Search

Imaging the structure of major fault zones is essential for our understanding of crustal deformations and their implications on seismic hazards. Investigating such complex regions presents several issues, including the variation of seismic velocity due to the diversity of geological units and the cumulative damage caused by earthquakes. Conventional migration techniques are in general strongly sensitive to the available velocity model. Here we apply a passive matrix imaging approach which is robust to the mismatch between this model and the real seismic velocity distribution. This method relies on the cross‐correlation of ambient noise recorded by a geophone array. The resulting set of impulse responses form a reflection matrix that contains all the information about the subsurface. In particular, the reflected body waves can be leveraged to: (a) determine the transmission matrix between the Earth's surface and any point in the subsurface; (b) build a confocal image of the subsurface reflectivity with a transverse resolution only limited by diffraction. As a study case, we consider seismic noise (0.1–0.5 Hz) recorded by the Dense Array for Northern Anatolia that consists of 73 stations deployed for 18 months in the region of the 1999 Izmit earthquake. Passive matrix imaging reveals the scattering structure of the crust and upper mantle around the North Anatolian Fault zone over a depth range of 60 km. The results show that most of the scattering is associated with the Northern branch that passes throughout the crust and penetrates into the upper mantle. Plain Language Summary: Investigating the structure of major fault zones is important to understand the deformations of the Earth's crust and their potential impact on future earthquakes. However, the large variations of seismic velocity between different geological units drastically hampers the ability to image those areas. The North Anatolian Fault is no exception since it splits into two branches separating three major geological blocks in the region of the 1999 Izmit earthquake. To image the deep structure of this fault, seismic noise is here exploited to retrieve information on the body waves reflected by the underground heterogeneities. A three‐dimensional map of the subsurface reflectivity is then built by applying methods originally developed in optical microscopy and ultrasound for deep imaging inside complex media. The inner structure of the Earth around the North Anatolian Fault is revealed. In particular, the Northern branch is shown to exhibit a strong damage pattern and a deep penetration inside the upper mantle. Key Points: A matrix approach of passive seismology provides 3D imaging of the North Anatolian Fault, Turkey, over a depth range of 60 kmTransmission matrix between the Earth surface and the underground is extracted by means of spatio‐temporal correlations of seismic noiseTime reversal of this transmission matrix enables a sharp compensation of the seismic velocity variations in the fault area [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Anatolian Plateau, currently experiencing rapid uplift and westward escape, records both the termination of oceanic subduction and the conversion to continental collision. The crustal response to the transition of the subduction environment from eastern to western Anatolia can be inferred by the seismic velocity and attenuation structures. With this study, we construct a broadband Lg‐wave attenuation model for the Anatolian Plateau and use it to constrain lateral crust heterogeneities linked to this transition. Crustal Lg attenuation links late Cenozoic magmatism with asthenospheric upwelling by characterizing the lithospheric thermal structure. The widely distributed strong attenuation observed in eastern Anatolia may be related to the crustal partial melting due to mantle upwelling after the delamination and subsequent break‐off of the Bitlis slab. Lithospheric dripping in central Anatolia likely facilitates the mantle flows through the window between the Cyprus and Aegean slabs, which results in the piecemeal low QLg ${Q}_{\mathit{Lg}}$ anomaly in central Anatolia. Plain Language Summary: Different parts of the Anatolian Plateau are in different evolution stages between oceanic subduction and continental collision and currently undergoing plateau uplift and tectonic escape. The regional seismic velocity and attenuation can be used to characterize crustal partial melting and lateral heterogeneity, which can further identify the underlying subduction process. In this study, we construct a high‐resolution broadband Lg‐wave attenuation model for the Anatolian Plateau. Strong Lg attenuation in Anatolia correlates well with late Cenozoic magmatism distributions and can be an indicator of high temperature or partial melting in the crust. Combined with previous studies, we suggest that the mantle upwelling induced by the delamination of the Bitlis slab is likely reworking the crust in eastern Anatolia and is the cause of widespread thermal anomalies there. The lithospheric dripping process in central Anatolia may facilitate the mantle flows through the window between the Cyprus and Aegean slabs, and results in a piecemeal low QLg ${Q}_{\mathit{Lg}}$ anomaly pattern in central Anatolia. Key Points: A high‐resolution broadband Lg‐wave attenuation model is constructed for the Anatolian PlateauWidespread strong attenuation in the eastern Anatolian crust is likely related to slab delaminationThe circular‐shaped attenuation anomaly may result from slab tearing and lithospheric dripping beneath central Anatolia [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The present study investigates azimuthal anisotropy and its relation to the geodynamical processes beneath the back‐arc of the Hellenic subduction zone in the eastern Aegean and western Anatolia where surface tectonics is dominated by the right‐lateral strike‐slip North Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) in the north and E‐W oriented normal fault systems. We obtained apparent SKS splitting parameters from 1,660 good quality and 137 null measurements extracted from 542 events recorded at 40 permanent broadband seismic stations. Overall, the station‐averaged splitting parameters indicate NNE‐SSW oriented fast directions (∼N20°E) and splitting delays around ∼1.5 s. The large splitting delays, particularly observed beneath the northern Aegean can be explained by either an enlarged mantle wedge thickness or increased strength of upper mantle anisotropy. We constrain complex anisotropy structures within two layer models from notable backazimuthal variations in individual splitting measurements observed beneath a few stations at the north located in a close proximity to the NAFZ and central‐western Anatolia. At the western end of the NAFZ, our estimated upper layer anisotropy direction (at ∼120 km) is rather parallel to the NAFZ reflecting the imprint of a lithospheric petrofabric formed by recent deformation while in central‐western Anatolia they correlate well with maximum shear directions and small splitting delays (∼0.6 s) appear to further support relatively thin lithosphere (∼90 km). An overall pattern of extension‐parallel fast directions (N10°E) within lower layer can be attributed to the slab rollback‐induced mantle flow that is highly oblique with respect to the WSW‐ward motion of the Anatolian lithosphere. Plain Language Summary: Seismological constrains on uppermost mantle structures provide essential information for better understanding of the geodynamic processes that have shaped the current deformation in complex tectonic regions. To investigate the seismic anisotropy, which is the directional dependence of seismic wave velocities, and its relation to the geodynamical processes in the upper mantle of eastern Aegean and western Anatolia, we performed splitting measurements on core‐mantle refracted shear waves recorded by 40 permanent broadband seismic stations. We overall estimate NE‐SW oriented fast polarization directions, and delay times between 0.65 and 2.2 s. The results imply that the origin of observed seismic anisotropy can be mostly explained by a combined effect of an internal deformation of the mantle lithosphere and asthenosphere. Our findings reveal the presence of two‐layer anisotropy outlining complicated structures, primarily in the upper mantle of NW Anatolia associated with the western end of North Anatolian Fault Zone. Future numerical modeling and anisotropy studies should be considered to test these results for further interpretation. Key Points: Observed seismic anisotropy can be explained by a combined effect of internal deformation of the mantle lithosphere and asthenosphereThe presence of two‐layer anisotropy is obtained beneath the upper mantle of NW AnatoliaA distinct counter‐clockwise rotation of average fast polarization directions from north to south of the Aegean region is estimated [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]