Search

Thirty-eight ambulatory patients with congestive cardiac failure took part in a double-blind clinical trial of 50 mg hydrochlorothiazide orally daily and slow-release formulation of 60 mg furosemide orally daily. Following a one-week period of placebo administration, patients were randomly allocated to the treatment which they continued for six weeks. Other diuretic drugs were discontinued at entry, but antihypertensive drugs and digoxin were continued during the study at constant dosage. A controlled sodium diet was prescribed. Clinical observations and biochemical and hematologic measurements were made before, during, and at the end of the study. There was an improvement in the clinical condition of patients in both treatment groups, but no significant difference between treatments (with or without digitalis) was detected. Both treatments were clinically well tolerated; however, the tendency of hypokalemia was more pronounced in the hydrochlorothiazide group. This could be hazardous in patients who receive a concomitant cardiac glycoside, especially when no clear-cut benefit of concomitant digitalis therapy is demonstrated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The analgesic efficacy of 100 and 200 mg isoxepac was compared with that of 50 mg indomethacin in a double-blind, single-dose, between-patient (parallel) study with placebo control. Oral doses were administered to 120 patients whose postoperative plan justified administration of analgesics on the morning of the day following knee surgery for meniscectomy. No appreciable differences emerged between 100 mg isoxepac and placebo, though 50 mg indomethacin and 200 mg isoxepac gave better analgesia than either 100 mg isoxepac or placebo. Peak and duration of pain relief was of the same order with 50 mg indomethacin, and 200 mg isoxepac would appear to be the minimal effective dose in the clinical setting of postoperative pain following knee meniscectomy. The incidence of side effects on all three active treatments was remarkedly low. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]