Search

Objective: To assess the various factors that influence environmentally sustainable behaviour in gynaecological surgery and examine the differences between gynaecologists and residents. Design: An interview study. Setting: Academic and non‐academic hospitals in the Netherlands. Population: Gynaecologists (n = 10) and residents (n = 6). Methods: Thematic analysis of semi‐structured interviews to determine the various factors that influence environmentally sustainable behaviour in gynaecological surgery and to examine the differences between gynaecologists and residents. By using the Desmond framework and the COM‐B BCW, both organisational and individual factors related to behaviour were considered. Main outcome measures: Factors that influence environmentally sustainable behaviour. Results: Awareness is increasing but practical knowledge is insufficient. It is crucial to integrate education on the environmental impact of everyday decisions for residents and gynaecologists. Gynaecologists make their own choices but residents' autonomy is limited. There is the necessity to provide environmentally sustainable surgical equipment without compromising other standards. There is a need for a societal change that encourages safe and open communication about environmental sustainability. To transition to environmentally sustainable practices, leadership, time, collaboration with the industry and supportive regulatory changes are essential. Conclusion: This study lays the groundwork for promoting more environmentally sustainable behaviour in gynaecological surgery. The key recommendations, addressing hospital regulations, leadership, policy revisions, collaboration with the industry, guideline development and education, offer practical steps towards a more sustainable healthcare system. Encouraging environmentally sustainable practices should be embraced to enhance the well‐being of both our planet and our population, driving us closer to a more environmentally sustainable future in healthcare. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the user experience of wearing comfort of reusable sterile surgical gowns and compare these gowns with conventional disposable surgical gowns. Design: Cross‐sectional survey. Setting: An academic hospital in the Netherlands. Population: Gynaecologists, surgeons, residents and operating room assistants (n=80). Methods: Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained via a written questionnaire. Participants provided subjective comments and scored the reusable gown on each individual topic with a score from 1 to 5 (1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = moderate, 3 = good, 4 = very good, 5 = excellent) and compared the reusable gown with the conventional disposable alternative (better, equal or worse). Main outcome measures: Wearing comfort: ventilation and temperature regulation, fit and length, functionality, barrier function and ease of use. Results: The results of the overall scores of the reusable gown are scored as 'very good' (mean 4.3, SD ± 0.5) by its users. Regarding comparison of the gowns, more than 79% (lowest score 79%, highest score 95%) of the participants scored the reusable gown equal or higher on six of seven topics. The topic 'ease of use' was scored equal or higher by 59% of the participants. Subjective comments provided information on possible improvements. Conclusions: The findings of this study demonstrate that there is professional acceptance regarding the utilisation of reusable surgical gowns. To facilitate broader adoption, it is imperative to foster collaboration among suppliers and healthcare institutions. The reusable surgical gown is an environmentally sustainable, safe and comfortable alternative in the operating room. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background. In this observational study, we analysed whether a period of wait and see was reasonable following incomplete removal of submucous fibroids, with regard to symptoms of abnormal uterine bleeding, and whether factors predicting subsequent surgery could be identified. Methods. In 3 affiliated hospitals, patients with incomplete removal of submucous fibroids, treated with hysteroscopic myomectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding, between January 1997 and January 2005, were followed over time. Using life-table analysis (Kaplan-Meier method), the cumulative proportion of women having surgery-free survival following incomplete removal of submucous fibroids was calculated. Cox-proportional hazard analyses were used to analyse relationships of variables with recurrence of symptoms. Results. Forty-one consecutive patients met the inclusion criteria, and were followed over time. The mean age was 42.5 years (range 27–55). The majority of patients with incomplete removal of submucous fibroids were diagnosed with type 2 fibroids. Termination of the procedure before complete removal was achieved, was principally caused by reaching the maximum fluid deficit (90.2%). The surgery-free percentages were 70.2% (95%-CI: 55.3–85.1) at 1 year, 54.8% (95%-CI: 38.1–70.7) at 2 years, and 44.2% (95%-CI: 26.9–61.5) at 3 years. Size of fibroid (diameter) pre-operatively turned out to be of statistically significant influence, with a hazard ratio of 1.762 (95%-CI: 1.114–2.787) per cm increase in diameter (p=0.016). Conclusions. The results indicate that incomplete removal does not always seem to necessitate subsequent surgery. Instead of subsequent surgery immediately post-operatively, a wait and see policy is worth considering after incomplete removal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]