Search

We use state space methods to estimate a large dynamic factor model for the Norwegian economy involving 93 variables for 1978Q2–2005Q4. The model is used to obtain forecasts for 22 key variables that can be derived from the original variables by aggregation. To investigate the potential gain in using such a large information set, we compare the forecasting properties of the dynamic factor model with those of univariate benchmark models. We find that there is an overall gain in using the dynamic factor model, but that the gain is notable only for a few of the key variables. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An estimating method for spectral densities of Gaussian time series that belong to a parametric model is proposed. Spectral density estimators are evaluated by using average Kullback–Leibler divergence from the true spectral density to estimated spectral densities. In the classical approach, unknown spectral densities are estimated by replacing the unknown parameters by asymptotically efficient estimates. In the alternative method introduced in the present paper, spectral density estimates usually do not belong to the model. The alternative spectral density estimators asymptotically dominate the classical ones. The difference in average Kullback–Leibler divergence between them can be regarded as the mixture mean curvature of the model in the space of all spectral densities. The explicit expression for the proposed estimators of spectral densities of autoregressive processes is obtained. The accuracy of prediction can be improved by using predictors that correspond to the alternative spectral density estimators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper we consider time series models belonging to the autoregressive (AR) family and deal with the estimation of the residual variance. This is important because estimates of the variance are involved in, for example, confidence sets for the parameters of the model, estimation of the spectrum, expressions for the estimated error of prediction and sample quantities used to make inferences about the order of the model. We consider the asymptotic biases for moment and least squares estimators of the residual variance, and compare them with known results when available and with those for maximum likelihood estimators under normality. Simulation results are presented for finite samples [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]