Search

The Satellite Coastal and Oceanic Atmospheric Pollution Experiment (SCOAPE) cruise in the Gulf of Mexico was conducted in May 2019 by NASA and the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to determine the feasibility of using satellite data to measure air quality in a region of concentrated oil and natural gas (ONG) operations. SCOAPE addressed both technological and scientific issues related to measuring NO2 columns over the outer continental shelf. Featured were nitrogen dioxide (NO2) instruments (Pandora, Teledyne API analyzer) at Cocodrie, LA (29.26°, −90.66°), and on the Research Vessel Point Sur operating off the Louisiana coast with measurements of ozone, carbon monoxide, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The findings: (a) all NO2 observations revealed two atmospheric regimes over the Gulf, the first influenced by tropical air in 10–14 May, the second influenced by flow from urban areas on 15–17 May; (b) comparisons of OMI v4 and TROPOMI v1.3 TC (total column) NO2 data with shipboard Pandora NO2 column observations averaged 13% agreement with the largest difference during 15–17 May (∼20%). At Cocodrie, the satellite–Pandora agreement was ∼5%. (c) Three new‐model Pandora instruments displayed a TC NO2 precision of 0.01 Dobson Units (∼5%); (d) regions of smaller, older natural gas operations showed high methane readings from leakage; elevated VOCs were also detected. Neither satellite nor spectrometer captured the magnitude of ambient NO2 variability near ONG platforms. Given an absence of regular air quality monitoring over the Gulf of Mexico, SCOAPE data constitute a baseline against which future observations can be compared. Plain Language Summary: The Satellite Coastal and Oceanic Atmospheric Pollution Experiment (SCOAPE) cruise in the Gulf of Mexico (GOM) conducted on the Research Vessel Point Sur in May 2019 investigated the feasibility of using satellite data to measure air quality in a region of concentrated oil and natural gas (ONG) operations. SCOAPE addressed both technological and scientific issues related to measuring NO2 columns in a prototypical coastal environment. The results are as follows. First, measurements from SCOAPE demonstrated that satellite NO2 data can be used to monitor ONG activity over the GOM. Second, during SCOAPE both OMI and TROPOMI TC (total column) NO2 amounts were higher over land and sometimes the near‐shore ONG‐rich Gulf, than over deepwater regions farther offshore. This was confirmed by Pandora spectrometer "ground truth" TC NO2 data measured throughout SCOAPE on shore and on ship. Third, SCOAPE established the reliability and precision of a new generation of Pandora spectrometers. Fourth, comparisons of satellite and Pandora TC NO2 data in SCOAPE confirm previous land–water interface studies that point to limitations in satellite NO2 in coastal regions. Finally, neither satellite nor spectrometer captures the magnitude of ambient ("nose‐level") NO2 variability in a region dotted with hundreds of ONG platforms. Key Points: Shipboard Pandora NO2 columns and surface O3, NO2, CO, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) over the Gulf of Mexico (GOM), May 2019, displayed two air quality (AQ) regimesGOM AQ was dominated by continental NO2 sources and near‐shore VOC; deepwater oil platforms were in a clean marine regimePandora and satellite total column NO2 over GOM agreed overall within 5% in clean, clear‐sky conditions along the coast and 13% over water [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigate regional sources contributing to CO during the Korea United States Air Quality (KORUS‐AQ) campaign conducted over Korea (1 May to 10 June 2016) using 17 tagged CO simulations from the Community Atmosphere Model with chemistry (CAM‐chem). The simulations use three spatial resolutions, three anthropogenic emission inventories, two meteorological fields, and nine emission scenarios. These simulations are evaluated against measurements from the DC‐8 aircraft and Measurements Of Pollution In The Troposphere (MOPITT). Results show that simulations using bottom‐up emissions are consistently lower (bias: −34 to −39%) and poorer performing (Taylor skill: 0.38–0.61) than simulations using alternative anthropogenic emissions (bias: −6 to −33%; Taylor skill: 0.48–0.86), particularly for enhanced Asian CO and volatile organic compound (VOC) emission scenarios, suggesting underestimation in modeled CO background and emissions in the region. The ranges of source contributions to modeled CO along DC‐8 aircraft from Korea and southern (90°E to 123°E, 20°N to 29°N), middle (90°E to 123°E, 29°N to 38.5°N), and northern (90°E to 131.5°E, 38.5°N to 45°N) East Asia (EA) are 6–13%, ~5%, 16–28%, and 9–18%, respectively. CO emissions from middle and northern EA can reach Korea via transport within the boundary layer, whereas those from southern EA are transported to Korea mainly through the free troposphere. Emission contributions from middle EA dominate during continental outflow events (29–51%), while Korean emissions play an overall more important role for ground sites (up to 25–49%) and plumes within the boundary layer (up to 25–44%) in Korea. Finally, comparisons with four other source contribution approaches (FLEXPART 9.1 back trajectory calculations driven by Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) WRF inert tracer, China signature VOCs, and CO to CO2 enhancement ratios) show general consistency with CAM‐chem. Key Points: Korean sources contribute 6‐13% to CO along DC‐8 flight tracks, while contributions of different East Asian subregions vary from 5% to 28%Middle East Asian sources dominate (up to 64%) continental outflows to Korea, but Korean emissions are more important for CO near surfaceContributions using CAM‐chem tags agree with FLEXPART‐WRF back trajectories, WRF NO2 inert tracers, China signature VOCs, and CO/CO2 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]