compared to those without (p < 0.001). Thirty‐seven patients were diverted at IRL. Overall mortality (p = 0.622) and colon‐related mortality (p = 0.592) were not significantly different across groups. Conclusion: Delayed anastomosis at IRL following DCL was associated with a leak rate of 25% in this study. When anastomotic leak did occur, it was associated with significant mortality. Delayed anastomosis should only be undertaken in highly selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]