Search

Objective: To evaluate the effect of storage time and temperature on the effectiveness of bleaching agents. Methods: Enamel slabs were randomly allocated according to the concentration of carbamide peroxide (CP): 10% (CP10) and 16% (CP16). Shade evaluations were conducted at baseline and then after 3 and 12 months of storage at 3 different temperatures: 10°C (±2°C), 25°C (±2°C), and 35°C (±2°C). Objective color evaluation was performed (spectrophotometer CIEL*a*b* system and CIEDE2000) to calculate the color change (ΔE00). Subjective evaluation was performed using the VITA classical shade guide followed by shade variation (ΔS). Results: The bleaching effect of different CP concentrations (10% and 16%) at baseline showed no differences with regard to objective (ΔE00) and subjective parameters (ΔS) (P > .05). No differences were observed between CP concentrations stored for the same length of time and at the same temperature for either parameter (P > .05). In terms of objective measurement (ΔE00), a reduction in the bleaching effect was shown for both CP concentrations (10% and 16%) when stored for 12 months at 35°C, and compared with the baseline (P < .05). As regards the subjective parameters (ΔS), after 12 months, both CP concentrations (10% and 16%) stored at 35°C showed a decrease in bleaching capacity compared to baseline (P < .05). CP10 and CP16 stored at 10°C and 25°C did not suffer any loss in bleaching ability, even after 12 months (P > .05). Conclusions: The storage of bleaching agents for long periods at high temperatures can reduce the bleaching effectiveness of CP at 10% and 16%. Clinical Significance: Clinicians must be made aware that they should store their bleaching products under proper temperature conditions and use them within an appropriate time frame; otherwise, the bleaching effect could be lost. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Objective Materials and Methods Results Conclusions Clinical Significance To map the evidence regarding the clinical performance of posterior restorations with bulk‐fill resin composites and identify research gaps.This mapping review was conducted following PRISMA‐ScR guidelines for scoping reviews, and its protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework platform. Systematic searches were conducted, considering studies published between 2013 and February 2024 in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Clinical studies investigating the performance of bulk‐fill resin composite restorations in class I and/or class II preparations with increments of 4 to 5 mm were included.A total of 147 articles were identified, and based on the eligibility criteria, 26 studies were selected for descriptive analysis. Of the reviewed studies, 73% (n = 19) investigated high‐viscosity bulk‐fill composites, while 30% (n = 8) focused on low‐viscosity bulk‐fill composites. Evaluation periods ranged from 1 week to 10 years. Reported annual failure rates varied from 0% to 3%, with survival rates between 78.9% and 100%.Bulk‐fill resin composites of high viscosity were the most analyzed in the published studies, with evaluation periods of up to 10 years. The review of available scientific evidence showed clinically acceptable performance for composite bulk‐fill restorations, with high survival rates and minimal annual failure rates. There is a need for long‐term clinical studies on bulk‐fill resin composites.This review demonstrates that both high and low‐viscosity bulk‐fill resin composites exhibit satisfactory clinical performance, which can help clinicians optimize chairside time. However, it is important to highlight the need for further studies with longer follow‐up periods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To map the evidence regarding the clinical performance of posterior restorations with bulk-fill resin composites and identify research gaps., Materials and Methods: This mapping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines for scoping reviews, and its protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework platform. Systematic searches were conducted, considering studies published between 2013 and February 2024 in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Clinical studies investigating the performance of bulk-fill resin composite restorations in class I and/or class II preparations with increments of 4 to 5 mm were included., Results: A total of 147 articles were identified, and based on the eligibility criteria, 26 studies were selected for descriptive analysis. Of the reviewed studies, 73% (n = 19) investigated high-viscosity bulk-fill composites, while 30% (n = 8) focused on low-viscosity bulk-fill composites. Evaluation periods ranged from 1 week to 10 years. Reported annual failure rates varied from 0% to 3%, with survival rates between 78.9% and 100%., Conclusions: Bulk-fill resin composites of high viscosity were the most analyzed in the published studies, with evaluation periods of up to 10 years. The review of available scientific evidence showed clinically acceptable performance for composite bulk-fill restorations, with high survival rates and minimal annual failure rates. There is a need for long-term clinical studies on bulk-fill resin composites., Clinical Significance: This review demonstrates that both high and low-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites exhibit satisfactory clinical performance, which can help clinicians optimize chairside time. However, it is important to highlight the need for further studies with longer follow-up periods., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)