Search

Aims: Despite terizidone being part of the second-line recommended drugs for treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), information on its pharmacokinetics is scarce. The aim of this study was to describe the steady-state population pharmacokinetics (PPK) of terizidone and its primary metabolite cycloserine in patients with DR-TB and determine the effect of patient characteristics., Methods: This clinical study involved 39 adult DR-TB patients admitted to Brewelskloof Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa for intensive treatment phase. Blood samples were collected at predose and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 3.5, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours after drug administration. The estimation of PPK parameters was performed using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling software Monolix 2018R1. Free-fat mass was used to perform allometric scaling on disposition parameters., Results: A 1-compartment model best described the pharmacokinetics of terizidone and cycloserine. A modified transit compartment model described the absorption of terizidone. The parameters of terizidone model were mean transit time (1.7 h), absorption rate constant (2.97 h -1 ), apparent volume of distribution (Vp/F: 13.4 L) and apparent total clearance (0.51 L h -1 ). In the joint model, apparent fraction of terizidone converted to cycloserine was 0.29 while apparent clearance of terizidone via other routes and apparent cycloserine clearance was 0.1 L h -1 and 2.94 L h -1 , respectively. Serum albumin had significant effect on Vp/F., Conclusions: The developed PPK model described well the concentration-time profile for terizidone and cycloserine in DR-TB patients. High albumin concentration was associated with low Vp/F., (© 2019 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: This study assessed non-inferiority of parecoxib vs. combination parecoxib+propacetamol and compared the opioid-sparing effects of parecoxib, propacetamol, and parecoxib+propacetamol vs. placebo after total hip arthroplasty., Methods: In this randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority study, patients received one of four IV treatments after surgery: parecoxib 40 mg bid (n = 72); propacetamol 2 g qid (n = 71); parecoxib 40 mg bid plus propacetamol 2 g qid (n = 72); or placebo (n = 38) with supplemental IV patient-controlled analgesia (morphine). Patients and investigators were blinded to treatment. Pain intensity at rest and with movement was assessed regularly, together with functional recovery (modified Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form) and opioid-related side effects (Opioid-Related Symptom Distress Scale) questionnaires up to 48 h., Results: After 24 h, cumulative morphine consumption was reduced by 59.8% (P < 0.001), 38.9% (P < 0.001), and 26.8% (P = 0.005) in the parecoxib+propacetamol, parecoxib, and propacetamol groups, respectively, compared with placebo. Parecoxib did not meet criteria for non-inferiority to parecoxib+propacetamol. Parecoxib+propacetamol and parecoxib significantly reduced least-squares mean pain intensity scores at rest and with movement compared with propacetamol (P < 0.05). One day after surgery, parecoxib+propacetamol significantly reduced opioid-related symptom distress and decreased pain interference with function compared with propacetamol or placebo., Conclusion: Parecoxib and parecoxib+propacetamol provided significant opioid-sparing efficacy compared with placebo; non-inferiority of parecoxib to parecoxib+propacetamol was not demonstrated. Opioid-sparing efficacy was accompanied by significant reductions in pain intensity on movement, improved functional outcome, and less opioid-related symptom distress. Study medications were well tolerated., (© 2016 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objectives: To assess the effect and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS) as adjunctive treatment for difficult-to-treat epilepsy in adult Scandinavian patients., Material and Methods: 151 outpatients (mean age: 42.5 years) from 18 centres in Denmark, Sweden and Norway were recruited to the study. 81.5% had focal epilepsy, and the mean number of previously tried AEDs was 4.5. The patients were given ZNS as add-on treatment, and the ZNS dosing and the visit frequency were governed by the treating physician. The primary efficacy endpoint was the retention rate after 12-month treatment. Assessments included also responder rate, type and frequency of adverse events, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and quality of life (QOLIE-31)., Results: 90 patients (59.6%) completed the study. Mean daily ZNS dose was 300.8 mg. After 12 months, 81 patients were still on ZNS, that is a retention rate of 53.6%. The mean reduction of seizure frequency at 12 months was 27%. Best effect was seen in those with focal and those with secondary generalized seizures. In the QOLIE-31, there was a mean increase from baseline of 4.8 points. The tolerability was generally good. The majority of side effects were CNS-related, dizziness, fatigue, seizure aggravation, and headache being most prevalent. 21.2% had adverse events leading to withdrawal of ZNS., Conclusions: A retention rate of 53.6% after 1 year of treatment with ZNS is roughly in accordance with the retention rates found for lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam and topiramate in drug-resistant patients., (© 2015 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

We evaluated weight changes in obese patients at 6-months after they ended participation in a 12-month randomised controlled trial in which they received daily placebo, zonisamide 200 mg or zonisamide 400 mg, in addition to lifestyle counselling. Of the originally randomised 225 patients, 218 completed month-12 when study interventions were discontinued. For the 154 patients who returned for 6-month follow-up off-treatment, weight changes between month-12 and month-18 for placebo (n = 53), zonisamide 200 mg (n = 49) and zonisamide 400 mg groups (n = 52) were 0.5 kg [95% confidence interval (CI), -0.8 to 1.8; 0.7%], 1.5 kg (0.2-2.8; 1.6%; p = 0.26 vs. placebo) and 2.4 kg (1.1-3.7; 2.6%; p = 0.04 vs. placebo), respectively. Our results suggest that although zonisamide 400 mg daily for 12-months resulted in greater weight loss than with placebo, weight regain after discontinuation of interventions was greater in the zonisamide 400 mg group than placebo group., (© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To follow-up patients prescribed paliperidone palmitate long-acting injection (PP) over 1 year to determine factors predicting continuation with PP treatment., Method: Naturalistic observation of patients registered as starting PP in a single healthcare unit in London, UK. Monovariate and multivariate (Cox regression) analysis of factors predicting continuation at 1 year., Results: Data were available for 210 patients consecutively prescribed PP of whom 10 were lost to follow-up. At 1 year, 65% of 200 patients (176 with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder) started on PP were still receiving it. The main reason for discontinuation was perceived ineffectiveness (52% of discontinuers); only 10 subjects (5% of total) discontinued because of adverse effects. Initiation as an out-patient [hazard ratio (HR) 0.39, 95%CI, 0.20, 0.67, P = 0.001]; being switched from risperidone (HR 0.56, 95%CI 0.32, 0.94, P = 0.026) and correct initiation (HR 0.56, 95%CI 0.34, 0.93, P = 0.024) were significantly associated with a lower likelihood of discontinuation., Conclusion: Paliperidone palmitate was effective and well tolerated in this naturalistic cohort. Optimising treatment by targeting PP for patients identified as having lower risk of discontinuation can give rise to continuation rates approaching 80% at 1 year., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Numerous pre-clinical studies have implicated endothelin-1 in the pathogenesis of diabetic and non-diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Renal endothelin-1 production is almost universally increased in kidney disease. The pathologic effects of endothelin-1, including vasoconstriction, proteinuria, inflammation, cellular injury and fibrosis, are likely mediated by the endothelin A (ETA) receptor. ETA antagonism alone, and/or combined ETA/B blockade, reduces CKD progression. Based on the strong pre-clinical data, several clinical trials using ETA antagonists were conducted. Small trials involving acute intravenous endothelin receptor blockade suggest that ETA, but not ETB, blockade exerts protective renal and vascular effects in CKD patients. A large phase 3 trial (ASCEND) examined the effects of avosentan, an endothelin receptor antagonist, on renal disease progression in diabetic nephropathy. Proteinuria was reduced after 3-6 months of treatment. However the study was terminated due to increased morbidity and mortality associated with avosentan-induced fluid retention. Several phase 2 trials using avosentan at lower doses than in ASCEND, atrasentan or sitaxsentan (the latter two being highly ETA-selective) showed reductions in proteinuria on top of renin-angiotensin system blockade. Infrequent and clinically insignificant fluid retention was observed at the most effective doses. Additional trials using ETA blockers are ongoing or being planned in patients with diabetic nephropathy or focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Moving forward, such studies must be conducted with careful patient selection and attention to dosing in order to minimize adverse side effects. Nonetheless, there is cause for optimism that this class of agents will ultimately prove to be effective for the treatment of CKD., (© 2012 The Authors. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology © 2012 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90; HSP90AA1) is a molecular chaperone involved in signalling pathways for cell proliferation, survival, and cellular adaptation. Inhibitors of HSP90 are being examined as anti-cancer agents, but the critical molecular mechanism(s) of their activity remains unresolved. HSP90 inhibition potentially facilitates the simultaneous targeting of multiple molecules within tumour cells and represents an attractive therapeutic proposition. Here, we investigated HSP90 as a molecular target for acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) using the novel HSP90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922-AG. NVP-AUY922-AG induced dose-dependent killing in myeloid cell lines and primary AML blasts. In primary blasts, cell death in response to NVP-AUY922-AG was seen at concentrations almost 2 logs lower than cytarabine (Ara-C) (50% lethal dose = 0·12 μ mol/l ± 0·28). NVP-AUY922-AG was significantly less toxic to normal bone marrow (P = 0·02). In vitro response to NVP-AUY922-AG did not correlate with response to Ara-C (r(2) = 0·0006). NVP-AUY922-AG was highly synergistic with Ara-C in cell lines and in 20/25 of the primary samples tested. NVP-AUY922-AG induced increases in HSP70 expression and depletion of total AKT, IKKα and IKKβ in cell lines and primary blasts. This study shows that the novel HSP90 inhibitor NVP-AUY922-AG has significant single agent activity in AML cells and is synergistic with Ara-C., (© 2013 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Background: Selective metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5) antagonists inhibit transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) in animals and acid reflux in humans., Aim: To assess the effect of single doses of the mGluR5 antagonist AZD2066 on TLESRs and reflux in humans., Methods: Healthy male volunteers received AZD2066 13 mg and placebo (part A), or AZD2066 2 mg and AZD2066 6 mg and placebo (part B), in a randomised crossover study. Postprandial manometry/pH-impedance measurements were taken after each dose., Results: A total of 13 individuals completed part A of the study and 19 individuals completed part B. There was a significant reduction in the geometric mean number of TLESRs (27%; P = 0.02) and the geometric mean number of reflux episodes (51%; P = 0.01) in subjects receiving AZD2066 13 mg compared with placebo. Adverse events in participants receiving AZD2066 13 mg were mostly related to the nervous system [dizziness (3/13); disturbance in attention (3/13)]. Adverse events were reversible and of mild intensity. There were no serious adverse events. The effects of AZD2066 appeared dose-dependent, with smaller reductions in TLESRs and reflux episodes (relative to placebo) and fewer adverse events observed for AZD2066 2 mg and AZD2066 6 mg compared with AZD2066 13 mg., Conclusion: The mGluR5-mediated inhibition of TLESRs may be a useful approach for inhibiting gastro-oesophageal reflux., (© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Background: Many studies have demonstrated that either COX-2 antagonists or glucocorticoids are efficient analgesics after orthopaedic surgery. We wanted to evaluate if the combination of these two drugs was better than one drug alone when added to paracetamol, local anaesthesia, and cryo-cuff for outpatient anterior crucial ligament (ACL) surgery., Methods: In a double-blind design, 89 adult patients scheduled for day-case ACL repair in general anaesthesia were randomly assigned into three groups: The COXIB group (n = 30) received either 40 mg parecoxib iv or 120 mg etoricoxib orally 1 h before surgery. The STEROID group (n = 30) received 8 mg dexamethasone iv, and the combination group (Group COMBI, n = 29) received both., Results: At 24 h, Group COMBI had significantly lower visual analogue scale (0-10 cm) scores during rest (2.1 ± 1.3) (mean ± standard deviation) and movement (4.2 ± 2.5) when compared to both the COXIB group (P = 0.04) and the STEROID group (P = 0.035). The accumulated consumption of rescue opioids (5.2 ± 4,5 mg morphine) was also significantly lower at 24 h compared to the other groups (P = 0.02). Mean time to discharge from hospital was about 3 h in all groups. The pain scores in the post-anaesthetic care unit, mobilization at 24 h and 7 days, and general level of satisfaction were similar between the groups., Conclusion: The combination of a COX-2 inhibitor and dexamethasone results in better pain relief 24 h after surgery in patients undergoing outpatient ACL surgery, compared to COX-2 inhibitor alone or dexamethasone alone. With a dedicated multimodal pain regime, most ACL patients may be discharged within 3 h., (© 2011 The Authors Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica © 2011 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.)

Objective: In preclinical reproductive studies, leflunomide was found to be embryotoxic and teratogenic. Women treated with leflunomide are advised to avoid pregnancy; those who become pregnant are advised to reduce fetal exposure through a cholestyramine drug elimination procedure. The present study was undertaken to investigate pregnancy outcomes in women who received leflunomide and were treated with cholestyramine during pregnancy., Methods: Sixty-four pregnant women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were treated with leflunomide during pregnancy (95.3% of whom received cholestyramine), 108 pregnant women with RA not treated with leflunomide, and 78 healthy pregnant women were enrolled in a prospective cohort study between 1999 and 2009. Information was collected via interview of the mothers, review of medical records, and specialized physical examination of infants., Results: There were no significant differences in the overall rate of major structural defects in the exposed group (3 of 56 live births [5.4%]) relative to either comparison group (each 4.2%)(P = 0.13). The rate was similar to the 3-4% expected in the general population. There was no specific pattern of major or minor anomalies. Infants in both the leflunomide-exposed and non-leflunomide-exposed RA groups were born smaller and earlier relative to infants of healthy mothers; however, after adjustment for confounding factors, there were no significant differences between the leflunomide-exposed and non-leflunomide-exposed RA groups., Conclusion: Although the sample size is small, these data do not support the notion that there is a substantial increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes due to leflunomide exposure among women who undergo cholestyramine elimination procedure early in pregnancy. These findings can provide some reassurance to women who inadvertently become pregnant while taking leflunomide and undergo the washout procedure.

Aim: Effective early and persistent antipsychotic treatment in recently diagnosed schizophrenia may positively impact long-term outcomes. Paliperidone extended-release (ER) was assessed in this population., Methods: Post hoc analysis of pooled data from three 6-week, double-blind (DB), placebo-controlled, and three 1-year open-label (OL) studies of paliperidone ER in schizophrenia patients. Data stratified by time since diagnosis (< or =3 vs. >3 years)., Results: At DB (n = 1193) and OL baselines (n = 744), 259 (21.9%) and 188 (25.3%) patients were diagnosed < or =3 years. At DB end point, both populations improved with paliperidone ER versus placebo on Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) total, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity and Personal and Social Performance (PSP) scale scores (all P < 0.05). At OL end point, there were significant improvements from DB baseline in both populations on these scales (P < 0.0001), with greater improvement in the < or =3-year population on PANSS total (P < 0.001) and PSP (P < 0.001) scores. During DB treatment, only the < or =3-year population reported adverse events (AEs) in > or =5% (placebo-adjusted rate) of subjects receiving paliperidone ER: akathisia, extrapyramidal disorder not otherwise specified and somnolence. During OL treatment, akathisia and somnolence occurred more frequently (> or =5%) in the < or =3- versus >3-year population. OL study completion rates were 51.1% in < or =3-year, and 48.2% in >3-year subjects., Conclusions: Paliperidone ER significantly improved symptoms and functioning in schizophrenia patients, regardless of time since diagnosis. Recently diagnosed patients who continued treatment exhibited greater symptom reduction and functional benefit over the long term. Results also suggest that these patients may be more susceptible to certain AEs.

What Is Already Known About This Subject: Body sway increases in older adults and may lead to an increase in the risk of falling. The problem of impaired stability in the elderly may be compounded by the use of hypnotics, which have been associated with an increased risk of next-day falls as well as drowsiness. The potential adverse effects of hypnotic drugs on steadiness may be exacerbated during the night, in the event that an individual needs to get out of bed., What This Study Adds: This study examines the effects of gaboxadol (an investigational treatment for insomnia), zolpidem (a current hypnotic included as an active control) and placebo on body sway and attention/information processing ability following bedtime dosing in elderly subjects who were woken during the night for assessments. Zolpidem and gaboxadol increased body sway at various time points during the night relative to placebo; at 1.5 h post dose, the time of peak concentrations of both drugs, gaboxadol produced less impairment than zolpidem. Compared with placebo, neither gaboxadol nor zolpidem impaired attention/information-processing ability as assessed by critical flicker fusion., Aims: To evaluate tolerability, pharmacokinetics and night-time effects on body sway and critical flicker fusion (CFF) of gaboxadol following bedtime dosing in healthy elderly subjects., Methods: Subjects (17 women, seven men) aged 65-75 years received gaboxadol 10 mg, zolpidem 5 mg (active control) or placebo at 22.00 h in a three-period, randomized, double-blind crossover study. They were awakened during the night for evaluation of body sway and CFF. Pharmacokinetics of gaboxadol were assessed during a fourth single-blind treatment period. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study., Results: The number of subjects with adverse events was 14 for gaboxadol 10 mg, seven for zolpidem and nine for placebo; most were mild or moderate in intensity. Two women discontinued the study following gaboxadol; one vomited and one experienced a severe vasovagal syncope after venepuncture. Mean gaboxadol t(max) was 2 h, t((1/2)) was 1.7 h, AUC(0-infinity) was 430 ng.h ml(-1) and C(max) was 139 ng ml(-1). At 1.5 h and 4 h post dose, zolpidem increased body sway relative to placebo (P < 0.01). Gaboxadol increased body sway at 4 h (P < 0.001) and 8 h (P < 0.05) relative to placebo. At 1.5 h, the time point closest to peak drug concentrations, zolpidem increased body sway compared with gaboxadol (P < 0.01). Gaboxadol and zolpidem had no effects on CFF vs. placebo., Conclusions: A bedtime dose of gaboxadol 10 mg was generally well tolerated. Changes in body sway at 1.5 h after bedtime dosing were smaller with gaboxadol 10 mg than with zolpidem 5 mg, whereas changes were similar at 4 h for both treatments and returned to near baseline at 8 h.

Objectives: To investigate whether zonisamide remains effective and well tolerated in the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy during long-term treatment and with flexible dosing in clinical practice., Materials and Methods: Patients with refractory partial epilepsy who completed a fixed-dose, randomized, double-blind clinical trial were recruited in an open-label extension study with adjustment of zonisamide and other antiepileptic drug dosage according to the treating physician's usual clinical practice., Results: An intention-to-treat analysis of 317 patients showed that zonisamide was well tolerated with a predictable safety profile. Patient retention rates at 1, 2 and 3 years were 65.3%, 44.5% and 28.8%, respectively. Zonisamide treatment was associated with a maintained reduction in seizure frequency, with some patients achieving prolonged periods of seizure freedom., Conclusions: Flexible dosing with zonisamide demonstrated a good safety profile and sustained efficacy in the long-term adjunctive treatment of refractory partial epilepsy.

Background: Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCC) is multifactorial. Effective post-operative pain control is necessary in LCC performed as day-case surgery. We studied the efficacy of paracetamol or valdecoxib with or without dexamethasone after LCC., Methods: One hundred sixty patients were randomized to four groups of 40 patients. Groups 1 and 3 received parecoxib 40 mg intravenously (IV) during surgery and valdecoxib 40 mg x 1 per os (PO) for 7 post-operative days. Groups 2 and 4 received paracetamol 1 g x 4 IV during surgery and 1 g x 4 PO for 7 days. In addition, Groups 3 and 4 were given dexamethasone 10 mg IV intra-operatively. Propofol and remifentanil were used during surgery. The patients were given oxycodone 0.05 mg/kg IV in phase 1 post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU 1) or 0.15 mg/kg PO in phase 2 post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU 2) as needed to keep visual analogue scale <3/10. The patients were supplied with the study drugs for 7 post-operative days., Results: Pain intensity, nausea and the need of oxycodone in phase 1 PACU were similar in all groups. Dexamethasone reduced the need of oral oxycodone in phase 2 PACU (7.0 +/- 1.0 mg vs. 9.1 +/- 1.0 mg, P<0.05). Pain intensity was similar in all groups at home. More patients in the parecoxib/valdecoxib groups needed rescue medication on the 1st post-operative day (P<0.001) than paracetamol-treated patients., Conclusion: Paracetamol was as effective as parecoxib/valdecoxib for pain after LCC. Dexamethasone decreased the need of oxycodone in phase 2 PACU. The effect of dexamethasone was similar in paracetamol and parecoxib/valdecoxib patients.

Aims: To examine whether modulation of paracellular solute permeability affects the capability of the duodenum to adjust luminal osmolality., Methods: Proximal duodenum was perfused with a hypotonic NaCl solution and effects on paracellular permeability to (51)Cr-EDTA, motility, anion secretion, net fluid flux and perfusate osmolality determined in anaesthetized rats in the absence and presence of the COX-2 inhibitor parecoxib. Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) was used to reduce and lidocaine to augment the hypotonicity-induced increase in paracellular permeability., Results: Luminal hypotonicity slightly increased paracellular permeability in control animals. Parecoxib induced motility, increased electrolyte and fluid secretion, potentiated the hypotonicity-induced rise in paracellular permeability and enhanced the capability to adjust luminal osmolality. VIP, given to control animals stimulated electrolyte and fluid secretion and augmented the capability to adjust luminal osmolality. Administration of VIP to parecoxib-treated animals increased secretion further, markedly reduced the hypotonicity-induced increase in permeability but did not change the osmolality-adjusting capability. Luminal lidocaine potentiated the hypotonicity-induced increase in permeability, reduced the hypotonicity-induced net fluid absorption and the osmolality-adjusting capability was 50% greater than in controls. Lidocaine, given to parecoxib-treated animals potentiated the hypotonicity-induced increase in permeability, reduced the hypotonicity-induced net fluid absorption but did not change the osmolality-adjusting capability., Conclusions: Vasoactive intestinal peptide reduces the osmolality-adjusting capacity of the duodenum by inhibiting paracellular solute permeability but improves this capacity by stimulating active electrolyte and fluid secretion. In contrast, lidocaine improves the osmolality-adjusting capability by augmenting paracellular solute transport but depresses it by reducing the hypotonicity-induced net fluid absorption.

Background: The cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor, parecoxib, can be administered parenterally. The recommended dose for post-operative use is 40 mg twice daily, which may not be the appropriate dose for the treatment of visceral pain. We studied the effect of a single dose of parecoxib of either 40 or 80 mg in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and its effect on opioid-induced side-effects., Methods: Seventy-three patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients were randomized into three groups: a placebo-treated control group, a 40-mg parecoxib-treated group (P40) and an 80-mg parecoxib-treated group (P80). We recorded the cumulative fentanyl consumption during the first 20 h post-operatively by patient-controlled analgesia equipment, the pain scores during rest, coughing and mobilization (visual analogue scale, 0-10), the worst pain during the first 2 h post-operatively and in the following 18 h, and the side-effects by questionnaire., Results: No significant differences in fentanyl consumption between the three groups could be detected. The worst pain experienced between 2 and 20 h post-operatively on the ward was significantly lower in the P80 group than in the control group., Conclusion: The recommended dose of parecoxib, 40 mg, is not effective for the treatment of pain during the early post-operative period after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Doubling the dose to 80 mg seems to improve the results.

Objective: To examine the effect of folic acid on the efficacy of methotrexate (MTX) treatment in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) at 12 months in 2 phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of leflunomide in which MTX was used as a comparator., Methods: Analyses were restricted to patients randomized to receive MTX who had rheumatoid factor data. The US study recruited 482 patients with active RA; 179 received at least 1 dose of MTX, and all were mandated to receive 1 mg of oral folic acid once or twice daily. The multinational European study recruited 999 patients with active RA; 489 received at least 1 dose of MTX, and oral folic acid was not required, although 50 received folate after developing an adverse event. Because of similar entry criteria for both studies, the data for patients with available primary outcome data at week 52 were pooled (n = 668), and the patients were grouped by folic acid use (n = 225) and nonuse (n = 443). To account for the significant between-study differences in the MTX groups, baseline covariates were adjusted using propensity scores so that folic acid users could be matched with nonusers. This allowed for a comparison of differences in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% improvement criteria at week 52., Results: At study entry, non-folic acid users had a significantly lower mean body weight, shorter mean RA duration, and higher mean disease activity (measured by joint counts, patient's and physician's global assessments, and acute-phase reactant levels). The mean MTX dosage at week 52 was similar in the 2 RCTs. Using propensity score matching techniques, the proportion of patients achieving an ACR 20% response at week 52 averaged 17% higher in the non-folic acid group than in the folic acid group (range 15-21%). Similarly, the proportion of patients achieving ACR 50% and ACR 70% responses averaged 14% (range 12-16%) and 12% (range 9-14%) higher, respectively, in the non-folic acid group. Adverse events were reported in 93% of US study patients and 94% of the multinational study patients. Elevated liver transaminase levels (above the upper limit of normal) were reported in 29% of the US study patients (majority receiving folic acid) and 62% of the multinational study patients (majority not receiving folic acid)., Conclusion: After using propensity scores to adjust for differences in the baseline characteristics of folic acid users and non-folic acid users, 9-21% fewer MTX-treated RA patients taking folic acid had ACR 20%, 50%, or 70% improvement at 52 weeks compared with those who did not receive folic acid in the 2 phase III RA clinical trials. As a post hoc analysis, the results of this data analysis should be considered "hypothesis generating" and an impetus for future studies regarding the effects of folic acid on the efficacy of MTX in RA.

Aims: To investigate the concentration-effect relationship and pharmacokinetics of leflunomide in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)., Methods: Data were collected from 23 RA patients on leflunomide therapy (as sole disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)) for at least 3 months. Main measures were A77 1726 (active metabolite of leflunomide) plasma concentrations and disease activity measures including pain, duration/intensity of morning stiffness, and SF-36 survey. A population estimate was sought for apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution was fixed (0.155 l kg(-1)). Factors screened for influence on CL/F were weight, age, gender and estimated creatinine clearance., Results: Significantly higher A77 1726 concentrations were seen in patients with less swollen joints and with higher SF-36 mental summary scores than in those with measures indicating more active disease (P < 0.05); concentration-effect trends were seen with five other disease activity measures. Statistical analysis of all disease activity measures showed that mean A77 1726 concentrations in groups with greater control of disease activity were significantly higher than those in whom the measures indicated less desirable control (P < 0.05). There was large between subject variability in the dose-concentration relationship. A steady-state infusion model best described the pharmacokinetic data. Inclusion of age as a covariate decreased interindividual variability (P < 0.01), but this would not be clinically important in terms of dosage changes. Final parameter estimate (% CV interindividual variability) for CL/F was 0.0184 l h(-1) (50%) (95% CI 0.0146, 0.0222). Residual (unexplained) variability (% CV) was 8.5%., Conclusions: This study of leflunomide in patients using the drug clinically indicated a concentration-effect relationship. From our data, a plasma A77 1726 concentration of 50 mg l(-1) is more likely to indicate someone with less active disease than is a concentration around 30 mg l(-1). The marked variability in pharmacokinetics suggests a place for individualized dosing of leflunomide in RA therapy.

Aim: To compare the incidence of abdominal pain, dyspepsia and/or nausea associated with valdecoxib, nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and placebo in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis., Methods: Data from five randomized, double-blind 12-week trials were pooled. Independent risk factors for abdominal pain, dyspepsia and/or nausea were also determined., Results: The final analysis consisted of 4394 patients. Nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users (n = 1185) received naproxen 1000 mg/day (n = 766), ibuprofen 2400 mg/day (n = 207) or diclofenac sodium 150 mg/day (n = 212). Valdecoxib users received 10 mg/day (n = 955), 20 mg/day (n = 851) or 40 mg/day (n = 430). A total of 973 patients received placebo. The nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug group was most likely to report abdominal pain or dyspepsia, while the placebo group reported the highest incidence of nausea. The most important risk factors for abdominal pain, dyspepsia and/or nausea were nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use, gastrointestinal history of nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related intolerance or gastroduodenal ulcers, osteoarthritis diagnosis, female gender and age <65 years., Conclusion: This pooled analysis demonstrates a clear decrease in dyspepsia and an improvement in upper gastrointestinal tolerability for patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis taking valdecoxib, even at supratherapeutic doses, compared with those taking nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs over 12 weeks.

Objective: To obtain preliminary data regarding the efficacy and long-term safety of leflunomide in patients with refractory polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA)., Methods: Twenty-seven patients were entered into the initial 26-week open-label study of leflunomide therapy; 17 entered the extension phase (maximum 107 weeks). Mean disease duration at study entry was 7.0 years. All patients had >or=5 joints with active arthritis and had received methotrexate for a mean of 36.0 months. Following a loading dose, patients initially received leflunomide at a dosage of 10 mg/1.73 m(2)/day, which could be increased to 20 mg/1.73 m(2)/day (maximum 20 mg/day) beginning at week 8. The primary efficacy outcome was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30 (Pedi 30) criteria for improvement. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis was used, and all patients were entered into an intent-to-treat analysis. Intraarticular corticosteroids (maximum of 2 in the initial 26 weeks) were allowed, but no new disease-modifying antirheumatic drug or change in nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug was allowed throughout the study., Results: Seventeen of the 27 patients (63%) completed the initial 26-week study. Fourteen patients (52%) met the ACR Pedi 30 response criteria at week 26. Seventeen patients entered into the extension phase (13 who met response criteria and 4 who failed to meet response criteria but decided to continue). Nine of the 17 patients (53%) who entered the extension phase either completed all 30 months of study or the study ended prior to the month 30 visit. Five patients withdrew because of failure to maintain efficacy, 2 withdrew their consent, and 1 withdrew because of an adverse event. Using LOCF analysis, 65% of patients met ACR Pedi 30 response criteria at 1 year and 2 years (weeks 50 and 106, respectively) and 53% at the end of the study. Good response rates were also seen using ACR Pedi 50 and ACR Pedi 70 criteria (47% and 24% at week 106, respectively)., Conclusion: In this open-label study of JRA patients who either failed to respond to, or were intolerant of, methotrexate, the majority met the ACR Pedi 30 response criteria at week 26. The response was durable, since 53% of patients who entered into the extension phase (maximum 30 months) responded at the end of this phase. Our findings support the further study of the role of leflunomide in the treatment of polyarticular-course JRA.

Background: Opioids are associated with numerous adverse effects. It is unclear if reduced postoperative opioid consumption lowers the incidence and severity of opioid-related adverse effects. This analysis -- from a multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial -- tested if the reduction of opioid consumption among patients who received intravenous preoperative parecoxib 40 mg, followed by oral valdecoxib 40 mg qd postoperatively, in Days 1-4 after outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery, reduced opioid-related symptoms., Methods: Patients received intravenous fentanyl for pain before discharge, and oral acetaminophen 500 mg hydrocodone 5 mg q 4-6 h prn postdischarge for up to 7 days postsurgery. Patients also received intravenous parecoxib 40 mg administered 30-45 min preoperatively, and valdecoxib 40 mg qd up to Day 4 and prn Days 5-7 postsurgery, or placebo. Patients completed an opioid-related Symptoms Distress Scale (SDS) questionnaire every 24 h for 7 days. Opioid use was converted to morphine-equivalent doses (MEDs). Clinically meaningful events (CMEs) for 12 opioid-related symptoms were assessed by three ordinal measures: frequency, severity, and bothersomeness. Reduction of CMEs on Day 1 and number of patient-days with CMEs on Days 1-4 were examined., Results: Cumulative MEDs on Day 0, Day 1, and Days 1-4 were significantly lower in the parecoxib/valdecoxib group compared with the placebo group (P < 0.001). At the end of Day 1, parecoxib/valdecoxib-treated patients had significantly lower SDS scores (P < 0.02), a significantly reduced incidence of CMEs (P < 0.05), and significantly fewer patient-days with CMEs in Days 1-4 than placebo patients (P < 0.05). Patients in the parecoxib/valdecoxib group were less likely to have CMEs for multiple symptoms than those in the placebo group (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Treatment with parecoxib and valdecoxib significantly reduced the cumulative MED requirements, the incidence of opioid-related adverse effects, and patient-days with CMEs.

Objective: Current treatment options for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are limited. Leflunomide, an oral pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, is highly effective in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, and small studies have suggested similar efficacy in PsA. We undertook this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide in patients with PsA and psoriasis., Methods: One hundred ninety patients with active PsA and psoriasis (at least 3% skin involvement) were randomized to receive leflunomide (100 mg/day loading dose for 3 days followed by 20 mg/day orally) or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients classified as responders by the Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC). Additional efficacy (joint and skin involvement), safety, and quality-of-life assessments were performed., Results: At 24 weeks, 56 of 95 leflunomide-treated patients (58.9%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 48.4-68.9) and 27 of 91 placebo-treated patients (29.7% [95% CI 20.6-40.2]) were classified as responders by the PsARC (P < 0.0001). Significant differences in favor of leflunomide were also observed in the proportions of patients achieving modified American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria, improvement in the designated psoriasis target lesion, and mean changes from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores and quality-of-life assessments. Diarrhea and alanine aminotransferase increases occurred at higher rates in the leflunomide group. No cases of serious liver toxicity were observed., Conclusion: Leflunomide is an effective treatment for PsA and psoriasis, providing a safe and convenient alternative to current therapies.

Objective: To report the safety and efficacy of leflunomide (LEF) in combination with infliximab (INF) for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis., Methods: In an open, multicenter, retrospective study, data were collected on the safety and efficacy of LEF and INF., Results: Eighty-eight patients received the combination of LEF and INF for an average of 6.6 months and a total exposure of 581 patient-months. The mean duration of LEF was 17 +/- 9 months (range 3-32 months; median 18.5 months) with an average of 4.8 INF infusions per patient. In all but 3 subjects, LEF was used initially and INF was added later. Infusion reactions occurred in 3 patients (0.7% of all infusions). A total of 34% of subjects experienced adverse events and in 6 (6.8% of the group) these were deemed serious. Ten infections occurred when patients were taking the combination; 9 patients recovered fully and 1 died of bacterial pneumonia. A lifetime smoker developed lung cancer and another patient was found to have colon cancer., Conclusions: The adverse events noted within the combination therapy group were in keeping with the known risks of each drug when used individually. Limited data were available on efficacy, but a general improvement in disease control was noted with the combination of drugs, which for most patients involved the addition of INF to previous use of LEF.

Background: In long-term outcomes studies, cyclooxygenase COX-2 specific inhibitors spare COX-1 at supratherapeutic doses and therefore demonstrate improved gastrointestinal safety over nonspecific nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, in clinical practice, anti-inflammatory drugs are often used for short-term treatment of pain., Aim: To compare the short-term upper gastrointestinal mucosal effects of naproxen with the new COX-2 specific inhibitor, valdecoxib, or placebo, in elderly subjects., Methods: In this multicentre, double-blind, randomized, study, elderly subjects (65-76 years old), with a normal baseline esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), received oral valdecoxib (a supratherapeutic 40 mg b.d. dosage, n = 62), naproxen (500 mg b.d., n = 62), or placebo (n = 62) for 6.5 days. Upper gastrointestinal mucosal injury was evaluated post-treatment by EGD (day 7)., Results: Subjects receiving naproxen (11/60, 18%) had significantly more gastroduodenal ulcers post-treatment than those receiving placebo (2/61, 3%; P < 0.01) or valdecoxib (0/60, 0%; P < 0.001). A similar significant finding was observed for gastric ulcer rates. All treatments had similar adverse event rates and clinical laboratory findings., Conclusions: Valdecoxib, even at supratherapeutic doses, was associated with an ulcer rate significantly lower than naproxen but similar to placebo in healthy elderly subjects, despite the short duration of therapy (6.5 days). Naproxen and valdecoxib were as well tolerated as placebo.

Objective: Ethical constraints on the conduct of placebo-controlled trials evaluating new therapies for serious chronic diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), indicate the need for discerning methods to assess treatment effect in active-controlled clinical trials. Dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DEMRI) is a sensitive technique for the detection of synovial inflammation in RA. Therefore, this investigation was undertaken to evaluate DEMRI as an efficacy assessment tool for differentiating treatment effect in a randomized, active-controlled trial comparing leflunomide and methotrexate., Methods: Patients with active RA (n = 39) were randomized in a 2-center, prospective, double-blind clinical trial to receive either leflunomide (n = 18) or methotrexate (n = 21) therapy for 4 months. DEMRI scans were obtained at baseline and at 4 months, and the initial rate of enhancement (IRE) and the maximal signal intensity (SI) enhancement (ME) were calculated from the SI curves. Clinical improvement was assessed by conventional outcome measures., Results: Thirty-four patients (17 treated with leflunomide and 17 with methotrexate) had usable baseline and end point DEMRI scans. Leflunomide treatment was associated with a significantly greater improvement in IRE compared with methotrexate treatment (P < 0.05). Average values of ME indicated reduction of inflammation with both leflunomide and methotrexate. The improvement in clinical signs and symptoms, as measured by traditional assessments, was comparable for both active treatments., Conclusion: Results of this study validate the sensitivity of DEMRI in detecting inflammatory changes in active RA in response to treatment. Improvement in synovial inflammation as measured by IRE was significantly better with leflunomide than with methotrexate over 4 months of therapy.

Objective: Three 6-12-month, double-blind, randomized, controlled trials have shown leflunomide (LEF; 20 mg/day, loading dose 100 mg x 3 days) to be effective and safe for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This analysis of the North American trial assessed whether the clinical benefit evident at month 12 was sustained over 24 months of treatment with LEF as compared with the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX), an equivalent disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, at 24 months., Methods: The year-2 cohort, comprising patients continuing into the second year of treatment with > or = 1 dose of study medication and > or = 1 followup visit after week 52, consisted of 235 patients (LEF n = 98; placebo n = 36; MTX n = 101). The mean (+/- SD) maintenance dose of LEF was 19.6 +/- 1.99 mg/day in year 2 and that of MTX was 12.6 +/- 4.69 mg/week. Statistical analyses used an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach. Statistical comparisons of the active treatments only were prospectively defined in the protocol., Results: In total, 85% and 79% of LEF and MTX patients, respectively, who entered year 2 completed 24 months of treatment. From month 12 to month 24, the American College of Rheumatology improvement response rates of > or = 20% (LEF 79% versus MTX 67%; P = 0.049), > or = 50% (LEF 56% versus MTX 43%; P = 0.053), and > or = 70% (LEF 26% versus MTX 20%; P = 0.361) were sustained in both of the active treatment groups. The mean change in total Sharp radiologic damage scores at year 2 compared with year 1 and baseline (LEF 1.6 versus MTX 1.2) showed statistically equivalent sustained retardation of radiographic progression in the active treatment groups. Maximal improvements evident at 6 months in the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) disability index (HAQ DI) and the physical component score of the Medical Outcomes Survey 36-item short form were sustained over 12 months and 24 months; improvement in the HAQ DI with LEF4(-0.60) was statistically significantly superior to that with MTX (-0.37) at 24 months (P = 0.005). Over 24 months in the ITT cohort, serious treatment-related adverse events were reported in 1.6% of the LEF-treated patients and 3.7% of the MTX-treated patients. Frequently reported adverse events included upper respiratory tract infections, diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, rash, reversible alopecia, and transient liver enzyme elevations., Conclusion: The safety and efficacy of LEF and MTX were maintained over the second year of this 2-year trial. Both active treatments retarded radiographic progression over 24 months. LEF was statistically significantly superior to MTX in improving physical function as measured by the HAQ DI over 24 months of treatment. Results indicate that LEF is a safe and effective initial treatment for active RA, with clinical benefit sustained over 2 years of treatment without evidence of new or increased toxicity.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of leflunomide or methotrexate compared with placebo in improving function and health-related quality of life in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to examine correlations between response status (as defined by the American College of Rheumatology [ACR] response criteria) and improvement in these measures., Methods: This 52-week, multicenter, doubleblind, controlled trial compared responses to the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (MHAQ), Problem Elicitation Technique (PET), Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36), and questions regarding work productivity among 3 treatment groups (leflunomide, methotrexate, and placebo). Improvement in the PET top 5 and SF-36 scales and component scores were compared with ACR response rates., Results: Clinically meaningful and statistically significant (P<0.0001) improvement in measures of function and heath-related quality of life (MHAQ scores, all scales and disability index of the HAQ, weighted top 5 score of the PET, 5 of 8 scales and physical component score of the SF-36, and work productivity) was seen during treatment with leflunomide in comparison with placebo. Methotrexate administration resulted in significant improvements (P<0.05) in comparison with placebo in the MHAQ scores, HAQ disability index, weighted top 5 score of the PET, physical component score of the SF-36, and bodily pain scale. Compared with methotrexate, leflunomide administration resulted in significantly (P<0.01) more improvement in the MHAQ scores, 5 of 8 scales and disability index of the HAQ, weighted top 5 score of the PET, and 2 of 8 scales and physical component score of the SF-36. Improvements in the PET score, SF-36 physical component score, and work productivity correlated with the ACR responder rates of > or =20% and > or =50% improvement., Conclusion: Significant improvements in function and health-related quality of life occurred in patients with RA during treatment with leflunomide or methotrexate. These findings were clinically meaningful and correlated with the ACR response status.

Objective: To examine the safety and pharmacokinetics of and clinical response to leflunomide, a de novo pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, when administered to patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have been receiving long-term methotrexate therapy., Methods: This was an open-label, 52-week study in which 30 patients with RA that remained active despite therapy with methotrexate at 17+/-4 mg/week (mean +/- SD) for > or =6 months were given leflunomide, 10-20 mg/day. Patients were assessed for adverse effects, pharmacokinetic measurements of leflunomide and methotrexate, and clinical response by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response criteria., Results: Twenty-three patients completed 1 year of treatment. No significant pharmacokinetic interactions between leflunomide and methotrexate were noted. This combination therapy was generally well tolerated clinically, with the exception of elevations of liver enzyme levels. Seven patients withdrew from the treatment regimen: 2 withdrawals were voluntary, 3 were due to persistent elevation of plasma transaminase levels, and 2 were due to lack of efficacy. Of the patients, 16 (53%) met ACR 20% response criteria. Two met ACR criteria for remission after 1 year., Conclusion: The combination of methotrexate and leflunomide has therapeutic potential in RA.

A double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combined serotonin-dopamine antagonist risperidone in mentally retarded patients with persistent behavioural disturbances. After an observation period of 1 week, risperidone 4-12 mg or placebo was administered during 3 weeks as add-on treatment to the existing medication, followed by a 1-week single-blind placebo wash-out, and another 3 weeks of double-blind treatment with the cross-over medication. Thirty-seven patients participated in the trials; 30 completed the study. Risperidone was significantly superior to placebo in its effect on the Aberrant Behaviour Checklist and the Clinical Global Impression. The Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale did not show any differences between risperidone and placebo. Two patients experienced hypotension at the start of the risperidone administration. Sedation and drowsiness were the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events. The results of this trial warrant further investigation into the therapeutic assets of risperidone in this indication, as add-on therapy and as monotherapy.

Forty-four chronic schizophrenic inpatients participated in this multicentre 12-week parallel-group double-blind trial. After a run-in period of 2 weeks and a single-blind placebo wash-out of 1 week, they were randomly assigned to treatment with either the serotonin2 and dopamine-D2 antagonist risperidone or haloperidol. Two patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis. Five patients dropped out in the haloperidol group and 1 in the risperidone group. At the end of the trial, the mean daily dose was 12 mg for risperidone and 10 mg for haloperidol. The risperidone group showed greater improvement on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia, the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-change version, and the Nurses' Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation. The improvement of negative symptoms was more pronounced in the risperidone group until week 8 of double-blind treatment. The consumption of antiparkinsonian medication was 10 times lower with risperidone. Both drugs were well tolerated and the laboratory, endocrinological and cardiovascular safety parameters were comparable. This study suggests that risperidone is comparable to haloperidol as an antipsychotic, but that it has a safer EPS profile.

In an early phase-2 study, THIP (4,5,6,7-tetrahydroisoxazolo(5,4-c)pyridin-3-ol) was investigated in a single-blind controlled trial comprising 9 outpatients suffering from epilepsy. THIP was added to the concomitant antiepileptic treatment with increasing doses (15 to 120 mg/day) based on therapeutic effect or side-effects. The blood levels of concomitant therapy were kept constant. No significant difference was established between the number of seizures during treatment with maximal doses of THIP and placebo. A trend was observed for lower seizure frequency during a period on submaximal dose of THIP.