Search

This case study provides a critical discourse analysis of 121 letters of complaint and self‐advocacy authored by Natasha Keating, a trans woman incarcerated in two Australian male correctional facilities from 2000 to 2007. During her incarceration, Natasha experienced victimization, misgendering, microaggression, and institutional discrimination. Despite this, Natasha embodied and "fought" against the injustices she experienced, whilst seeking to speak for other trans incarcerated persons also silenced and treated with indifference, contributing to changes in the carceral system. This original case study analyzes the discursive strategies Natasha employed to construct and reclaim an affirming self‐identity through a deliberate campaign to effect social change and policy concessions within a system designed to curtail self‐determination. Through her empathic and impassioned letter‐writing approach, leveraging a military metaphor, this novel analysis showcases the significant implications her activism/agentism and determination had in naming and seeking to dismantle the systems of oppression trans incarcerated women experience. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For example, even where people do not personally feel prejudicially towards PLHIV, their HIV testing may be inhibited where they perceive that others would feel prejudicially etc towards them if they were seen HIV testing. Conceptualising, measuring, and addressing HIV-related stigma: Towards reducing disparities in HIV testing and HIV-related outcomes among migrants of HIV unknown or negative status in high-income countries Earnshaw and Chaudoir developed the HIV-related Stigma Framework.1 This individual level Framework includes stigma mechanisms for PLHIV, and people of HIV negative status. [Extracted from the article]

Background Chlamydia trachomatis infection is the most commonly notified sexually transmissible bacterial infection in the developed world. An effective approach to improve screening lies with programs that specifically target high risk populations through accessible testing strategies. Objective To pilot the distribution of chlamydia postal testing kits through a network of community pharmacies. Methods Chlamydia postal test kits, adapted from a current online service, were sold at a minimal price across 18 community pharmacies located in Brisbane. Samples, collected by Uri swab, were mailed to a centralised service for processing, and results directly communicated to clients. Results Over a 9-month period, 333 test kits were made available through pharmacies, of which 109 (32.7% of total) were sold. Of these, 43 specimens were returned for processing, comprising 39.4% of sales, or 12.9% of total. Of these returned samples, seven (16.3% of specimens) returned a reactive result, 34 specimens were non-reactive and one was invalid. Conclusions Despite a low specimen return rate (12.9% of total kits available, 39.4% of kits sold), a high reactivity rate (16.3%) for chlamydia was identified among those persons purchasing a kit and returning a sample, suggesting that the pharmacy program had been effectively targeted. Overall, this pilot has demonstrated the feasibility of a system for distributing chlamydia test kits through pharmacy and the use of the existing health infrastructure to follow up results and manage clients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Issue addressed The fly-in, fly-out (FIFO) and drive-in, drive-out (DIDO) models of mining in Australia have led to concerns about adverse health and psychosocial impacts. Despite speculation that increased levels of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in Australia, including HIV, are associated with FIFO/DIDO work, we know little about sexual risk-taking behaviours in mining populations. This study explores differences in sexual risk taking and perceptions of risk between FIFO/DIDO miners and residential miners. Methods A cross-sectional survey was administered to a sample (n=444) of male miners working in Queensland, Australia. The self-completed survey contained 49 questions relating to knowledge, attitudes and behaviour and included demographic information and specific items related to sex and relationships. Results FIFO/DIDO status was not associated with any differential sexual risk-taking behaviours, except for an increased probability of reporting 'ever being diagnosed with an STI'; 10.8% of FIFO/DIDO respondents versus 3.6% of others (x(2) (1)=4.43, P=0.35). Conclusions Our results appear to counter anecdotal evidence that FIFO/DIDO miners engage in higher sexual risk behaviours when compared with residential miners. So what? Anecdotal evidence linking the rise of sexually transmitted infections with the FIFO/DIDO mining workforce could drive costly and unnecessary approaches to prevention. Further research, surveillance and monitoring are required to inform health promotion interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]