Search

Mucosal malignant melanoma (MMM) is a rare subtype of malignant melanoma with a more aggressive biological behavior than cutaneous melanoma (CM). Owing to its rarity, it is necessary to accumulate information on treatments, especially in Asians, in whom MMM occurs more frequently than in Caucasians. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) of nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy (NIVO+IPI) versus immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy (PD-1) in Japanese patients with MMM. We reviewed patients with advanced or recurrent MMM who received ICIs as first-line systematic therapy between February 2012 and February 2024 at the Shizuoka Cancer Center. We enrolled a total of 57 patients: 10 (17.5%) were treated with NIVO+IPI, and 47 (82.5%) were treated with PD-1 as first-line systemic therapy. Objective response rates (ORR) did not differ significantly between the NIVO+IPI and PD-1 groups (40.0% vs 27.7%; p = 0.176). There was also no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) (median PFS time: 4.3 months vs 9.9 months, log-rank test, p = 0.578) or overall survival (OS) (median OS time: 33.1 months vs. 22.8 months, log-rank test, p = 0.697) between the two groups. However, regarding AEs, grade ≥3 AEs leading to discontinuation of first-line treatment occurred in 80% of patients in the NIVO+IPI group and in 22.6% of patients in the PD-1 group (p = 0.002). No difference was found in the efficacy of NIVO+IPI therapy and anti-PD-1 antibody monotherapy as the first-line treatment for MMM in Japanese patients, but an increase in AEs was observed with combination therapy. This study suggests that patients with MMM may receive less benefit from NIVO+IPI than from PD-1., (© 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Although malignant melanoma is relatively rare in Japan, it is often diagnosed at a later stage than in Western countries. Nivolumab and ipilimumab are immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed death 1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, respectively. Owing to their complementary anticancer effects, nivolumab and ipilimumab combination therapy (N + I) has been studied and approved for treating malignant melanoma in various countries including Japan. Real-world postmarketing surveillance was implemented to record treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) in patients treated with N + I following its approval in Japan. Patients were eligible for registration if they had unresectable malignant melanoma and started N + I between September 2018 and August 2019. The observation period was 13 weeks from starting N + I. Only safety information was collected and evaluated. The final case report form lock was March 2021. Overall, 173 patients (median age, 66.0 years; performance status 0-1, 88.4%; skin: 53.2%; mucosal: 32.4%) were eligible for the analyses. Overall, 34.1% of patients completed 4 doses of N + I. N + I was discontinued by 63.0% (due to adverse events in 67.9% and disease progression/death in 22.9%). Any grade and grade ≥3 TRAEs were reported in 73.41% and 52.02%, respectively. TRAEs in ≥10 patients were hepatic function abnormal (any grade/grade ≥3: 23.12%/13.29%), pyrexia (10.40%/0.58%), diarrhea (9.25%/2.89%), rash (8.67%/0.58%), hypophysitis (5.78%/5.20%), interstitial lung disease (5.78%/2.89%), and liver disorder (5.78%/4.62%). TRAEs were classified as recovered (36.99% of patients), recovering (44.51%), unrecovered (13.29%), recovered with sequelae (2.31%), and death (1.73%). Overall, 24 of 34 patients (70.59%) with gastrointestinal-related and 53 of 65 (81.54%) liver-related TRAEs received treatment, such as a steroid with/without an immunosuppressant; most patients recovered within 1 to 2 months. In conclusion, this postmarketing surveillance of N + I in patients with unresectable malignant melanoma revealed no new safety concerns compared with results of prior studies. Immune-related TRAEs were generally manageable by appropriate treatment including a steroid., (© 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

The efficacy and safety of nivolumab and ipilimumab (N + I) combination therapy for Japanese patients with advanced unresectable melanoma was re-evaluated in clinical practice. One hundred Japanese patients with advanced melanoma were included. The overall response rate was 24%; complete response (CR), 6%; partial response, 18%. The response rates were 33.3% in the systemic therapy-naïve and 15.4% in the prior-treatment groups, and 16.1% for patients who were treated with first-line anti-programmed death 1 antibody monotherapy followed by second-line N + I therapy after progression of the disease. The response rate for cutaneous melanoma was 32.7%, and 47.8% in the naïve group. Response rates for non-acral, acral, and mucosal melanoma were 34.9%, 25%, and 16.7%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) for all patients was 3.25 months (6.5 and 2.5 months in the naïve and prior-treatment groups, respectively). Median overall survival (OS) was 14.5 months (25.25 and 7.5 months in the naïve and prior-treatment groups, respectively). There were no significant differences in PFS or OS for patients with non-acral, acral, or mucosal melanoma. The 3-year PFS and OS were both 100% in patients who achieved CR with combination therapy. Adverse events occurred in 89% and were grade three or higher in 56% of cases. Although direct comparisons cannot be made due to different patient backgrounds, N + I combination therapy in Japanese patients in clinical practice tended to be inferior when compared to global study and non-Asian patients in clinical practice. The highest response rate was in the cutaneous melanoma therapy-naïve group. The best tumor response was associated with survival outcome, and the PFS and OS were good in cases where CR was obtained. The proportion of grade three and four adverse events was as high as that in the global study., (© 2022 Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Sarcoidosis and sarcoid-like reactions (SLRs) may develop in association with various malignancies, as well as in association to certain oncologic drugs, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). We aimed to perform a narrative review with regard to the development of ICIs-associated sarcoidosis or SLRs, and to discuss the corresponding diagnostic and therapeutic challenges raised in this scenario. Apropos of a melanoma patient developing SLRs while treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab, we searched for clinically evident, ICIs-associated sarcoidosis or SLRs in the English literature. We recorded the oncologic characteristics, including type of malignancy and type of ICI, the phenotypic characteristics of sarcoidosis/SLRs, as well as the impact on immunotherapy. Including our patient, we identified 80 ICIs-associated sarcoidosis or SLRs cases. Both sexes were equally affected (40 F/40 M) and the most common malignancy was melanoma (65/80, 81.3%). Concerning the oncologic treatment, there was a predilection for pembrolizumab (23/80, 28.7%), followed by the ipilimumab/nivolumab combination (21/80, 26.3%), ipilimumab (18/80, 22.5%), nivolumab (16/80, 20.0%). Although in the majority of the cases (52/80, 65.0%) there was no need for systemic prednisolone for the management of sarcoidosis, a significant proportion of patients finally discontinued ICIs treatment (44/80, 55.0%). Phenotypically, sarcoidosis and SLRs highly imitate oncologic progression posing diagnostic difficulties. A therapeutic dilemma is also raised when there is a need for systemic prednisolone, since the latter may jeopardize the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapy. Sarcoidosis and SLRs, though rare, can present in oncologic patients treated with ICIs. Clinicians should be aware of this possibility and the related diagnostic and therapeutic challenges they have to face in this scenario., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

The efficacy and safety of nivolumab + ipilimumab combination therapy were retrospectively examined in Japanese patients with unresectable advanced melanoma in clinical practice. Fifty-seven patients with advanced melanoma received the nivolumab + ipilimumab combination therapy. The primary site was cutaneous, mucosal, uveal and unknown in 35, 16, two and four patients, respectively. The overall response rate was 26.3%, with complete response observed in two (3.5%) patients, partial response in 13 (22.8%), stable disease in 12 (21.1%) and progressive disease in 30 (52.6%). The response rate in the treatment-naive and prior systemic therapy group was 40.7% and 13.3%, respectively. For those treated with a single immune checkpoint inhibitor followed by the nivolumab + ipilimumab combination therapy as second-line therapy after disease progression, the response rate was 18.8%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in all patients was 3.3 and 14 months, respectively. Median PFS in the treatment-naive and prior systemic therapy groups was 13 and 2 months, respectively. Median OS was unreached in the treatment-naive group and was 6.3 months in prior systemic therapy groups. There was no significant difference in PFS and OS for non-acral, acral and mucosal melanoma. Adverse events occurred in 86% of patients; 56.1% were grade 3 or worse. The response rate in an actual clinical setting, including the prior systemic therapy group, was lower than that in the global study and the Japanese phase II study. However, in the treatment-naive group, the rate was equivalent to that in the Japanese phase II study. PFS and OS in the treatment-naive group were comparable with those in the global study and Japanese phase II study, suggesting that the treatment was effective. The proportion of grade 3 and 4 immune-related adverse events was as high as that in the global study and Japanese phase II study., (© 2020 Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination is currently one of the preferred regimens for advanced melanoma in recently updated clinical practice guidelines. However, the evidence on the efficacy of the combination for acral or mucosal subtypes remains less robust. This is the final analysis of a multicenter, open-label, uncontrolled phase II study that investigated the long-term efficacy and safety in treatment-naive Japanese patients with advanced melanoma, including acral or mucosal subtypes, and subsequent therapy after discontinuation of the investigational agents. Patients received four doses of nivolumab (1 mg/kg i.v.) in combination with ipilimumab (3 mg/kg i.v.) at 3-week intervals, followed by doses of nivolumab (3 mg/kg i.v.) at 2-week intervals. The median follow-up period was 20.8 months (range, 5.2-35.0). The centrally and locally assessed objective response rates were both 43.3% (13/30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 25.5-62.6). Median progression-free survival was not reached (95% CI, 3.02-not reached), and median overall survival was also not reached (95% CI, 19.52-not reached). The 30-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 50.3% and 54.2%, respectively. No new safety concerns were detected. After discontinuation of the investigational agents, 83.3% of patients received some form of subsequent therapy including 43.3% of patients who received nivolumab monotherapy and 26.7% of patients who received radiotherapy. Of the four patients who discontinued the investigational agents because of immune-related adverse events, two received subsequent therapy (nivolumab and ipilimumab, respectively) and the other two showed long-term treatment-free survival (659 and 590 days, respectively). Long-term survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab was observed in Japanese patients with melanoma including acral and mucosal subtypes, which is consistent with the CheckMate 067 study. Many patients continued to receive some form of treatment safely after stopping treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab., (© 2020 The Authors. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors has improved prognosis among patients with cutaneous melanoma, but there are still unmet medical needs in Japan, especially for mucosal melanoma and acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) subtypes. Ipilimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 and potentiates antitumor T-cell response, was approved in Japan in 2015 for the treatment of radically unresectable malignant melanoma. This postmarketing surveillance (prospective, non-interventional, multicenter, observational study) evaluated the safety (occurrence of adverse drug reactions [ADR]) and efficacy (overall survival [OS]) of ipilimumab in a real-world setting in Japan. All patients with radically unresectable malignant melanoma undergoing treatment with ipilimumab in Japan during the registration period between August 2015 and February 2017 were enrolled. In total, 547 patients were analyzed; 67.5% were 60 years old or more, 85.7% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, 50.3% had melanoma of the skin (mainly of the ALM subtype) and 73.5% had negative BRAF mutation status. Most patients had experienced recurrence and received multiple treatments. The overall incidence of ADR and serious ADR was 69.5% and 40.8%, respectively. The most common ADR and serious ADR were liver disorder, colitis and diarrhea. The most common ADR of special interest were liver-related ADR (22.5%), skin-related ADR (22.1%), gastrointestinal-related ADR (20.3%) and endocrine system-related ADR (16.3%). Most of these events had recovered or were in remission by the last evaluation. The median OS was 7.52 months (95% confidence interval, 6.47-8.74). Median OS was 6.31 and 8.44 months in patients with mucosal melanoma and melanoma of the skin; 9.43 and 3.75 months in patients with and without ADR; and 10.32 and 6.11 months in patients with and without serious ADR, respectively. Ipilimumab was tolerable and showed efficacy in improving OS for these patients., (© 2020 The Authors. The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Combination therapy with nivolumab + ipilimumab was recently approved for treating unresectable cases of malignant melanoma. In spite of the high response rate, it is associated with a high incidence of serious adverse events, including immune-related hemophagocytic syndrome/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (irHPS/HLH), a difficult to diagnose rare disease. This is the first report of this disease in an Asian malignant melanoma patient treated with nivolumab + ipilimumab. A 69-year-old Japanese woman with unresectable malignant melanoma was treated with nivolumab + ipilimumab. Following the combined therapy, her fever and symptoms of malaise occurred, and she visited to our hospital's emergency department. Blood tests revealed significant liver dysfunction, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. We suspected irHPS/HLH, based on tests revealing decreased fibrinogen and significantly increased ferritin. Bone marrow biopsy revealed numerous macrophages and high hemophagocytosis levels. After 50 mg prednisolone (1 mg/kg per day) was administered, fever and cytopenia markedly improved. irHPS/HLH has a high rate of coagulation abnormalities accompanied by hypertriglyceridemia and hypofibrinogenemia, which are unlikely to occur in adult HPS/HLHs. Because irHPS/HLH responds better to steroids than other secondary HPS/HLHs, we expect a complete cure with steroids. Quick diagnosis and appropriate treatment based on clinical symptoms and laboratory tests are needed in suspected cases., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Melanoma is one of the most serious form of skin cancer. Nowadays, ipilimumab is used for advanced melanoma refractory to first-line anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies. Thirty patients (male : female ratio, 18:12; median age, 60.5 years) sequentially treated with ipilimumab after anti-PD-1 antibody (nivolumab or pembrolizumab), while 58 (male : female ratio, 27:31; median age, 66.5 years) with anti-PD-1 antibody only. The kind of therapy and schedules were as follows: nivolumab, 2 mg/kg at 3-week intervals or at 3 mg/kg every 2 week; pembrolizumab, 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks; ipilimumab, 3 mg/kg at 3-week intervals for four doses. The sequential therapy was selected for the patients with disease progression and/or recovered from severe (immune-related [ir]) adverse events (AE) after PD-1 blockade monotherapy. We evaluated multiple parameters and analyzed their relevance to overall survival (OS). The best objective response rate was 6.7% in sequential ipilimumab treatment. Median OS was 163 days (range, 16-489). Baseline absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and performance status (PS) before sequential ipilimumab were associated with OS in univariate analyses. Baseline PS and irAE within 6 weeks after ipilimumab administration showed significant differences on multivariate analysis. Prior to first-line PD-1 blockade, these parameters were not associated with OS. The other factors (i.e. age, sex, number of doses, absolute neutrophil counts, neutrophil : lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase and C-reactive protein) were not associated with OS. [Correction added on 17 April 2019, after first online publication: 'not related to OS' has been amended to 'not associated with OS'.] Ipilimumab as sequential therapy did not appear to improve OS and was associated with more severe irAE than PD-1 blockade monotherapy. We need to carefully consider treating patients with poor PS and low ALC., (© 2019 Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Study Objective: Ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab are checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) that activate T-cell-mediated immune response. CPI can provide durable benefits to some cancer patients with melanoma, renal cell cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, or a growing list of other cancers. However, CPI treatment is also associated with adverse immune-mediated reactions (IMRs) that can be life-threatening. This pharmacovigilance analysis aims to characterize IMR signals in relation to CPI treatment., Design: Retrospective pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis., Data Source: U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS)., Measurements and Main Results: Adverse event reports submitted to FAERS between 2011 and 2015 were analyzed. CPIs were identified by generic names, and IMRs were identified by MedDRA Preferred Terms. Empirical Bayes geometric means with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (EB05-EB95) were calculated as CPI-IMR association metrics. Signals were defined as metrics with EB05 ≥ 2.0. Overall, 1,018 IMR events were submitted for CPIs, corresponding to 76% for ipilimumab, 15% for nivolumab, and 9% for pembrolizumab. The period of data collection precluded data on the most recently approved CPI agents. IMRs consisted of 51% colitis, 16% endocrinopathies, 12% pneumonitis, 11% hepatitis, 4% infusion-related reactions, 3% nephritis, and 3% other IMRs. Colitis contributed to 63% and 41% of IMRs for ipilimumab and nivolumab, respectively. Pneumonitis and hepatitis contributed to a majority of IMRs for pembrolizumab, for which nephritis and infusion-related reactions were not reported. Signals of IMRs were detected for CPIs as a class (EB05 = 12.4) and individual agents: ipilimumab (EB05 = 13.2), nivolumab (EB05 = 15.0), and pembrolizumab (EB05 = 7.3). Colitis and pneumonitis had the strongest signals for CPIs (EB05 = 45.6 and EB05 = 17.6, respectively). Colitis was the strongest signal for ipilimumab (EB05 = 54.2), and pneumonitis was the strongest signal for nivolumab (EB05 = 48.0) and pembrolizumab (EB05 = 21.8)., Conclusion: Cancer immunotherapy with CPIs is associated with a multitude of IMRs, especially colitis and pneumonitis. Individual CPIs had variable IMR signals, and pharmacoepidemiologic studies are required to evaluate the identified signals., (© 2017 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)