Search

Background: Skin cancer is strongly associated with photodamaged skin, but body sites are often referred to as 'exposed' or 'unexposed' to sun without recognizing extent of site‐specific variation. Objectives: To assess whole‐body patterns of photodamage in an Australian population. Methods: A random sample of adult residents of Queensland underwent imaging across 10 body sites. Photodamage was graded from images using an ordinal photonumeric scale. We used cluster analysis to identify whole‐body photodamage patterns and prevalence proportion ratios (PPRs) to assess associated factors. Results: Of 190 adults (median age 52; 58% males), 58% showed severe or moderate‐to‐severe photodamage on most body sites. A higher proportion of woman had severe photodamage on the arms (upper: P = 0.002, lower: P = 0.034). A higher proportion of men had moderate or severe photodamage on the lower back (P = 0.004). We identified four photodamage patterns: 'severe general' (n = 24, 13%), 'moderate‐severe general' (n = 86, 45%), 'moderate‐severe v‐neck' (n = 40, 21%) and 'mild‐moderate upper body' (n = 12, 6%). All participants with 'severe‐general' photodamage were >50 years and more likely to have past skin cancer (PPR: 2.54, 95% CI: 1.44–4.49) than those with 'moderate‐severe v‐neck' photodamage. Those with 'moderate‐severe general' photodamage showed similar associations and were more likely female (PPR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.04–1.69). Past or current smoking was associated with having higher levels of photodamage, with no smokers in those with 'mild‐moderate upper body' photodamage. Conclusions: Moderate‐to‐severe photodamage across much of the body is common in Queensland adults and associated with age, sex, past skin cancer and smoking. Assuming a universal pattern of site‐specific sun exposure could lead to spurious correlations, while accurate and objective assessment of site‐specific photodamage can add to understanding of the development of sun‐associated skin cancers, in particular site‐specific skin carcinogenesis. Additionally, degree of site‐specific photodamage has the potential to assist skin cancer screening. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: People at high risk of developing melanoma are usually identified by pigmentary and naevus phenotypes. Objective: We examined whether associations of these phenotypes with melanoma risk differed by ambient sun exposure or participant characteristics in two population‐based, case–control studies with comparable ancestry but different ambient sun exposure. Methods: Data were analysed from 616 cases and 496 controls from the Australian Melanoma Family Study and 2012 cases and 504 controls from the Leeds (UK) case–control study. Questionnaire, interview and dermatological skin examination data were collected using the same measurement protocols. Relative risks were estimated as odds ratios using unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for potential confounders. Results: Hair and skin colour were the strongest pigmentary phenotype risk factors. All associations of pigmentary phenotype with melanoma risk were similar across countries. The median number of clinically assessed naevi was approximately three times higher in Australia than Leeds, but the relative risks for melanoma associated with each additional common or dysplastic naevus were higher for Leeds than Australia, especially for naevi on the upper and lower limbs. Higher naevus counts on the head and neck were associated with a stronger relative risk for melanoma for women than men. The two countries had similar relative risks for melanoma based on self‐reported naevus density categories, but personal perceptions of naevus number differed by country. There was no consistent evidence of interactions between phenotypes on risk. Conclusions: Classifying people at high risk of melanoma based on their number of naevi should ideally take into account their country of residence, type of counts (clinical or self‐reported), body site on which the naevus counts are measured and sex. The presence of naevi may be a stronger indicator of a genetic predisposition in the UK than in Australia based on less opportunity for sun exposure to influence naevus development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This systematic review examines variations in outcomes along the breast cancer continuum for Australian women by Indigenous status. Multiple databases were systematically searched for peer-reviewed articles published from 1 January 1990 to 1 March 2015 focussing on adult female breast cancer patients in Australia and assessing survival, patient and tumour characteristics, diagnosis and treatment by Indigenous status. Sixteen quantitative studies were included with 12 rated high, 3 moderate and 1 as low quality. No eligible studies on referral, treatment choices, completion or follow-up were retrieved. Indigenous women had poorer survival most likely reflecting geographical isolation, advanced disease, patterns of care, comorbidities and disadvantage. They were also more likely to be diagnosed when younger, have advanced disease or comorbidities, reside in disadvantaged or remote areas, and less likely to undergo mammographic screening or surgery. Despite wide heterogeneity across studies, an overall pattern of poorer survival for Indigenous women and variations along the breast cancer continuum of care was evident. The predominance of state-specific studies and small numbers of included Indigenous women made forming a national perspective difficult. The review highlighted the need to improve Indigenous identification in cancer registries and administrative databases and identified key gaps notably the lack of qualitative studies in current literature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]