Search

The January 2022 eruption of Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai (HTHH) injected a huge amount (∼150 Tg) of water vapor (H2O) into the stratosphere, along with small amount of SO2. An off‐line 3‐D chemical transport model (CTM) successfully reproduces the spread of the injected H2O through October 2023 as observed by the Microwave Limb Sounder. Dehydration in the 2023 Antarctic polar vortex caused the first substantial (∼20 Tg) removal of HTHH H2O from the stratosphere. The CTM indicates that this process will dominate removal of HTHH H2O for the coming years, giving an overall e‐folding timescale of 4 years; around 25 Tg of the injected H2O is predicted to still remain in the stratosphere by 2030. Following relatively low Antarctic column ozone in midwinter 2023 due to transport effects, additional springtime depletion due to H2O‐related chemistry was small and maximized at the vortex edge (10 DU in column). Plain Language Summary: Around 150 Tg (150 million tons) of water vapor was injected into the stratosphere during the eruption of Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai. Water vapor is a greenhouse gas and this increase is expected to have a warming effect in the troposphere, as well causing perturbations in stratospheric chemistry and aerosols. We use an atmospheric model to study the residence time of this excess water vapor and its impact on the recent Antarctic ozone hole. The model performance is evaluated by comparison with satellite measurements. Wintertime dehydration in the Antarctic stratosphere in 2023 is found to be an important mechanism for removal of the volcanic water from the stratosphere. However, the overall removal rate is predicted to be slow; around 25 Tg (17%) is still present in 2030. The direct impact of the excess water vapor on ozone via chemical processes in the Antarctic ozone hole in 2023 is small. Key Points: Antarctic dehydration is a major removal pathway of stratospheric H2O injected from Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai (HTHH) eruptionHTHH H2O caused small (up to 10 DU) additional chemical ozone depletion in 2023 Antarctic springModel indicates e‐folding timescale of 4 years for removal of HTHH H2O from stratosphere [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Substantial and prolonged enhancements in stratospheric water vapor (SWV) have occurred after large‐magnitude explosive tropical volcanic eruptions, with modified tropopause entry caused by aerosol‐absorptive heating. Here, we analyze the timing and longevity of heating‐driven post‐eruption SWV changes within CMIP6‐VolMIP short‐term climate‐response experiments with the UK Earth System Model (UKESM1). We find aerosol‐absorptive heating causes peak SWV increases of 17% (∼1 ppmv) and 10% (0.5 ppmv) at 100 and 50 hPa, at ∼18 and ∼23 months after a Pinatubo‐like eruption, respectively. We track the temperature response in the tropical lower stratosphere and identify the main SWV increase occurs only after the descending aerosol heating reaches the tropopause, suggesting a key role for aerosol microphysical processes (sedimentation rate). We explore how El Niño–Southern Oscillation variability modulates this effect. Post‐eruption SWV increases are ∼80% stronger for the La Nina phase compared to the ensemble mean. Tropical upwelling strongly mediates this effect. Plain Language Summary: Strong volcanic eruptions, such as the 1991 eruption of Mt Pinatubo, inject a large amount of SO2 directly into the stratosphere, thereby enhancing the stratospheric aerosol layer and causing a short‐term climatic perturbation. Another substantial part of the climatic influence is the change in stratospheric water vapor (SWV), which affects the chemical processes and the radiative budget of the atmosphere. Along with near‐instantaneous injection of water vapor into the stratosphere, volcanic eruptions can indirectly enhance the entry of water vapor into the stratosphere through aerosol‐induced tropopause heating. This work analyses Earth system model experiments designed to explore how volcanic impacts combine with internal climate variability. We find that peak SWV entry mixing ratios occur only within the second post‐eruption year, consistent with the substantially lagged timing of SWV increase seen in post‐Pinatubo satellite measurements. This analysis provides a new perspective on the temporal evolution of the observed post‐Pinatubo SWV increase and an improved quantification of its impacts. Key Points: Aerosol‐induced absorptive‐heating increases stratospheric water vapor (SWV) by up to 17% at 18 months post‐eruption in a Pinatubo‐like experimentAnalyzing simulations by El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) variability show an 80% larger peak SWV increase occurs if an eruption is followed by a La Niña phaseThe timing of peak SWV increase occurs when volcanic‐aerosol‐induced heating reaches the tropopause, with ENSO modulation of tropical upwelling [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the winter and spring of 2019/2020, the unusually cold, strong, and stable polar vortex created favorable conditions for ozone depletion in the Arctic. Chemical ozone loss started earlier than in any previous year in the satellite era and continued until late March, resulting in the unprecedented reduction of the ozone column. The vortex was located above the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory in Eureka, Canada (80°N, 86°W) from late February to the end of April, presenting an excellent opportunity to examine ozone loss from a single ground station. Measurements from a suite of instruments show that total column ozone was at an all‐time low in the 20‐year data set, 22–102 DU below previous records set in 2011. Ozone minima (<200 DU), enhanced OClO and BrO slant columns, and unusually low‐HCl, ClONO2, and HNO3 columns were observed in March. Polar stratospheric clouds were present as late as 20 March, and ozonesondes show unprecedented depletion in the March and April profiles (to <0.2 ppmv). While both chemical and dynamical factors lead to reduced ozone when the vortex is cold, the contribution of chemical depletion (based on the variable correlation of ozone and temperature) was exceptional in spring 2020 when compared to typical Arctic winters. Mean chemical ozone loss over Eureka was estimated to be 111–126 DU (27%–31%) using April measurements and passive ozone from the SLIMCAT chemical transport model. While absolute ozone loss was generally smaller in 2020 than in 2011, percentage ozone loss was greater in 2020. Plain Language Summary: While an ozone hole forms over Antarctica every year, the Arctic typically does not experience such dramatic ozone loss. The chlorine and bromine (halogen) reactions that destroy ozone require very low temperatures that are rarely observed in the Arctic stratosphere. The winter and spring of 2019/2020, however, was unusually cold in the Arctic, and consequently, a large amount of ozone was destroyed by halogen chemistry. To understand the behavior of ozone in spring 2020, we use measurements from the Polar Environment Atmospheric Research Laboratory in Eureka, Canada. Eureka (at 80°N) is one of the northernmost research stations in the world, and thus an ideal location to observe ozone loss. Spring 2020 ozone minima were lower than any in the 20‐year data set, and ozone destruction was ongoing until the end of March, which is rare in the Arctic. While ozone concentrations are largely determined by circulation patterns in the Arctic stratosphere, chemistry in spring 2020 was a much larger factor than usual. Halogen chemistry destroyed 27%–31% of the total ozone, compared to about 10% in a typical winter. The only year on record with comparable ozone loss is 2011, and a larger percentage of the ozone column was lost in 2020. Key Points: Record low ozone columns (<200 DU) were observed over Eureka in spring 2020Limited dynamical resupply of ozone and chemical destruction both contributed to reduced ozone columnsMean chemical ozone loss of 111–126 DU (27%–31%) represents similar absolute loss and greater relative loss compared to that in spring 2011 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The phase out of anthropogenic ozone‐depleting substances such as chlorofluorocarbons under the terms of the Montreal Protocol led to the development and worldwide use of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) in refrigeration, air conditioning, and as blowing agents and propellants. Consequently, over recent years, the atmospheric abundances of HFCs have dramatically increased. HFCs are powerful greenhouse gases and are now controlled under the terms of the 2016 Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol. HFC‐134a is currently the most abundant HFC in the atmosphere, breaking the 100 ppt barrier in 2018, and can be measured in the Earth's atmosphere by the satellite remote‐sensing instrument ACE‐FTS (Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment‐Fourier Transform Spectrometer), which has been measuring since 2004. This work uses the ACE‐FTS v4.0 data product to investigate global distributions and trends of HFC‐134a. These measurements are compared with a simulation of SLIMCAT, a state‐of‐the‐art three‐dimensional chemical transport model, which is constrained by global surface HFC‐134a measurements. The agreement between observation and model is good, although in the tropical troposphere ACE‐FTS measurements are biased low by up to 10–15 ppt. The overall ACE‐FTS global trend of HFC‐134a for the altitude range 5.5–24.5 km and 2004–2018 time period is approximately linear with a value of 4.49 ± 0.02 ppt/year, slightly lower than the corresponding SLIMCAT trend of 4.66 ppt/year. Using a simple box model, we also estimate the annual global emissions and burdens of HFC‐134a from the model data, indicating that emissions of HFC‐134a have increased almost linearly, reaching 236 Gg by 2018. Key Points: First comparison between long‐term satellite measurements (ACE‐FTS) of atmospheric HFC‐134a and a 3D chemical transport model (SLIMCAT)Observations agree well with SLIMCAT, although ACE‐FTS is biased low by up to 10–15 ppt in the troposphere between 30°S and 30°NGlobal trends are linear to a good approximation: 4.49 ppt/year for ACE‐FTS (2004–2018; 5.5–24.5 km) and 4.66 ppt/year for SLIMCAT [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Satellite observations of relevant trace gases and meteorological data from ERA5 were used to describe the dynamics and chemistry of the spectacular Arctic 2019/20 winter/spring season. Exceptionally low total ozone values of slightly less than 220 DU were observed in mid‐March within an unusually large stratospheric polar vortex. Very high OClO and very low NO2 column amounts observed by GOME‐2A were indicative of unusually large active chlorine levels and significant denitrification, which likely contributed to large chemical ozone loss. Using results from the TOMCAT chemical transport model (CTM) and ozone observations from S5P/TROPOMI, GOME‐2 (total column), SCIAMACHY, and OMPS‐LP (vertical profiles), chemical ozone loss was evaluated and compared with the previous record Arctic winter 2010/11. The polar‐vortex‐averaged total column ozone loss in 2019/20 reached 88 DU (23%) and 106 DU (28%) based upon observations and model, respectively, by the end of March, which was similar to that derived for 2010/11. The maximum ozone loss (∼80%) observed by OMPS‐LP was near the 450 K potential temperature level (∼18 km altitude). Because of the larger polar vortex area in March 2020 compared to March 2011 (about 25% at 450 K), ozone mass loss was larger in Arctic winter 2019/20. It is shown that Arctic cap temperatures were at a record 40‐year low in winter, suggesting that Arctic cold winters are getting colder. Tropical UTLS temperatures show an apparent upward trend during the last two decades that may indicate a weakening of the Brewer‐Dobson circulation and strengthening of the polar vortex. Key Points: Very large OClO and very low NO2 slant columns were observed by GOME‐2A during Arctic winter 2019/20Chemical total column ozone loss of 88 DU and 106 DU was derived from TROPOMI satellite observations and the chemical transport modelChemical ozone loss derived from OMPS‐LP satellite data reached 2.1 ppmv (80%) near the 450 K potential temperature level (∼18 km) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We use a three‐dimensional chemical transport model and satellite observations to investigate Arctic ozone depletion in winter/spring 2019/20 and compare with earlier years. Persistently, low temperatures caused extensive chlorine activation through to March. March‐mean polar‐cap‐mean modeled chemical column ozone loss reached 78 DU (local maximum loss of ∼108 DU in the vortex), similar to that in 2011. However, weak dynamical replenishment of only 59 DU from December to March was key to producing very low (<220 DU) column ozone values. The only other winter to exhibit such weak transport in the past 20 years was 2010/11, so this process is fundamental to causing such low ozone values. A model simulation with peak observed stratospheric total chlorine and bromine loading (from the mid‐1990s) shows that gradual recovery of the ozone layer over the past 2 decades ameliorated the polar cap ozone depletion in March 2020 by ∼20 DU. Plain Language Summary: Ozone depletion in the polar stratosphere is caused by chlorine and bromine species which are activated by low temperatures. Chlorine and bromine are transported to the stratosphere following the surface emission of ozone‐depleting substances (ODSs). While springtime ozone depletion in the Antarctic is almost always large, it is much more variable in the Arctic due to warmer temperatures and more disturbed stratospheric dynamics. Using a three‐dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model and satellite observations, we show that the very low ozone columns observed in March 2020 were a consequence of large chemical destruction and weaker‐than‐normal replenishment by transport. These very low ozone levels are, by some measures, record values despite 2 decades of decreasing stratospheric chlorine and bromine through controls of the Montreal Protocol. Had the meteorology of 2019/20 occurred 2 decades ago, the ozone loss would have been notably larger. The Arctic stratospheric dynamics for 2019/20 are extreme relative to the past 2 decades but fit a compact relationship that links column ozone variations over Arctic and Antarctic winters. Key Points: Large mean Arctic (>63°N) chemical ozone destruction in 2019/20 of 78 DU, similar to other extreme cold winters in the past 2 decadesAnomalously weak wintertime dynamical replenishment of only ∼60 DU contributed strongly to the very low observed ozone column in MarchOzone recovery caused 20 DU less mean Arctic ozone loss in March 2020 than would have occurred with stratospheric halogens at 1995 levels [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Very short‐lived substances (VSLS), including dichloromethane (CH2Cl2), chloroform (CHCl3), perchloroethylene (C2Cl4), and 1,2‐dichloroethane (C2H4Cl2), are a stratospheric chlorine source and therefore contribute to ozone depletion. We quantify stratospheric chlorine trends from these VSLS (VSLCltot) using a chemical transport model and atmospheric measurements, including novel high‐altitude aircraft data from the NASA VIRGAS (2015) and POSIDON (2016) missions. We estimate VSLCltot increased from 69 (±14) parts per trillion (ppt) Cl in 2000 to 111 (±22) ppt Cl in 2017, with >80% delivered to the stratosphere through source gas injection, and the remainder from product gases. The modeled evolution of chlorine source gas injection agrees well with historical aircraft data, which corroborate reported surface CH2Cl2 increases since the mid‐2000s. The relative contribution of VSLS to total stratospheric chlorine increased from ~2% in 2000 to ~3.4% in 2017, reflecting both VSLS growth and decreases in long‐lived halocarbons. We derive a mean VSLCltot growth rate of 3.8 (±0.3) ppt Cl/year between 2004 and 2017, though year‐to‐year growth rates are variable and were small or negative in the period 2015–2017. Whether this is a transient effect, or longer‐term stabilization, requires monitoring. In the upper stratosphere, the modeled rate of HCl decline (2004–2017) is −5.2% per decade with VSLS included, in good agreement to ACE satellite data (−4.8% per decade), and 15% slower than a model simulation without VSLS. Thus, VSLS have offset a portion of stratospheric chlorine reductions since the mid‐2000s. Plain Language Summary: It is well established that long‐lived halogen‐containing compounds of anthropogenic origin, such as chlorofluorocarbons, have led to depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer. As production of these compounds is now controlled by the Montreal Protocol, the atmospheric abundance of chlorine/bromine is in decline, and the ozone layer should "recover" in coming decades. Here we consider the contribution of Very Short‐Lived Substances to stratospheric chlorine. These compounds also have anthropogenic sources, though are much less efficient at destroying ozone compared to, for example, most chlorofluorocarbons (per molecule emitted) as they break down more readily close to Earth's surface. Using surface observations and atmospheric model simulations, we show that stratospheric chlorine from short‐lived substances has increased since the early 2000s. This increase is also apparent from airborne measurements of their atmospheric abundance over the same period. Using the model in conjunction with satellite estimates of stratospheric chlorine, we show rising levels of short‐lived substances may be causing upper stratospheric chlorine to decline at a slower rate relative to what would be expected in their absence. While this offset in the rate of chlorine decline is modest (15%), it is nonnegligible and should be considered in the analysis of stratospheric composition trends. Key Points: Stratospheric chlorine from very short‐lived substances increased by 3.8 ppt/year over 2004–2017, with a growth slowdown in 2015–2017Chlorine from short‐lived substances improves model representation of upper stratospheric HCl trendsShort‐lived chlorine offsets the 2004–2017 rate of upper stratospheric HCl decline by 15% [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The radiative forcing caused by a volcanic eruption is dependent on several eruption source parameters such as the mass of sulfur dioxide (SO2) emitted, the eruption column height, and the eruption latitude. General circulation models with prognostic aerosol and chemistry schemes can be used to investigate how each parameter influences the volcanic forcing. However, the range of multidimensional parameter space that can be explored is restricted because such simulations are computationally expensive. Here we use statistical emulation to explore the radiative impact of eruptions over a wide covarying range of SO2 emission magnitudes, injection heights, and eruption latitudes based on only 30 simulations. We use the emulators to build response surfaces to visualize and predict the sulfate aerosol e‐folding decay time, the stratospheric aerosol optical depth, and net radiative forcing of thousands of different eruptions. We find that the volcanic stratospheric aerosol optical depth and net radiative forcing are primarily determined by the mass of SO2 emitted, but eruption latitude is the most important parameter in determining the sulfate aerosol e‐folding decay time. The response surfaces reveal joint effects of the eruption source parameters in influencing the net radiative forcing, such as a stronger influence of injection height for tropical eruptions than high‐latitude eruptions. We also demonstrate how the emulated response surfaces can be used to find all combinations of eruption source parameters that produce a particular volcanic response, often revealing multiple solutions. Key Points: We demonstrate the feasibility and value of using statistical emulation to quantify the radiative impact of volcanic eruptionsEmulated response surfaces illustrate the dependencies of model output such as net radiative forcing on eruption source parametersEmulated response surfaces can also be used to constrain the eruption source parameters for a particular volcanic response [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]